How do authoritarian rulers make foreign policy decisions? Building on the triangulation of three qualitative research methods, I advance a theoretical construct that deconstructs authoritarian regimes’ decision-making processes in foreign policy. Drawing inspiration from al-Sisi’s foreign policy, this study argues that authoritarian rulers adopt three types of decision-making tools, which consist of structural control, the prioritization of securing external support and elite material benefits over citizens’ wellbeing, and the repression of opponents beyond national borders. Although scholars have emphasized authoritarian regimes’ instrumentalization of foreign policy as a means of rule consolidation, they have overlooked their prevalent decision-making mechanisms and tools. Building on an inductive research approach, this study triangulates data collected using 3 qualitative research methods, 20 open-ended and semi-structured expert interviews, the analysis of newsfeed content, and discourse analysis of al-Sisi speeches from 2014 to 2024. A rigorous cross-validation of data confirmed the replicability of al-Sisi’s threefold foreign policy decision-making tools across authoritarian and hybrid regimes.
Abdel-GawadGamal (1999) Egypt and the Arab World. In SaeedMohamed (ed.) Egypt’s Renaissance and the International System: Confrontation or Maneuver. Cairo: Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, 51–107.
2.
Abdel-NasserGamal (1954) The Philosophy of the Revolution. Cairo: Information Agency.
3.
Abul-GheitAhmed (2020) Egypt Foreign Policy in Times of Crisis: My Testimony. Cairo: American University Press.
4.
AhmedHood (2018) Surviving the Arab Uprisings: Political Regimes and State Responses. Master’s Thesis, American University in Cairo, Egypt.
5.
AllisonGraham (1971) The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
6.
AllisonGrahamHalperinMorton (1972) Bureaucratic Politics: A paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics24: 40–79.
al-Mawqif al-Masry (2023) What Do We Know about al-Organi’s Empire: Authority and wealth. https://almawkefalmasry.com/
13.
al-Mawqif al-Masry (2024a) A Question to the Government: Ras al-Hikma is for sale or usufruct?https://almawkefalmasry.com/
14.
al-Mawqif al-Masry (2024b) The Closure of the Case of Civil Society Organizations after 13 Years of Investigations: Do we get anything?https://almawkefalmasry.com/
BaderJuliaFaustJörg (2014) Foreign Aid, Democratization, and Autocratic Survival. International Studies Review16(4): 575–595. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24758503
31.
Baha Eal-DinAhmed (1987) Interviews with al-Sadat. Cairo: Dar-ul-Hillal.
32.
BarnettMichael (1999) Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations5(1): 5–36.
33.
BatabyalAnindya (2002) Change and Continuity in Indonesian Foreign Policy: From Sukarno, Suharto to Megawati. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations6(1): 29–44.
34.
BellinEva (2004) The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics36(2): 139–157.
35.
CarboniAndreaRaleighClionadh (2021) Regime Cycles and Political Change in African Autocracies. The Journal of Modern African Studies59(4): 415–437.
DalmassoEmanuelaCavatortaFrancesco (2013) Democracy, Civil Liberties and the Role of Religion After the Arab Awakening: Constitutional reforms in Tunisia and Morocco. Mediterranean Politics18(2): 225–241.
38.
DarwichMayKaarboJuliette (2020) IR in the Middle East: Foreign policy analysis in theoretical approaches. International Relations34(2): 225–245.
39.
DessoukiAliYoussefAhmedKoranyBahgat (1984) The Foreign Policies of Arab States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
DestradiSandraCadierDavidPlagemannJohannes (2021) Populism and Foreign Policy: A research agenda. Comparative European Politics19(6): 663–682.
GhaliBotros (2005) In Waiting of the Full Moon. Cairo: Dar-ul-Shuruq.
50.
HaddadFouad (2017) ‘Sectarianism’ and its Discontents in the Study of the Middle East. The Middle East Journal71(3): 363–382.
51.
HallidayFred (2005) The Middle East in International Relations: Power, Politics and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
HeikalMohamed (1992) The Gulf War: Illusions of Power and Triumph. Cairo: Al-Ahram Center for Translation and Publishing.
53.
HermannMargaret (1970) Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly24: 7–46.
54.
HermannMargaretHermannCharles (1989) Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How: An empirical inquiry. International Studies Quarterly33(4): 361–387.
55.
HermannMargaretPrestonThomasKoranyBahgatShawTimothy (2001) Who Leads Matters: The effects of powerful individuals. International Studies Review3(2): 83–131.
56.
HinnebuschRaymond (2006) Authoritarian Persistence, Democratization Theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique. Democratization13(3): 373–395.
57.
HinnebuschRaymond (2008) Modern Syrian Politics. History Compass6: 263–285.
58.
HinnebuschRaymond (2018) Understanding Regime Divergence in the Post-Uprising Arab States. Journal of Historical Sociology31(1): 39–52.
59.
HinnebuschRaymondEhteshamiAnoushiravan (2014) The Foreign Policies of Middle East States. 2nd edn.Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publisher.
60.
HudsonValerie (2005) Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis1: 1–30.
61.
JanningJosefFrontiniAndrea (2013) Unfulfilled Promises: An assessment of the Arab Spring, its challenges and prospects. SIAK-Journal1: 4–18.
62.
KaarboJuliette (2015) A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory. International Studies Review17(2): 189–216.
63.
KaarboJulietteLantisJaniceBeasleyRyan (2002) The Analysis of Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective. In BeasleyRyan (ed.) Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective: Domestic and International Influences on State Behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 1–26.
64.
KingStephen (2003) Liberalization Against Democracy: The Local Politics of Economic Reform in Tunisia. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
65.
KoranyBahgat (1984) How Foreign Policy Decisions Are Made in Third World Countries. London: Routledge.
66.
KoranyBahgatDessoukiAli (eds) (1984) The Foreign Policies of Arab States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
67.
KoranyBahgatDessoukiAli (1991) The Foreign Policies of Arab States. The Challenge of Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
KoranyBahgatDessoukiAli (eds) (2008) The Foreign Policies of Arab States: The Challenge of Globalization. Cairo: Cairo University Press.
MaguedShaimaa (2018) The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s Transnational Advocacy in Turkey: A new means of political participation. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies45(3): 480–497.
76.
MaguedShaimaa (2022) The ‘Incomplete’ Failure of Political Islam: The Justice and Development Party and the Freedom and Justice Party as case studies. Politics42(4): 505–523.
77.
MaguedShaimaa (Forthcoming) Unpacking al-Sisi’s Threefold Populism Through Agamben’s State of Exception Following 3 July 2013. Middle East Law and Governance.
78.
MarshKevin (2014) Obama’s Surge: A bureaucratic politics analysis of the decision to order a troop surge in the Afghanistan war. Foreign Policy Analysis10(3): 265–288.
79.
MessariNizar (2020) Moroccan Foreign Policy under Mohammed VI: Balancing diversity and respect. Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/nqp2sd
80.
MerrittRichardZinnesDina (1991) On Measuring Democracy. London: Routledge.
RibeiroPedroBurianCamilo López (2023) Foreign Policy Specificity: An analysis of ministerial survival in Latin America, 1945–2020. Latin American Politics and Society65(4): 176–194.
89.
RipsmanNorrinTaliaferroJeffereyLobellSteven (2016) Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90.
RosatiJerel (2000) The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics. International Studies Review2(3): 45–75.
91.
ŞahinDevrim (2022) Turkey’s Foreign Policy in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Middle East Policy29: 67–84.
92.
SelimGamal (2020) Egyptian Foreign Policy After the 2011 Revolution: The dynamics of continuity and change. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies49(1): 1–22.
SIS.eg (2023) Egyptian Prime Minister: Syria’s return to the Arab League is an effective step toward unity and cooperation. Available at: https://sis.gov.eg/Story/257535D8
95.
SpringborgRobert (1989) Mubarak’s Egypt: Fragmentation of the Political Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
96.
SproutHaroldSproutMargaret (1957) Environment Factors in the Study of International Politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution1: 309–328.
97.
SteinEwan (2012) Beyond Arabism vs. Sovereignty: Relocating ideas of international relations of the Middle East. Review of International Studies38(4): 881–905.
98.
StoessingerJohn (1979) Crusaders and Pragmatists: Movers of Modern American Foreign Policy. New York, NY: WW Norton.
99.
TaşHakkı (2022) The Formulation and Implementation of Populist Foreign Policy: Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics27(5): 563–587.
100.
TelhamiShibley (1990) A Theory of Egypt’s Regional Policy: The case of Camp David. American Arab Affairs33: 99–114.
101.
TelhamiShibleyBarnettMichael (2002) Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
ValbjørnMorten (2017) Strategies for Reviving the International Relations/Middle East Nexus After the Arab Uprisings. PS: Political Science & Politics50(3): 647–651.
104.
WehnerLeslieThiesCameron (2021) Leader Influence in Role Selection Choices: Fulfilling role theory’s potential for foreign policy analysis. International Studies Review23(4): 1424–1441.
