Abstract
This article suggests that a cumulative process has generated a growing segmentation of the social space along ethno-cultural lines in polyethnic societies over the last century. The concomitant rise of egalitarianism as a modern democratic dogma has tended to produce a heightened degree of tension and envy at the intercultural interface and to trigger violence. The authors examine a number of alternative ways that have been used to manage the intercultural interface and to contain violence. They are led to propose a new social contract built on the principle "different but united" and rooted in an explicit civil theology. Such a contract would provide for hierarchies, separateness, and complementar ities in institutional forms to reduce envy and contain violence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
