Referring to the national or regional level it is quite commonplace to acknowledge the existence of different types of social relations and structures, many traditional ones and some of more recent origin. The paper argues that with regard to the world-level, the concept of a modern world society has made some progress over the last few decades in contrast to and in competition with tradional state-centered and segmented world views.
Only small minorities of the national populations hold internationalist values and convictions commensurate with a modern world society perspective. Results from the only (but somewhat dated) relevant world-wide survey of the various publics' attitudes towards the United Nations system illustrate the point.
Evidence from various social-science disciplines substantiates the view that it is longer formal education that enhances an individual's capacity to accept highly abstract and encompassing values and handle corresponding cognitive information. The world-wide educational expansion of the last few decades is interpreted as having widened the value foundations of multilateralism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alger, C.F. (1980). "The US Public and the UN: Moving the Public from 'We believe' to 'We participate'."Background paper for the UNA-USA Project on "The UN at 35". New York: UNA-UN
2.
Baumert, J. and J. Naumann, (1990). Bildung und politische Orientierung in Europa . Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.
3.
Bellah, R.N. (1966). "Religious Evolution." In Reading in Social Evolution and Development (S.N. Eisenstadt, Ed.) pp. 211-214. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
4.
Bowen, H.R. (1977). Investment in Learning. The Individual and Social Values of American Higher Education. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
5.
Dalton R.J. (1981). "The Persistence of Values and Life Cycle Changes."Politische Psychologie, Sonderheft12, 189-207.
6.
Fiala, R. and A.G. Lanford (1987). "Educational Ideology and the World Educational Revolution 1950-1970."Comparative Education Review31 (3): 315-332.
7.
Gallup Organization (1977a). Human Needs and Satisfactions. A Global Survey. (Summary Volume). Princeton, NJ.: Gallup International.
8.
Gallup Organization (1977b). Human Needs and Satisfactions. Selected Cross-Tabulations. Princeton, N.J.: Gallup International .
9.
Hero, A.O. (1977). "The United States Public and the United Nations." In The Changing United Nations: Options for the United States, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 32 (4): 17-29.
10.
Hoffmann-Lange, U. (1986). "Eliten zwischen Alter und Neuer Politik. Konstanz und Wandel der Konfliktlinien in den Eliten der Bundesrepublik." In Wahlen und politischer Prozess. Analysen aus Anlaß der Bundestagswahl 1983. (H.D. Klingemann, and M. Kaase, Eds.): Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
11.
Hüfner, K.J.Meyer, and J. Naumann (1987). "Comparative Education Policy Research: A World Society Perspective." In Comparative Policy Research. Learning from Experience. (M. Dierkes, H. Weiler, and A.B. Antal, Eds.) Aldershot : Gower.
12.
Inglehart, R. (1983). "Traditionelle politische Trennungslinien und die Entwicklung der neuen Politik in westlichen Gesellschaften"Politische Vierteljahresschrift24 (2): 139-165.
13.
Inglehart, R. (1985). "Aggregate Stability and Individual-level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox"American Political Science Review, 79 (1): 97-116
14.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). "Moral Stages and Moralization. The Cognitive-Developmental Approach." In Moral Development and Behavior , (T. Lickona, Ed.): New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15.
Ladd, E.C. and S.M. Lipset (1975). The Divided Academy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Lipset, S.M. (1982). "The Academic Mind at the Top: The Political Behavior and Values of Faculty Elites."Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 143-168.
17.
Meyer, J.W. et a l (1977). "The World Education Revolution."Sociology of Education50: 242-258.
18.
Naumann, J. (1986). Value Orientations of Professionals in Different Academic Fields. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institute for Human Development and Education (mimeograph).
19.
Naumann, J. (1987). "The United Nations System and Public Opinion." In Peace, Security, Public Opinion Attitudes. Geneva: World Federation of United Nations Associations .
20.
Naumann, J.J.Baumert, P.M.Roeder, and L. Trommer (1987). Leistungshierarchien, Reputationdifferenzen und Fachkulturen. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.
21.
Naumann, J. and K. Hüfner (1985). "Evolutionary Aspects of Social and Individual Development: Comments and Illustrations from the World System Perspective." In Individual Development and Social Change. Explanatory Analysis. (J.R. Nesselroade and A. von Eye, Eds.) Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22.
PACE International Affairs (1985). "Britons want to give the United Nations another Chance to Succeed."Press Release, 20 September.
23.
Parsons, T. (1969). "Order and Community in the International Social System" and "On the Concept of Value Commitments." In Politics and Social Structure. (T. Parsons, Ed.). pp. 292-310; 439-472New York: The Free Press.
24.
Parsons, T. (1978). "Belief, Unbelief, and Disbelief." In Action Theory and the Human Condition. (T. Parsons, Ed.). pp. 233-263. New York: The Free Press.
25.
Perez de Cuellar, J. (1987). "Multilateralism—A Continuing Necessity." In United Nations: Press Release SG/SM/776 , May 20.
26.
Rest, J.R. and S.J. Thoma (1985). "Relation of Moral Judgement Development to Formal Education."Developmental Psychology21 (4): 709-714
27.
Rielly, J. (Ed.) (1983). American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1983. Chicago: The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
28.
Riggs, R.E. and I.J. Mykletun (1979). Beyona Functionalism. Attitudes towards International Organizations in Norway and the United States. Oslo: Universitetforlaget.
29.
Stoetzel, J. ( 1983). Les valeurs du temps présent. Une enquête européenne . Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
