Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

One theme runs through the various articles in this issue of the IPSR, either explicitly or by implication—the “common good.” A second theme is inclusion and exclusion, that is, the group system judged in terms of some standard of public equity. Based on American material, this article tries to bring the two lines of argument together in order to elucidate the contours of “private representation.” It does so by analyzing how contemporary political thought has dealt with three problems: the distinction between special and public interests; principles of group classification, which have attracted renewed attention in recent years; and the concept of public interest groups, in the behavioral redefinition of the term.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beer, S.H. (1978). “In Search of a New Public Philosophy.” In The New American Political System ( A. King , ed.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Berry, J. (1977). Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dahl, R. (1986). Democracy, Liberty, and Equality. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

Epstein, L.D. (1978). “The Old States in a New System.” In The New American Political System ( A. King , ed.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Farneti, P. (1971). Sistema politico e società civile. Saggi di teoria e ricerca politica. Torino: Giappichelli.

Graziano, L. (1995). Lobbying pluralismo democrazia. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.

Key, V.O. (1964). Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups (5th ed.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.

Lowi, T.J. (1979). The End of Liberalism. The Second Republic of the United States (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

McCann, M.W. (1986). Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

10.

Nelson, R.L. , J.P. Heinz , E.O. Laumann , and R.H. Salisbury (1987). “Private Representation in Washington: Surveying the Structure of Influence.” American Bar Association Research Journal, Winter (1).

11.

Olson, M., Jr. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Petracca, M.P. (ed.) (1992). The Politics of Interests. Interest Groups Transformed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

13.

Ranney, A. (1978). “The Political Parties: Reform and Decline.” In The New American Political System ( A. King , ed.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

14.

Salisbury, R.H. (1990). “Interest Advocacy and Interest Representation.” Paper presented at the International Colloquium of the Feltrinelli Foundation on Pluralism and Democracy, Cortona, Italy, 29-31 May.

15.

Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

16.

Schattschneider, E.E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

17.

Schlozman, K.L. and J.T. Tierney (1986). Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

18.

Sorauf, F.J. (1990). “PACs and American Pluralism.” Paper presented at the International Colloquium of the Feltrinelli Foundation on Pluralism and Democracy, Cortona, Italy, 29-31 May.

19.

Von Gierke, O. (1990). Community in Historical Perspective ( A. Black , ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Walker, J.L., Jr (1991). Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

21.

Weisbrod, B.A. (ed.) (1978). Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

On Special Interests,Public Interests,and Unequal Representation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References