Family strategies for caregiving and income generation are examined in a qualitative study of employed parents of disabled children in the United Kingdom. Four family patterns for working and caring emerged: modified single earner, one-and-a-half earners, dual earners, and flexible dual earners. A number of social, economic, and ideological factors contributed to decision making for these families. Gender expectations and related ideology of caring were usually the most salient, coloring the meanings ascribed to other influencing factors. Gender assumptions in the wider context underpin the difficulties many families experience in obtaining formal supports. The authors argue that flexible community-based and employer supports are crucial to help parents with disabled children to work and care. Beyond this, however, strategies that challenge gender expectations can extend the range of options available to parents, whereas more traditional approaches perpetuate inequalities and family hardship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barker, R. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bennett, F. , & Abrahams, C. (1994). Unequal opportunities: Children with disabilities and their families speak out. London: NCH Action for Children.
4.
Beresford, B. (1994). Positively parents: Caring for a severely disabled child. London: HMSO.
5.
Blain, J. (1994). Discourses of agency and domestic labor. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 515-549.
6.
Brannen, J. , & Moss, P. (1991). Managing mothers. Dual earner households after maternity leave. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
7.
Brannen, J. , Moss, P., Owen, C., & Wale, C. (1997). Mothers, fathers and employment: Parents and the labour market 1984-1994. Sheffield, UK: Department for Education and Employment.
8.
Bridges, W. (1994). Job shift. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Burchell, B. J. , Day, D., Hudson, M., Ladipo, D., Mankelow, J. P., Nolan, H.R., Wichert, I., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Job insecurity and work intensification: Flexibility and the changing boundaries of work. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
10.
Cook, J. A. (1988). Who “mothers” the chronically mentally ill?Family Relations, 37, 32-49.
11.
Cooper, C. L. , & Lewis, S. (1994). Managing the new workforce. San Diego: Pfeiffer.
12.
Dalley, G. (1996). Ideologies of caring. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Department for Education and Employment. (1996). Work and family: Ideas and options for childcare. A consultation document. London: Author.
14.
European Commission Network on Childcare. (1996). A review of services for young children in the European Union. 1990-1995. Brussels: Author.
15.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 91-100.
16.
Flood, R. L. , & Romm, N.R.A. (1996). Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17.
Floyd, F. J. , & Gallagher, E. M. (1997). Parental stress, care demands, and use of support services for school age children with disabilities and behavior problemsFamily Relations, 46, 359-371.
18.
Freedman, R. , Litchfield, L., & Warfield, M. E. (1995, October). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Perspectives of parents of children with developmental disabilities. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 507-514.
19.
Gallimore, R. , Weisner, T. S., Bernheimer, I. P., Guthrie, D., & Nihira, K. (1993). Family responses to young children with developmental delays. American Journal in Mental Retardation, 98, 185-206.
20.
Heller, T. , Hsieh, K., & Rowitz, L. (1997). Maternal and paternal caregiving of persons with mental retardation across the life span. Family Relations, 46, 407-415.
21.
Hertz, R. (1986). More equal than others. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
Hertz, R. (1997). A typology of approaches to child care: The centerpiece of organizing family life for dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 355-385.
23.
Hill, S. A. , & Zimmerman, M. K. (1995). Valiant girls and vulnerable boys: The impact of gender and race on mothers' caregiving for chronically ill children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 43-53.
24.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
25.
Holt, H. , & Thaulow, I. (1996). Formal and informal flexibility in the workplace. In S. Lewis & J. Lewis (Eds.), The work family challenge. Rethinking employment (pp. 79-92). London: Sage Ltd.
26.
Hooymans, N. R. , & Gonyea, J. (1995). Feminist perspectives on family care. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Kagan, C. , Lewis, S., & Heaton, P. (1998). Caring to work: Parents combining employment with the care of disabled children. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
28.
Knudson-Martin, C. , & Mahoney, A. R. (1998). Language and processes in the construction of equality in new marriages. Family Relations, 47, 81-91.
29.
Lewis, S. , & Cooper, C. (1987). Stress in two earner couples and stage in the life cycleJournal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 289-303.
30.
Lewis, S. , & Cooper, C. L. (1988). Stress in dual earner families. In B. A. Gutek, A. H. Stromburg, & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women and work. An annual review (Vol. 3, pp. 139-168). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Lewis, S. , & Cooper, C. L. (1995). The work/family interface. A European perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 5, 289-305.
32.
Lewis, S. , & Cooper, C. L. (1999). The work-family research agenda in changing contexts. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 382-393.
33.
Lewis, S. , Kagan, C., & Heaton, P. (1999). Managing work-family diversity for parents of disabled children. Beyond policy to practice. Personnel Review, 29, 417-430.
34.
Lewis, S. , Kagan, C., Heaton, P., & Cranshaw, M. (1999). Economic and psychological benefits from employment: The experiences and perspectives of mothers of disabled children. Disability and Society, 14, 561-575.
35.
Lincoln, Y. , & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement and the distribution of family labor. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 141-159.
37.
Matocha, L. K. (1992). Case study interviews: Caring for persons with AIDS. In J. F. Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Mechanic, D. (1982). The epidemiology of illness behavior and its relationship to physical and psychological distress. In D. Mechanic (Ed.), Symptoms, illness behavior and help seeking (pp. 1-24). New York: Prodist.
39.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Miller, S. (1996). Questioning, resisting, acquiescing, balancing: New mothers' career re-entry strategies. Health Care for Women International, 17(2), 109-131.
41.
Perry-Jenkins, M. , & Crouter, A. C. (1990). Men's provider role attitudes. Implications for household work and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 136-156.
42.
Pleck, J. (1985). Working wives/working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
Potuchek, J. (1992). Employed wives orientation to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 133-145.
44.
Raabe, P. (1996). Constructing pluralistic work and career arrangements. In S. Lewis & J. Lewis (Eds.), The work-family challenge. Rethinking employment (pp. 128-141). London: Sage Ltd.
45.
Rana, B. , Kagan, C., Lewis, S., & Rout, U. (1998). British South Asian women managers and professionals: Experiences of work and family. Women in Management Review, 13, 221-232.
46.
Ritchie, J. , & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
47.
Rout, U. , Lewis, S., & Kagan, C. (1999). Work and family roles: Indian career women, in India and the West. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 6, 91-108.
48.
Schwarzenberg, N. S. , & Dytell, R. S. (1996). Dual earner families: The importance of work stress and family stress for psychological well being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 211-223.
49.
Sengenberger, W. (1995). Employment protection and employment security. In W. Sengenberger & D. Campbell (Eds.), Creating economic opportunities: The role of labour standards in industrial restructuring. Geneva: Institute for Labour Studies.
50.
Smyth, M. , & Robus, N. (1989). The functional circumstances of families with disabled children living in private households report. London: HMSO.
51.
Social Services Inspectorate. (1994). Services to disabled children and their families: Report of the national inspection of services to disabled children and their families. London: HMSO.
52.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Thompson, L. , & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-872.
54.
Tizard, B. (1991). Working mothers. In A. Phoenix, A. Woollett, & E. Lloyd (Eds.), Motherhood: Meanings, practices and ideologies (pp. 178-194). London: Sage Ltd.
55.
Trausdottir, R. (1991). Mothers who care. Gender, disability and family life. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 211-228.
56.
Uttal, L. (1996). Custodial care, surrogate care and co-ordinated care: Employed mothers and the meaning of childcare. Gender and Society, 10, 291-311.
57.
Van Duk, L. , & Siegers, J. (1996). The division of childcare among mothers, fathers and nonparental care providers in Dutch two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 1018-1027.
58.
Ward, C. , Dale, A., & Joshi, H. (1996). Combining employment with childcare: An escape from dependence. Journal of Social Policy, 25, 223-247.
59.
Zvonkovik, A. M. , Greaves, K. M., Schmiege, J., & Hall, L. D. (1996). The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 91-100.
