Among the key problems of “humanitarian intervention” in international law and international relations are the dynamics of sovereignty and the question of selectivity in intervention. The causes of conflict in the major cases of “humanitarian intervention,” former Yugoslavia, Somalia and Rwanda, are discussed under several headings: the end of the cold war; economics and scapegoating; ethnic politics?; media war; external influences; and politics of displacement. Ethnicity, although generally considered a cause of conflict, is not an explanation but rather that which is to be explained. The terminology of ethnicity is part of the conflict and cannot serve as a language of analysis. The core causes of conflict are authoritarian institutions and political cultures and the politics of hard sovereignty, while external influences play a significant role. Revisiting “humanitarian intervention” in this light, it clearly provides no solution for structural problems. The crucial problems, democratization and the fundamental restructuring of state-society relations, are not even on the agenda for they fall outside the parameters of conventional wisdom, which is trained to think in terms of state sovereignty, national interest, international security. “Humanitarian intervention” reinforces authoritarianism, hard sovereignty, militarization. For “humanitarian intervention” to contribute to conflict resolution, what is required are postconventional political options such as new types of state, partial forms of sovereignty and democratization. Meanwhile “humanitarian intervention” offers a mirror of global politics as they actually exist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
African Rights (1994a). “Humanitarianism Unbound?” Discussion Paper 5, London.
2.
African Rights (1994b). Rwanda: Death, Despair and Defiance.London.
3.
Ahmed, A.J. (ed.) (1995). The Invention of Somalia.Lawrenceville, NJ: Red Sea Press.
4.
Arato, A. and S. Benhabib (1994). “The Tragedy of Yugoslavia.”Praxis International, 13 (4): 325-331.
5.
Banac, I. (1992). “The Fearful Asymmetry of War: The Causes and Consequences of Yugoslavia's Demise.”Daedalus, Spring: 141-171.
6.
Barzani, M. (1993). “Hope Restored: Benefits of Humanitarian Intervention.”Harvard International Review, 16 (1): 18-20.
7.
Bell-Fialkoff, A. (1993). “A Brief History of Ethnic Cleansing.”Foreign Affairs, 72 (3): 110-121.
8.
Bose, S. (1995). “State Crises and Nationalities Conflict in Sri Lanka and Yugoslavia.”Comparative Political Studies, 28 (1): 87-116.
9.
Bothe, M. (1994). “Peacekeeping and the Use of Force.”International Peacekeeping, 1 (1): 1-5.
10.
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1993). “Setting an Agenda for the United Nations.”Journal of International Affairs, 46 (2): 289-298.
11.
Boyd, C.G. (1995). “Making Peace with the Guilty.”Foreign Affairs, 74 (5): 22-38.
12.
Braeckman, C. (1994). Rwanda: Histoire d'un génocide.Paris: Fayard.
13.
Brückner, P. (1994). “Europe and the Serbian Aggression.”Praxis International, 13 (4): 339-345.
14.
Chalk, F. and K. Jonassohn (1990). The History and Sociology of Genocide.New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
15.
Clark, W.S. (1995). Humanitarian Intervention in Somalia: Bibliography.Carlisle Barracks, PA: Center for Strategic Leadership, US Army War College.
16.
Crocker, C.A. (1995). “The Lessons of Somalia: Not Everything went Wrong.”Foreign Affairs, 74 (3): 2-8.
17.
Deng, F. (1995). “Reconciling Sovereignty with Responsibility: A Basis for International Humanitarian Action.” In Africa in World Politics: Post-Cold War Challenges, (J.W. Harbeson and D. Rothchild, eds.), pp. 295-310. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Denitch, B. (1994). Ethnic Nationalism: The Tragic Death of Yugoslavia.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Doornbos, M. (1994). “Pasture and Polis: The Roots of Political Marginalization of Somali Pastoralism.” In Conflict and the Decline of Pastoralism in the Horn of Africa, (J. Markakis, ed.), pp. 100-121. London: Macmillan.
20.
Doornbos, M. and J. Markakis (1994). “Society and State in Crisis: What went wrong in Somalia?” In Crisis Management and the Politics of Reconciliation in Somalia (M.A. Mohamed Salih and L. Wohlgemut, eds), pp. 12-18. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
21.
Duffield, M. (1996). “The Globalisation of Public Policy: Managing the Systemic Crisis in the South.” University of Birmingham, School of Public Policy.
22.
Duffield, M. and J. Prendergast (1994). “Sovereignty and Intervention after the Cold War.”Middle East Report, 24 (2-3): 9-24.
23.
Flere, S. (1992). “Cognitive Adequacy of Sociological Theories in Explaining Ethnic Antagonism in Yugoslavia.” In Ethnicity and Conflict in a Post-Communist World, (K. Rupesinghe, P. King and O. Vorkunova, eds), pp. 251-270. New York: St Martin's Press.
24.
Gillespie, T.R. (1993). “Unwanted Responsibility: Humanitarian Military Intervention to Advance Human Rights.”Peace and Change, 18 (3): 219-246.
25.
Glenny, M. (1995). “Yugoslavia: The Great Fall.”New York Review, 23 March: 56-65.
26.
Golubovic, Z. (1992). “The Conditions Leading to the Breakdown of the Yugoslav State.”Praxis International, 12 (2): 129-144.
27.
Haekkerup, H. (1993). “The Nordic Track.”Harvard International Review, 16(1): 22-24.
28.
Henricson-Cullberg, M.et al. (1991). After Yugoslavia What?Lund: The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research.
29.
Humphrey, M. (1994). “Civil War, Ethnicity and Globalisation.” Unpublished paper.
30.
Humphrey, M. (1995). “Violence, Identity and the City.” Unpublished paper.
31.
Keen, S. (1986). Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
32.
Laber, J. (1993). “Bosnia: Questions about Rape.”New York Review of Books, 25 March: 3-6.
33.
Lapidoth, R. (1992). “Sovereignty in Transition.”Journal of International Affairs, 45 (2): 325-346.
34.
Lemarchand, R. (1994). “Managing Transition Anarchies: Rwanda, Burundi, and South Africa in Comparative Perspective.”Journal of Modern African Studies, 32 (4): 581-604.
35.
Mawlawi, F. (1993). “New Conflicts, New Challenges: The Evolving Role of Non-Governmental Actors.”Journal of International Affairs, 46 (2): 391-414.
36.
Mayall, J. and M. Simpson (1992). “Ethnicity is Not Enough: Reflections on Protracted Secessionism in the Third World.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33 (1-2): 5-25.
37.
Melcić, D. (1994). “The Balkans and Europe—A Philosophical Problem?”Praxis International, 13 (4): 332-338.
38.
Mestrović, S.T. (1994). The Balkanization of the West.London: Routledge.
Mohamoud, A.A. (1995). “Theoretical and Conceptual Overview of the Conflict in Somalia.” Unpublished paper.
45.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (1989). Empire and Emancipation.New York: Praeger.
46.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (1996). “Varieties of Ethnic Experience and Ethnicity Discourse.” In The Politics of Difference: Ethnic Premises in a World of Power (E.N. Wilmsen and P. McAllister, eds), pp. 25-44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Øberg, J. (1994). Former Yugoslavia: Lessons for UN Members.Lund: Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research.
48.
Parekh, B. (1993). “Beyond Humanitarian Intervention.” In Politics and Law of Former Yugoslavia, (H. Cullen, D. Kritsiotis, N. Wheeler, eds), pp 11-25. Hull: European Community Research Unit, University of Hull.
49.
Reimer, J. (1994). “Future Probabilities for a Somali Nation State: Development and Governance.”Alternate Routes, 11: 5-29.
50.
Report of the Commission on Global Governance (1995), Our Global Neighbourhood.New York, Oxford University Press.
51.
Rieff, D. (1995). Slaughterhouse: Bosnia and the Failure of the West.London: Vintage.
52.
Roberts, A. (1993). “The Road to Hell.. .A Critique of Humanitarian Intervention.”Harvard International Review, 16 (1): 10-14.
53.
Robinson, I. (1995). “Globalization and Democracy.”Dissent, Summer: 373-380.
54.
Rosenau, J.N. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics.Brighton: Harvester.
55.
Shaw, M. (1994). Global Society and International Relations.Cambridge: Polity Press.
56.
Silva, P.L. de (1993). “Cultural Constructions of Political Violence: Conflict in Sri Lanka.” Amsterdam: Free University MA Thesis.
57.
Smyth, F. (1994). “Cashing in on Rwanda's Genocide.”New Statesman and Society, 29 July: 16-17.
58.
Stanton, K. (1993). “Pitfalls of Intervention: Sovereignty as a Foundation of Human Rights.”Harvard International Review, 16 (1): 14-16.
59.
Strange, S. (1995). “The Defective State.”Daedalus, Spring: 55-74.
60.
Thomas, C. (1994). “Human Rights and Intervention: A Case for Caution.”Irish Studies in International Affairs, 5: 15-28.
61.
Vejvoda, I. (1994). “Yugoslavia and the Empty Place of Power.”Praxis International, 13 (4): 346-353.
62.
Vincent, J. (1992). “Modernity and Universal Human Rights.” In Global Politics, (A. McGrew and P.G. Lewiset al, eds), pp 269-292. Cambridge: Polity Press.
