The article outlines a method to measure the effect which international regimes have on solving global environmental problems such as global climate change. By using political-economic cost/benefit analysis, a no-regime counterfactual and a collective optimum (lower and upper bounds) are derived. By comparing the actual performance of a regime to these bounds, a simple coefficient of regime effectiveness can be computed. After theoretically deriving the various bounds, the authors discuss the determining factors and provide guidance on how such a research agenda could be pursued empirically. The authors conclude with suggestions to further refine the measurement concept and its merit for public policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bruce, J. P.et al. (eds.) (1996). Climate Change 1995—Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Chayes, A. and A. H. Chayes (1991). “Compliance Without Enforcement: State Behavior Under Regulatory Treaties.”Negotiation Journal, 7(3): 311-330.
3.
Chayes, A. and A. H. Chayes (1993). “On Compliance.”International Organization, 47(2): 175-205.
4.
Fearon, J. D. (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,”World Politics, 43(4): 169-195.
5.
Gehring, T. (1994). Dynamic International Environmental Regimes: Institutions for International Environmental Governance. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
6.
Haas, P. (1989). “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control.”International Organization, 43(3): 377-403.
7.
Haas, P.et al. (eds.) (1993). Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Hanf, K. and A. Underdal (eds.) (forthcoming). International Environmental Agreements and Domestic Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate.
9.
Hasenclever, A.et al. (1996). “Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes.”Mershon International Studies Review, 40(Supplement 2): 177-228.
10.
Helm, C. and D. Sprinz (1999) “Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” PIK-Report 52 (May). Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam. [http://www.pik-potsdam.de]
11.
Jacobeit, C. (1998). “Wirksamkeit in der internationalen Umweltpolitik [Effectiveness in the Field of International Environmental Policy].”Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 5(2): 345-366.
12.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony—Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Keohane, R. O.et al. (1993). “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions.” In Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, (P. M. Haaset al., eds.) pp. 3-24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Keohane, R. O. and M. A. Levy (eds.) (1996). Institutions for Environmental Aid. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye (1989). Power and Interdependence. New York: HarperCollins.
16.
Mäler, K. G. (1990). “International Environmental Problems.”Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1(1): 79-108.
17.
Martin, L. L. and B. A. Simmons (1998). “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.”International Organization, 54(4): 729-757.
18.
Nordhaus, W. D. and Z. Yang (1996). “A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies.”American Economic Review, 86(4): 741-765.
19.
Oberthür, S. (1997). Umweltschutz durch internationale Regime: Interessen, Verhandlungsprozesse, Wirkungen [Environmental Protection Resulting from International Regimes: Interests, Negotiation Processes, Impacts]. Opladen; Leske & Budrich.
20.
Pastor, M. and C. Wise (1994). “The Origins and Sustainability of Mexico’s Free Trade Policy.”International Organization48(3): 459-489.
21.
Rittberger, V. (ed.) (1995). Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22.
Schreurs, M. A. and E. C. Economy (eds.) (1997). The Internationalization of Environmental Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Sprinz, D. F. (1997). “Environmental Security and Instrument Choice.” In Conflict and the Environment (N.P. Gleditsch, ed.), pp. 483-502. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
Sprinz, D. F. (1998). “Internationale Klimapolitik” [International Climate Policy]. Die Friedens-Warte—Blätter für internationale Verständigung und zwischenstaatliche Organisation, 73(1): 25-44.
25.
Sprinz, D. F. (1999). “Research on the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: A Review of the State of the Art.” Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, 16-20 February 1999, Washington, DC.
26.
Sprinz, D. F. and G. E. Churkina (1998). “The Analysis of Environmental Thresholds.” Paper presented at the Third Pan-European International Relations Conference and Joint Meeting of the European Standing Group for International Relations (ECPR) with the International Studies Association (ISA), 16-19 September 1998, Economics University of Vienna (WUW), Vienna, Austria.
27.
Sprinz, D. F. and U. Luterbacher (eds.) (1996). “International Relations and Global Climate Change.”Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK Report #21).
28.
Sprinz, D. F. and T. Vaahtoranta (1994). “The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy.”International Organization, 48(1): 77-105.
29.
Tetlock, P. E. and A. Belkin (eds.) (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics— Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
Tietenberg, T. (1992). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. New York: HarperCollins.
31.
Underdal, A. (1992). “The Concept of Regime ‘Effectiveness’.”Cooperation and Conflict, 27(3): 227-240.
32.
Underdal, A. (1997). “Patterns of Effectiveness: Examining Evidence from 13 International Regimes,’ Paper presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, 19-22 March 1997, Toronto, Ontario.
33.
Victor, D. G.et al. (eds.) (1998). The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Watson, R. T.et al. (eds.) (1996). Climate Change 1995—Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Weiss, E. B. and H. K. Jacobson (eds.) (1998). Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Young, O. R. (1989a). International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
Young, O. R. (1989b). “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment.”International Organization, 43(3): 349-375.
38.
Young, O. R. (ed.) (forthcoming). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: The Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Young, O. R. and M. A. Levy (forthcoming). “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes.” In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: The Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms (O. R. Young, ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Young, O. R. and G. Osherenko (eds.) (1993). Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
Zürn, M. (1998). “The Rise of International Environmental Politics—A Review of Current Research.”World Politics, 50(4): 617-649.
