Abstract
The Nordic countries are often portrayed as belonging to a separate welfare regime, characterized by “institutional” welfare arrangements crowding out private welfare. However, a closer look reveals important differences in the public/private welfare mix. By focusing on pension politics in particular, the article argues that these policy differences stem from institutional differences which have shaped the pension-political game differently in the various Nordic countries. It then uses an account of political developments there as a stepping stone in order to discuss a general problem in political science: how to explain political change without losing sight of the connection between the micro and macro levels of analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
