The last decade has seen an expansion of party primaries as a means of selecting legislative candidates. Since primaries are rarely subsidized, well-resourced candidates have a considerable advantage, which has an impact on equality, diversity and representation. This article focuses on the well-regulated legislative primaries in Israel, examining the gender gap in campaign expenditures, and its implication for the success of women candidates. The analysis is based on data regarding 365 candidates (97 women and 268 men) who competed in seven primary contests in three parties between 2008 and 2015. Our findings show that male candidates spend on average more than female candidates do. However, this difference is pronounced among new candidates only. Moreover, we find that men do better than women in terms of electoral success and that this electoral advantage is explained by the differences in campaign expenses and the share of incumbents between women and men.
AnastasopoulosLefteris (2016) Estimating the Gender Penalty in House of Representative Elections Using a Regression Discontinuity Design. Electoral Studies43: 150–157.
2.
BarberMichaelButlerDaniel MPreeceJessica (2016) Gender Inequalities in Campaign Finance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science11(2): 219–248.
3.
BarnesTiffany DBrantonRegina PCasseseErin C (2017) A Reexamination of Women’s Electoral Success in Open Seat Elections: The Conditioning Effect of Electoral Competition. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy38(3): 298–317.
4.
BuckleyFionaMarianiMack (2022) Money Matters: The Impact of Gender Quotas on Campaign Spending for Women Candidates. International Political Science Review.
5.
BurrellBarbara C (1985) Women’s and Men’s Campaigns for the US House of Representatives, 1972-1982, a Finance Gap?American Politics Research13(3): 251–272.
6.
CarrollSusan JSanbonmatsuKira (2013) More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
CrespinMichael HDeitzJanna L (2010) If You Can’t Join ‘Em, Beat ‘Em: The gender gap in individual donations to Congressional candidates. Political Research Quarterly63(3): 581–593.
8.
CrossWilliam PBlaisAndré (2012) Politics at the Centre: The Selection and Removal of Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CrossWilliam PKenigOferPruysersScottRahatGideon (2016) The Promise and Challenge of Party Primary Elections: A Comparative Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
10.
DevroeRobinWautersBram (2018) Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent men versus leftist women?Political Research Quarterly71(4): 788–800.
11.
FeoFrancescaFiorelliChiaraPiccioDaniela R (2022) Gendered Patterns in Candidates’ Campaign Fundraising: The case of Italy. International Political Science Review.
12.
FoxRichard LLawlessJennifer L (2014) Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition. American Political Science Review108(3): 499–519.
13.
GamboaRicardoMoralesMauricio (2021) Candidate Gender Quotas and Campaign Spending in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems: The case of Chile. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy42(3): 260–271.
14.
HazanReuven YRahatGideon (2010) Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HinojosaMagda (2012) Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
HofnungMenachem (2006) Financing Internal Party Races in Non-Majoritarian Political Systems: Lessons from the Israeli experience. Election Law Journal5(4): 372–383.
17.
HoganRobert E (2007) The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections. Social Science Quarterly88(5): 1092–1105.
18.
Itzkovitch-MalkaReutFriedbergChen (2018) Gendering Security: The substantive representation of women in the Israeli parliament. European Journal of Women’s Studies25(4): 419–439.
19.
JacobsonGary C (1990) The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New evidence for old arguments. American Journal of Political Science34(2): 334–362.
20.
KenigOferAtmorNir (2021) Candidate Spending and Success in Israel’s Party Primaries: How far does money go?Party Politics27(1): 125–136.
21.
KitchensKarin ESwersMichele L (2016) Why Aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, partisanship, and fundraising support in the 2010 and 2012 elections. Politics & Gender12(4): 648–676.
22.
LawlessJennifer LFoxRichard L (2010) It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LawlessJennifer LPearsonKathryn (2008) The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Politics70(1): 67–82.
24.
MeserveStephen APemsteinDanielBernhardWilliam T (2018) Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations. British Journal of Political Science50(1): 1–15.
25.
MuriaasRagnhildWangVibekeMurrayRainbow (eds) (2020) Gendered Electoral Financing: Money, Power and Representation in Comparative Perspective. Oxon: Routledge.
26.
MurrayRainbow (2008) The Power of Sex and Incumbency: A longitudinal study of electoral performance in France. Party Politics14(5): 539–554.
27.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie MBarnesTiffany D (2020) Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
28.
PiletJean BenoitCrossWilliam P (eds) (2014) Leadership Selection in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.
29.
PiscopoJennifferHinojosaMagdaThomasGwynnSiavelisPeter M (2021) Follow the Money: Gender, incumbency, and campaign funding in Chile. Comparative Political Studies55(2): 222–253.
30.
RahatGideon (2009) Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic?Government and Opposition44(1): 68–90.
31.
SamuelsDavid (2001) Incumbents and Challengers on a Level Playing Field: Assessing the impact of campaign finance in Brazil. Journal of Politics63(2): 569–584.
32.
SandriGiuliaSeddoneAntonella (2015) Introduction: Primary elections around the world. In SandriGiuliaSeddoneAntonellaVenturinoFulvio (eds) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. London: Ashgate, 1–20.
33.
ScarrowSusan E (2007) Political Finance in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science10(1): 193–210.
34.
ScarrowSusan E (2018) Political Finance Regulation and Equality: Comparing strategies and impact. In JonathanMendilowPhélippeauEric (eds) Handbook of Political Party Funding. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 103–124.
35.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A (2005) The Incumbency Disadvantage and Women’s Election to Legislative Office. Electoral Studies24(2): 227–244.
36.
ShapiraAssafKenigOferFriedbergChenItzkovitch-MalkaReut (2016) The Representation of Women in Israeli Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Jerusalem, Israel: The Israel Democracy Institute.
37.
SmuldersJefPutGert-JanMaddensBart (2019) How Legislative Gender Quotas Affect the Gender Gap in Campaign Spending: An analysis of the federal and regional elections in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties29(1): 41–60.
38.
SpeckBruno WMancuso PWagner (2014) A Study on the Impact of Campaign Finance, Political Capital and Gender on Electoral Performance. Brazilian Political Science Review8(1): 34–57.
39.
TempletonGary F (2011) A Two-Step Approach for Transforming Continuous Variables to Normal: Implications and recommendations for IS researchCommunications of the Association for Information Systems28(4): 41–58.
40.
ThomsenDanielle MSwersMichele L (2017) Which Women can Run? Gender, partisanship, and candidate donor networks. Political Research Quarterly70(2): 449–463.
41.
UhlanerCarole JeanSchlozmanKay Lehman (1986) Candidate Gender and Congressional Campaign Receipts. The Journal of Politics48(1): 30–50.
42.
Van BiezenIngrid (2008) State Intervention in Party Politics: The public funding and regulation of political partiesEuropean Review16(3): 337–353.
43.
WautersBramWeekersKarolienMaddensBart (2010) Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-List PR System: An investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium). Acta Politica45(4): 468–490.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
