This article investigates short-term changes in neighborhood conditions for families moving from Chicago public housing as part of the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) demonstration program. MTO features a controlled experimental design and thus may be better suited, in the long run, than recent survey-based studies to elucidate the effects of neighborhood conditions on family and children's well-being. We focus on five key aspects of family well-being: neighborhood conditions, feelings of safety, experiences with crime, opportunities and risks for teenagers, and access to services. All mover families experienced significant improvements on each measure, yet those that were required to move to low-poverty neighborhoods experienced the greatest improvements. The only drawback to these low-poverty moves appears to be the relative isolation of the destination, particularly concerning access to public transportation; however, more intensive housing counseling might help families choose neighborhoods with better access to transportation and closer to other services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Brooks-Gunn, J. , Duncan, G., & Aber, L. (1997). Neighborhood poverty, volume 1. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
4.
Davis, M. (1993). The Gautreaux Assisted Housing Program. In G. T. Kingsley & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Housing markets and residential mobility (pp. 243-255). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
5.
Duncan, G. , & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Neighborhoods and adolescent development: How can we determine the links? Paper presented at Does it take a village: Community effects on children, adolescents and families, Penn State University.
6.
Ellen, I. , & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 833-866.
7.
Elliott, D. , Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389-426.
8.
Farley, R. , Fielding, E., & Krysan, M. (1997). The residential preferences of Blacks and Whites: A four-metropolitan analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 763-800.
9.
Furstenberg, F. , Cook, T., Eccles, J., Elder, G., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Furstenberg, F. , & Hughes, M. E. (1997). The influence of neighborhoods on children's development: A theoretical perspective and a research agenda. In R. Hauser, B. Brown, & W. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children's well-being (pp. 346-371). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
Galster, G. , & Killen, S. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7-43.
12.
Goering, J. , & Feins, J. (1997). The Moving to Opportunity social “experiment”: Early stages of implementation and research plans. Poverty Research News, 1, 4-6.
13.
Goering, J. , Kraft, J., Feins, J., McGinnis, D., Holin, M. J., & Elhassan, H. (1999). Moving to Opportunity for fair housing demonstration program: Current status and initial findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
14.
Jones, L. , & Newman, L. (1997). Our America. New York: Scribners.
15.
Kotlowitz, A. (1991). There are no children here. New York: Anchor Books.
16.
Massey, D. , & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17.
Newman, S. , & Schnare, A. (1997). “And a suitable living environment”: The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 703-742.
18.
Oliver, M. , & Shapiro, T. (1995). Black wealth/White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
19.
Popkin, S. J. , Gwiasda, V. E., Buron, L., & Amendolia, J. (1998). Chicago housing authority resident satisfaction and management needs survey: Final report. Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
20.
Popkin, S. J. , Gwiasda, V. E., Rosenbaum, D. P., & Olson, L. M. (2000). The hidden war: Crime and the tragedy of public housing in Chicago. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
21.
Rosenbaum, J. (1991). Black pioneers: Do their moves to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children?Housing Policy Debate, 2, 1179-1213.
22.
Rosenbaum, J. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231-269.
23.
Rosenbaum, E. , Friedman, S., Schill, M., & Buddelmeyer, H. (1999). Nativity differences in neighborhood quality among New York City households, 1996. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 625-658.
24.
Rubinowitz, L. S. , Rosenbaum, J., Dvorin, S., Kulieke, M., McCareins, A., & Popkin, S. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to White suburbia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Sampson, R. (1997). The embeddedness of child and adolescent development: A community-level perspective on urban violence. In J. McCord (Ed.), Childhood and violence in the inner city (pp. 31-77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Sampson, R. , Morenhoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.
27.
Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Tobin, M. (1993). User's guide for the Urban Institute's underclass database (UDB). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
29.
Turner, M. A. (1993). Limits on neighborhood choice: Evidence of racial and ethnic steering in urban housing markets. In M. Fix & R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence (pp. 118-147). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
30.
Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 373-394.
31.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996). Moving to Opportunity for fair housing demonstration program. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). In the crossfire: The impact of gun violence on public housing communities. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears. New York: Knopf.
35.
Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
Zubrinsky, C. , & Bobo, L. (1996). Prismatic metropolis: Race and residential segregation in the City of Angels. Social Science Research, 25, 335-374.
