Abstract
How do ethnic cleavages impact unarmed resistance campaigns? Recent scholarship has observed that members of ethnic minorities have achieved lower rates of success when employing nonviolent tactics than members of dominant groups. These studies have frequently proposed mechanisms, but few have tested whether dynamics in real-world cases align with these mechanisms. This paper presents a comparative case analysis of two movements in Pakistan—the Lawyers’ Movement of 2007–2009 and the ongoing Pashtun Tahafuz Movement—drawing on original interviews with activists from both movements. It offers an in-depth examination of how ethnicity impacts dynamics of mobilization, regime response, and transnational support. The findings shed new light on the unique obstacles minorities face when using nonviolent tactics as well as alternative strategies that might help overcome them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
