Due to an enhanced global environmental awareness reinforced by dramatic environmental events, international conferences on the environment and development, as well as academic research and publications, have increasingly shifted the developmental discourse toward the concept of “sustainable development.” In developing countries, however, the realization of the notion of sustainable development has come under challenge due to the emergence of neo-liberal regimes and their pro-market policies. The current article addresses the following issues in this context: the origin, meaning, and problems of sustainable development; the major features and policy orientations of neo-liberal regimes in developing countries; and the critical implications of neo-liberal policies for the environment and development. The article also offers some recommendations with a view to overcoming the contemporary challenges to sustainability and ensuring a more genuine and effective mode of sustainable development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babai, D. (1988). “The World Bank and the IMF: Rolling Back the State or Backing Its Role?” In The Promise of Privatization: A Challenge for U.S. Policy (R. Vernon, ed.). New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
2.
Baker, P. and H. Dewar (1997). “Long Road Ahead for Global Warming Pact.”Washington Post, 12 December, p. A01.
3.
Barrow, C.J. (1995). “Sustainable Development: Concept, Value and Practice.”Third World Planning Review, 17 (4): 369-386.
4.
Bello, W. , S. Cunningham, and B. Rau (1994), Dark Victory: The United States, Structural Adjustment and Global Poverty. London: Pluto Press.
5.
Bloomstrom, M. and B. Hettne (1984). Development Theory in Transition. London: Zed Books.
6.
Boxill, I. (1994). “Globalization, Sustainable Development, and Postmodernism: The New Ideology of Imperialism.”Humanity and Society, 18 (4): 3-18.
7.
Brohman, J. (1995). “Universalism, Eurocentrism, and Ideological Bias in Development Studies: From Modernization to Neo-liberalism.”Third World Quarterly, 16 (1): 121-140.
8.
Brown, L.R. (1990). “The Illusion of Progress.” In State of the World, 1990. (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
9.
Brown, L.R. , C. Flavin, and S. Postel (1990). “Picturing a Sustainable Society.” In State of the World, 1990. (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
10.
Chaudhry, K.A. (1994). “Economic Liberalization and the Lineages of the Rentier State.”Comparative Politics, 27 (1): 1-25.
11.
Chilcote, R.H. (1984). Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12.
Chodak, S. (1973). Societal Development: Five Approaches with Conclusions From Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Colclough, C. (1991). “Structuralism versus Neo-Liberalism: An Introduction.” In States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate (C. Colclough and J. Manor, eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Cook, P. and C. Kirkpatrick (1995). “Privatization Policy and Performance.” In Privatization Policy and Performance: International Perspectives (P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick, eds.). London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15.
Cooper, P.J. (1995). “Inside-Out Management: Public Administration, Sustainable Development, and Environmental Policy.” In Implementing Sustainable Development (United Nations Department for Development Support and Management Services, ed.). New York: UNDDSMS.
16.
Cowan, L.G. (1990). Privatization in the Developing World. New York: Greenwood Press.
17.
Daly, H.E. (1990). “Sustainable Growth: An Impossibility Theorem.”Development, (3-4): 45-47.
18.
Devlin, J. and N.T. Yap, (1994). “Sustainable Development and the NICs: Cautionary Tales for the South in the New World (Dis)Order.”Third World Quarterly, 15 (1): 49-62.
19.
Donahue, J.D. (1989). The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Dovers, S. (1989). “Sustainability: Definitions, Clarifications and Contexts.”Development, (2-3): 33-36.
21.
Durning, A.B. (1990). “Ending Poverty.” In State of the World, 1990. (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
22.
Durning, A.B. (1991). “Asking How Much is Enough.” In State of the World, 1991. (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
23.
Easterbrook, G. (1997). “Hot Air Treaty.”U.S. News, 22 December.
24.
The Economist (1992). “Fear of Finance.” 19 September, pp. 5-9.
25.
The Economist (1995). “Miracle Unmasked.” 9 December, pp. 4-6.
26.
Espinal, R. (1992). “Development, Neo-liberalism and Electoral Politics in Latin America.”Development and Change, 23 (4): 27-48.
27.
Estes, R.J. (1988). Trends in World Development: The Social Progress of Nationals, 1970-1987. New York: Praeger.
28.
Estes, R.J. (1993). “Toward Sustainable Development: From Theory to Praxis.”Social Development Issues, 15 (3): 1-29.
29.
Fitzgerald, R. (1988). When Government Goes Private: Successful Alternatives to Public Services. New York: Universe Books.
30.
French, H.F. (1990). “Clearing the Air.” In State of the World, 1990. (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
31.
Fuller, T. (1994). “Looming Battle of the (Television) Bands.”International Herald Tribune, 19 September,.p. IX.
32.
George, S. (1977). How the Other Half Dies. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun & Co.
33.
Gotlieb, Y. (1996). Development, Environment and Global Dysfunction: Towards Sustainable Development. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
34.
Halachmi, A. and M. Holzer (1993). “Towards a Competitive Public Administration.”International Review of Administrative Sciences, 59 (1): 29-45.
35.
Haque, M.S. (1996a). “The Intellectual Crisis in Public Administration in the Current Epoch of Privatization.”Administration & Society, 27 (4): 510-536.
36.
Haque, M.S. (1996b). “Public Service Under Challenge in the Age of Privatization.”Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 9 (2): 186-216.
37.
Haque, M.S. (1998). Restructuring Development Theories and Policies: A Critical Study. Albany: The State University of New York Press.
38.
Harvey, C. (1991). “Recovery from Macro-economic Disaster in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate (C. Colclough and J. Manor, eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Heald, D. (1990). “The Relevance of Privatization to Developing Economies.”Public Administration and Development, 10 (1): 3-18.
40.
Hempel, L.C. (1996). Environmental Governance: The Global Challenge. Washington, DC: Island Press.
41.
ILO (International Labour Office) . (1976). Employment, Growth and Basic Needs: A One-World Problem. Geneva: International Labour Office.
42.
Itty, C.I. (1984). “Development Goals and Values.” In Searching for Asian Paradigms (C.I. Itty, ed.). Bangkok: Asian Cultural Forum on Development.
43.
Jacob, M. (1994). “Toward a Methodological Critique of Sustainable Development.”Journal of Developing Areas, 28 (2): 237-252.
44.
James, V.U. (1996). “Introduction: Planning for Sustainable Development in the Third World.” In Sustainable Development in Third World Countries (V.U. James, ed.). Westport, CT.: Praeger.
45.
Jung, H.Y. (1991)., “Marxism and Deep Ecology in Postmodernity: From Homo Oeconomicus to Homo Ecologicus.”Thesis Eleven, 28: 86-99.
46.
Kabeer, N. and J. Humphrey (1991). “Neo-liberalism, Gender, and the Limits of the Market.” In States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate (C. Colclough and J. Manor, eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Kadekodi, G.K. (1992). “Paradigms of Sustainable Development.”Development, (3): 72-76.
48.
Kim, D.H. (1984). Development theories and strategies: Critical perspectives. Seoul, Korea: Sung Kyun Kwan University Press.
49.
King, D.S. (1987). The New Right: Politics, Markets and Citizenship. Chicago, IL.: Dorsey Press.
50.
Korten, D.C. (1990). Getting to the 21st Century. West Hartford, CT: Kumerian Press.
51.
Lafferty, W.M. (1984). “Workplace Democratization in Norway: Current Status and Future Prospects with Special Emphasis on the Role of the Public Sector.”Acta Sociologica, 27 (2): 123-138.
52.
Leftwich, A. (1994). “Governance, the State and the Politics of Development.”Development and Change, 25: 363-386.
Lemonick, M.D. (1997). “Turning Down the Heat.”Time Magazine, 150(26), 22 December.
55.
Linowes, D.F. (1988). Privatization: Toward More Effective Government—Report of the President’s Commission on Privatization. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
56.
Manor, J. (1991). “Politics and the Neo-liberals.” In (C. Colclough and J. Manor, eds.). States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Martin, B. (1993). In the Public Interest: Privatization and Public Sector Reform. London: Zed Books.
58.
Naito, Y. (1997). “Kyoto Could Have Achieved Much More, Expert Says.”Japan Times, 12 December.
59.
Noman, O. (1996). Economic Development and Environmental Policy. London: Kegan Paul International.
60.
Nudler, O. (1986). “The Human Element as Means and Ends of Development.” In Human Development: The Neglected Dimension (K. Haq and U. Kirdar, eds.). Islamabad, Pakistan: North South Roundtable.
61.
Onis, Z. (1995). “The Limits of Neo-liberalism: Toward a Reformulation of Development Theory.”Journal of Economic Issues, 19 (1): 97-119.
62.
Pai, S. (1994). “Transition from Command to Market Economy: Privatization in Brazil and Argentina.” In Structural Adjustment, Public Policy and Bureaucracy in Developing Societies. (R.B. Jain and H. Bongartz, eds.). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications.
63.
Postel, S. and L. Heise (1988). “Reforesting the Earth.” In State of the World, 1988 (Worldwatch Institute). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
64.
Preston, P.W. (1985). New Trends in Development Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
65.
Ramphal, S. (1992). “In a North-South Gap, Seeds of Environment Discord.”International Herald Tribune, 24 January, p. 4.
66.
Randall, V. and R. Theobald (1985). Political Change and Underdevelopment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
67.
Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. London: Methuen.
68.
Reed, D. (1996). Structural Adjustment, the Environment, and Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan.
69.
Reid, D. (1995). Sustainable Development: An Introductory Guide. London: Earthscan.
70.
Rensberger, B. (1994). “In Cairo, a Chance to Slow the Population Express Train.”International Herald Tribune, 5 September, pp. 1, 4.
71.
Routh, G. (1975). The Origin of Economic Ideas. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.
72.
Ruccio, D.F. and L.H. Simon (1986). “Methodological Aspects of a Marxian Approach to Development: An Analysis of the Modes of Production School.”World Development, 14 (2): 211-222.
73.
Sachs, W. (1992). “Introduction.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. (W. Sachs, ed.). London: Zed Books.
74.
Sader, F. (1993). “Privatization and Foreign Investment in the Developing World, 1988-92,” Working Paper (WPS 1202). Washington, DC: World Bank.
75.
Sargent, L.T. (1990). Contemporary Political Ideologies: A Comparative Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
76.
Sharma, K.C. (1994). “Africa’s Economic Crisis, Public Policies of Structural Adjustment Programmes, Considerations for Political Restructuring and Role of Public Service Bureaucracies.” In Structural Adjustment, Public Policy and Bureaucracy in Developing Societies (R.B. Jain and H. Bongartz, eds.). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications.
77.
Shaw, T.M. (1991). “Reformism, Revisionism, and Radicalism in African Political Economy during the 1990s.”Journal of Modern African Studies, 29 (2): 191-212.
78.
Simonis, U.E. (1990). Beyond Growth: Elements of Sustainable Development. Berlin: Sigma.
79.
Smith, B. (1991). “The Changing Role of Government in Comparative Perspective.” In The Changing Role of Government: Management of Social and Economic Activities (B.C. Smith, ed.). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
80.
Stokke, Olav (1991). “Sustainable Development: A Multi-Faceted Challenge.”European Journal of Development Research, 3 (1): 8-31.
81.
Streeten, P. (1979). “A Basic-Needs Approach to Economic Development.” In Directions in Economic Development (K.P. Jameson and C.K. Wilber, eds.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
82.
Tevera, D. (1995). “The Medicine that Might Kill the Patient: Structural Adjustment and Urban Poverty in Zimbabwe.” In Structurally Adjusted Africa: Poverty, Debt and Basic Needs (D. Simonet al., eds.). London: Pluto Press.
83.
Torre, J.C. (1993). “The Politics of Economic Crisis in Latin America.”Journal of Democracy, 4 (1): 104-116.
84.
Toye, J. (1991). “Is There a New Political Economy of Development?” In States or Markets? Neo-liberalism and the Development Policy Debate (C. Colclough and J. Manor, eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
85.
Trainer, T. (1989). Developed to Death: Rethinking Third World Development. London: Green Print.
86.
Ullrich, O. (1992). “Technology.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power (W. Sachs, ed.). London: Zed Books.
87.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1994). Human Development Report, 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.
88.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1996). Human Development Report, 1996. New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1997). Human Development Report, 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
90.
Veltmeyer, H. (1993). “Liberalisation and Structural Adjustment in Latin America: In Search of an Alternative.”Economic and Political Weekly, 25September, pp. 2080-2086.
91.
Walton, J. and D. Seddon (1994). Free Markets & Food Riots: The Politics of Global Adjustment. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
92.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
93.
Weaver, J.H. (ed.). (1973). Modern Political Economy. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
94.
Wise, C.R. (1990). “Public Service Configurations and Public Organizations: Public Organization Design in the Post-Privatization Era.”Public Administration Review, 50 (2): 141-155.
95.
World Bank . (1991). World Development Report, 1991: The Challenge of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
96.
Xing, L. (1995). “State, Market and Authoritarianism in East Asia: A Development and Ideological Challenge?”Scandinavian Journal of Development Alternatives, 14 (4): 35-55.
