Abstract
The impact of neoconservative ideas has varied considerably among Western nations. This paper examines some of the factors at work by exploring Canadian experience. Despite the election of conservative governments at the federal level and in several provinces, the conse quences for social policy have been more limited than elsewhere. The reasons for this pattern are embedded in distinctive features of the polit ical economy of the Canadian welfare state. Most importantly, the inten sity of linguistic and regional divisions within the fragile federal system, and the country's marginal position in the international trading regime constrain a radical neoconservative agenda. Studies of neoconservatism in states that are relatively large and integrated on the territorial dimension risk taking these factors for granted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
