Employer-Supported Child Care as a Women-Responsive Policy

Abstract

The recent “mommy track” debate raises questions about how employers ought best to accommodate women's (and men's) dual commitments to work and family. The “mommy track” approach suggests instituting different career paths for women who expect to have children and those who do not. A less discriminatory approach is to implement family-supportive policies applicable to both women and men. This article examines one such policy — employer-supported child care—and discusses its nature and its implications for improving labor force opportunities for women. Primary data come from two sources: a survey of 99 randomly selected employers in three Eastern states and in-depth interviews with 25 employers across the country, 20 that already support a child-care benefit and five that considered it but decided not to. The article concludes that although employers support child care out of their own organizational self-interest, the implication of their support for women's occupational advancement is not insignificant.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, K. (1983). Corporate initiatives for working parents in New York City: A ten-industry review. New York: Center for Public Advocacy Research.

Auerbach, J. D. (1986). Working parents and child care responsibility in the U.S.: The new role of the employer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Axel, H. (1985). Corporations and families: Changing practices and perspectives (Report No. 868) New York: The Conference Board.

Baden, C. , & Friedman, D. E. (Eds.). (1981). New management initiatives for working parents: Reports from an April 1981 conference. Boston: Wheelock College.

Berkeley Planning Associates. (1989). Employer-supported child care: Measuring and understanding its impacts on the workplace. Oakland, CA: Berkeley Planning Associates.

Bureau of National Affairs. (1984). Employers and child care: Development of a new employee benefit. Washington, DC: Author.

Bureau of National Affairs. (1989). 101 key statistics on work and family for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.

Burud, S. L. , Aschbacher, P.R. , & McCroskey, J. M. (1984). Employer supported child care: Investing in human resources. Boston: Auburn House.

Fernandez, J. P. (1986). Child care and corporate productivity: Resolving family/work conflicts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

10.

Friedman, D. E. (1983). Employer supported child care: How does it answer the needs of workers?” Vital Issues, 32, 1-6.

11.

Governor's Advisory Committee on Child Development. (1981). Employer sponsored child care. Sacramento, CA: Author.

12.

Hudson Institute. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the twenty-first century. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute.

13.

Kamerman, S. B. (1983). Meeting family needs: The corporate response (Highlights from the literature).” Work in America Studies in Productivity (No. 33). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

14.

Magid, R. Y. (1983). Child care initiatives for working parents: Why employers get involved. New York: American Management Association.

15.

Miller, T. I. (1984). The effects of employer-sponsored child care on employee absenteeism, turnover, productivity, recruitment or job satisfaction: What is claimed and what is known. Personnel Psychology, 37, 277-289.

16.

Parents in the Workplace. (1983). Sick Child Care. Minneapolis, MN: Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association.

17.

Perry, K. S. (1980). Child care centers sponsored by employers and labor unions in the U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau.

18.

Policy/Action Institute . (1986). Corporate child care initiatives: The potential for employer involvement in child care programs (Report sponsored by the Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency and the Policy/Action Institute of Transitional Employment Enterprises).

19.

Raabe, P. H. , & Gessner, J. C. (1988). Employer family-supportive policies: Diverse variations on a theme. Family Relations, 37, 196-202.

20.

Reskin, B. F. , & Hartmann, H. (Eds.). (1986). Women's work, men's work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

21.

Schwartz, F. N. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65-76.

22.

Spalter-Roth, R. M. , & Hartmann, H. (1989). Unnecessary losses: Costs to Americans of the lack of family and medical leave (#A101). Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.