The state of American families in the 1980s is examined in the light of a series of issues regarding the paradigm currently prevailing within family studies. On the basis of those issues, the question is raised whether or not an alternative perspective might more validly describe currently emerging family-type empirical realities. The outlines of such a perspective are described, drawing on the emerging cross-disciplinary focus on close or primary relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldous, Joan. 1978. Family Careers: Developmental Change in Families. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Bardis, P. D. 1964. “Family Forms and Variations Historically Considered.” Pp. 403-461 in Handbook of Marriage and Family, edited by H. T. Christensen. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3.
Bell, N. W. and E. G. Vogel. 1960. “Toward a Framework for Functional Analysis of Family Behavior.” Pp. 1-36 in A Modern Introduction to the Family, edited by N. W. Bell and E. F. Vogel. New York: Free Press.
4.
Bellah, Robert N. , R. Madsen, W. M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S. M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Berger, Joseph, M. Zelditch, Jr. , and B. Anderson. 1972. “Introduction.” In Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, edited by J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., and B. Anderson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Bernard, Jessie1981. The Good-Provider Role: Its Rise and Fall. American Psychologist, 36(January):1-12.
7.
Berscheid, Elaine and L. A. Peplau. 1983. “The Emerging Science of Relationships.” Pp. 1-19 in Close Relationships, edited by H. H. Kelleyet al.New York: Freeman.
8.
Blumstein, Philip and Pepper Schwartz. 1983. American Couples: Money, Work, Sex. New York: William Morrow.
9.
Bossard, J.H.S. 1956. The Large Family System. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.
Broderick, C. B.1971. “Decade Review, Part 2.”Journal of Marriage and Family33 (February).
11.
Buckley, Walter. 1967. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
Burgess, Robert and Ted Huston, eds. 1979. Social Exchange in Developing Relationships. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Burr, Wesley R. , R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. L. Reiss, eds. 1979. Contemporary Theories About the Family. Vols. 1-2. New York: Free Press.
14.
Buunk, B. 1983. “Alternative Life Styles from an International Perspective: A Transatlantic Comparison.” Pp. 308-330 in Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles, edited by E. D. Macklin and R. H. Rubin. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Caplow, Theodore , H. M. Bahr, B. A. Chadwick, R. Hill, and M. H. Williamson. 1982. Middletown Families: Fifty Years of Change and Continuity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
Christensen, Andrew.“Conceptual Analysis of Distress and Treatment.” Pp. 399-448 in Close Relationships, edited by H. H. Kelleyet al.New York: Freeman.
17.
Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Collins, Randall. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Connecticut Mutual Life. 1981. Report on American Values in the '80s: The Impact of Belief. Hartford, CT: Author.
20.
D'Antonio, William V. 1983. “Family Life, Religion, and Societal Values and Structures.” Pp. 81-108 in Families and Religions: Conflict and Change in Modern Society, edited by W. V. D'Antonio and J. Aldous. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Davis, Kingsley. 1972. “The American Family in Relation to Demographic Change.” Pp. 237-265 in Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, edited by C. F. Westoff and R. Parkes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
22.
Davis, M. S. 1973. Intimate Relations. New York: Free Press.
23.
Douvan, Elizabeth. 1977. “Interpersonal Relationships: Some Questions and Observations.” Pp. 17-32 in Close Relationships, edited by G. Levinger and H. Raush. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
24.
Duck, S. , A. Lock, G. McCall, M. A. Fitzpatrick, and J. Coyne.1984. “Social and Personal Relationships: A Joint Editorial.”Journal of Social and Personal Relationships1(March):1-10.
25.
Duncan, Gregory and J. N. Morgan. 1985. “The Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” Pp. 50-74 in Life Course Dynamics, edited by G. H. Elder. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Ehrmann, W. 1964. “Marital and Nonmarital Sexual Behavior.” Pp. 585-622 in Handbook of Marriage and Family, edited by H. T. Christensen. Chicago: Rand McNally.
27.
Elder, Glen H., Jr. 1975. “Age Differentiation and the Life Course.” Pp. 165-180 in Review of Sociology, Vol. 1., edited by A. Inkeles, J. Coleman, and N. Smelser. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
28.
Farber, Bernard. 1964. Family: Organization and Interaction. San Francisco: Chandler.
29.
Francoeur, R. T. 1983. “Religious Reactions to Alternative Life Styles.” Pp. 379-399 in Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles, edited by E. D. Macklin and R. H. Rubin. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Furstenberg, Frank F., Jr. , and Graham G. Spanier. 1984. Recycling the Family: Remarriage After Divorce. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Giddens, Anthony. 1981. “Agency, Institution and Time-Space Analysis.” Pp. 161-174 in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32.
Goffman, Erving. 1972. “The Neglected Situation.” In Language and Social Context, edited by P. P. Giglioli. Hammondsworth, England: Penguin.
33.
Goode, William J. 1959. “The Sociology of the Family.” In Sociology Today, edited by R. K. Merton, L. Broom, and L. S. Cottrell, Jr.New York: Basic Books.
34.
Hill, Reuben and D. A. Hansen.1960. “The Identification of Conceptual Frameworks Utilized in Family Study.”Marriage and Family Living22(August):99-311.
35.
Hofferth, Sandra. 1985. “Children's Life Course: Family Structure and Living Arrangements in Cohort Perspective.” Pp. 75-112 in Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions, 1968-1980, edited by G. H. Elder. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Holman, T. B. and W. R. Burr.1980. “Beyond the Beyond: The Growth of Family Theories in the 1970s.”Journal of Marriage and Family, 42(November):729-742.
37.
Howard, R. 1981. A Social History of American Family Sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
38.
Kelley, H. H. 1983. “Epilogue: An Essential Science.” In Close Relationships, edited by H. H. Kelleyet al.New York: Freeman.
39.
Kelley, H. H.et al. , eds. 1983. Close Relationships. New York: Freeman.
40.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981. “Introduction: The Micro-Sociological Challenge of Macro-Sociology: Toward a Reconstruction of Social Theory and Methodology.” In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41.
Lamb, M. , ed. 1982. Nontraditional Families: Parenting and Child Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Lerner, Richard M. and Graham B. Spanier. 1978. “A Dynamic View of Interactional Child and Family Development.” Pp. 1-22 in Child Influences on Marital and Familial Interaction, edited by R. M. Lerner and G. B. Spanier. New York: Academic Press.
43.
Levinger, George and H. L. Raush, eds. Close Relationships: Perspectives on the Meaning of Intimacy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
44.
Lopata, Helen Z. , C. A. Miller, D. Barnewolt. 1984. City Women: Work, Jobs, Occupations, Careers. New York: Praeger.
45.
Macklin, Eleanor D. and R. H. Rubin, eds. 1983. Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Matthews, S. H. 1983. “Gender Role Changes.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association.
47.
Morgan, M. Y. and J. Scanzoni.1987. “Values About Divorce: Assessing Variation in Permanence/Pragmatism Orientations.”Journal of Divorce10.
48.
Murdock, George P. 1949. Social Structure. New York: Macmillan.
49.
Parsons, Talcott. 1955. “The American Family: Its Relation to Personality and to Social Structure.” In Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process, edited by T. Parsons and R. F. Bales. New York: Free Press.
50.
Peters, M. F. and H. P. McAdoo. 1983. “The Present and Future of Alternative Lifestyles in Ethnic American Cultures.” Pp. 288-307 in Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles, edited by E. D. Macklin and R. H. Rubin. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Pitts, J. R. 1964. “The Structural-Functional Approach.” Pp. 51-124 in Handbook of Marriage and the Family, edited by H. T. Christensen. Chicago: Rand McNally.
52.
Rainwater, L. 1984. “Observations.” In Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The Changing Economics Fortunes of American Workers and Families, edited by G. J. Duncan. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
53.
Raush, H. L. 1977. “Orientations to the Close Relationship.” Pp. 163-188 in Close Relationships: Perspectives on the Meaning of Intimacy, edited by G. Levinger and H. L. Raush. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
54.
Reiss, Ira. 1986. Journey into Sexuality: An Exploratory Voyage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55.
Richardson, L. 1985. The New Other Woman: Contemporary Single Women in Affairs with Married Men. New York: Free Press.
Rodgers, R. H. 1973. Family Interaction and Transaction: The Developmental Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
58.
Rubin, Lillian B. 1983. Intimate Strangers: Men and Women Together. New York: Harper & Row.
59.
Scanzoni, John. 1983. Shaping Tomorrow's Family: Theory and Policy for the 21st Century. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Scanzoni, John , K. Polonko, J. Teachman, and L. Thompson, eds. In press. Exploring the Sexual Bond: Rethinking Families and Close Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Seeley, John R. , R. A. Sim, and E. W. Loosley. 1956. Crestwood Heights. New York: Basic Books.
62.
Sirjamaki, John 1964. “The Institutional Approach.” Pp. 128-147 in Handbook of Marriage and Family, edited by H. T. Christensen. Chicago: Rand McNally.
63.
Spanier, Graham B. and L. Thompson, L. 1984. Parting: The Aftermath of Separation and Divorce. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
Stryker, Sheldon. 1964. “The Interactional and Situational Approaches.” In Handbook of Marriage and Family, edited by H. T. Christensen. Chicago: Rand McNally.
65.
Taubin, S. B. and E. H. Mudd. 1983. “Contemporary Traditional Families: The Undefined Majority.” Pp. 256-270 in Contemporary Families and Alternative Life Styles, edited by E. D. Macklin and R. H. Rubin. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66.
Teachman, Jay. In press. “Models and Observation Plans for Use in Researching Romantic Close Relationships.” In Exploring the Sexual Bond: Rethinking Families and Close Relationships, edited by J. Scanzoniet al.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67.
Wattenberg, Ben. 1984. The Good News Is the Bad News Is Wrong. New York: Simon & Schuster.
68.
Weirsma, G. E. 1983. Cohabitation, an Alternative to Marriage? A Cross-National Study. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
69.
Weis, D. L. 1983. “Open” Marriage and Multilateral Relationships: The Emergence of Nonexclusive Models of the Marriage Relationship. Pp. 194-215 in Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles, edited by E. D. Macklin and R. H. Rubin. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Weitzman, L. J. 1981. The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law. New York: Free Press.
71.
Yankelovich, Daniel.1981a. “New Rules in American Life: Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down.”Psychology Today15(April):35-91.
72.
Yankelovich, Daniel. 1981b. New Rules: Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down. New York: Random House.
