How do political parties in low- and high-cost institutional contexts respond to funding inequalities as a source of gender imbalance for those seeking elected office? We rely on a ‘most similar’ logic to answer this question and develop two categories of cost intensity comprised of three institutions – electoral system, candidate selection model and public funding. Our findings show that parties in both contexts see funding as a source of inequality, but that the obstacles women face are more salient to parties in a high-cost (Ghana) than a low-cost (Cabo Verde) context. Only in Ghana have parties adopted funding measures that directly target women.
AmesBarry (1995) Electoral Strategy Under Open-List Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science39(2): 406–433.
2.
AnckarCarsten (2008) On the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology11(5): 389–401.
3.
AtmorNirKenigOfer (Forthcoming) Campaign Expenditures and Electoral Outcomes in the Israeli Legislative Primaries – a Financial Gender Gap?International Political Science Review.
BauerGretchenDarkwahAkosua (2020) ‘Some Money Has to be Going’: Discounted filing fees to bring more women into parliament in Ghana. In MuriaasRagnhildWangVibekeMurrayRainbow (eds) Gendered Electoral Financing: Money, Power and Representation in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge, 133–153.
6.
BauerGretchenDarkwahAkosua (2021) Party Primaries and Women’s Representation in Ghana: How can more women aspirants win? In ArriolaLeonardoJohnsonMarthaPhillipsMelanie (eds) Women and Power in Africa: Aspiring, Campaigning, and Governing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–84.
7.
BjarnegårdElin (2013) Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BjarnegårdElinZetterbergPär (2019) Political Parties, Formal Selection Criteria, and Gendered Parliamentary Representation. Party Politics25(3): 325–335.
9.
BorgesAleidaMuriaasRagnhildWangVibeke (2020) Cabo Verde: Legislated candidates quotas with reward for compliance in Cabo Verde: Victory for no one? In MuriaasRagnhild LWangVibekeMurrayRainbow (eds) Gendered Electoral Financing: Money, Power and Representation in Comparative Politics. New York, NY: Routledge, 74–92.
10.
BuckleyFionaMarianiMack (Forthcoming) Money Matters: The impact of gender quotas on campaign spending for women candidates. International Political Science Review.
11.
CareyJohn MShugartMatthew S (1995) Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
12.
CaulMiki (1999) Women’s Representation in Parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics5(1): 79–98.
13.
ChildsSarahKittilsonMiki C (2016) Feminizing Political Parties: Women’s party member organizations within European parliamentary parties. Party Politics22(5): 598–608.
14.
CurryJamesHerrnsonPaul STaylorJeffrey A (2013) The Impact of District Magnitude on Campaign Fundraising. Legislative Studies Quarterly38(4): 517–543.
15.
FeoFrancescaFiorelliChiariPiccioDaniela (Forthcoming) Gendered Patterns in Candidates’ Campaign Fundraising: The case of Italy. International Political Science Review.
16.
FeoFrancescaPiccioDaniela (2020) Promoting Gender Equality Through Party Funding: Symbolic policies at work in Italy. Politics & Gender16(3): 903–929.
17.
HinojosaMagda (2012) Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18.
IchinoNahomiNathanNoah (2021) Democratizing the Party: The Effects of Primary Election Reforms in Ghana. British Journal of Political Science, 1–18.
JohnsonMartha C (2020) Training Women to Run in an African Democracy: The case of Benin. In ShamesShauna LBernhardRachel IHolmanMirya RTeeleDawn Langan (eds) Good Reasons to Run: Women and Political Candidacy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 258–272.
21.
KayuniHappyMuriaasRagnhild L (2014) Alternatives to Gender Quotas: Electoral financing of women candidates in Malawi. Representation50(3): 393–404.
22.
KennyMerylVergeTànja (2016) Opening Up the Black Box: Gender and candidate selection in a new era. Government and Opposition51(3): 351–369.
23.
KreitzerRebeccaOsbornTracy L (2019) The Emergence and Activities of Women’s Recruiting Groups in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities7(4): 842–852.
24.
KrookMona LNorrisPippa (2014) Beyond Quotas: Strategies to promote gender equality in elected office. Political Studies62(1): 2–20.
25.
LawlessJennifer LPearsonKathryn (2008) The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Politics70(1): 67–82.
26.
MaNgokChoyChi-keung (2003) The Impact of Electoral Rule Change on Party Campaign Strategy. Party Politics9(3): 347–367.
27.
MatlandRichard (2003) Women’s Representation in Post-Communist Europe. In MatlandRichardMontgomeryKathleen (eds) Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321–341.
MozaffarShaheenScarrittJames RGalaichGlen (2003) Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages and party systems in Africa’s emerging democracies. American Political Science Review97: 379–390.
30.
MuriaasRagnhildMazurAmyHoardSeason (2021) Payments and Penalties for Democracy: Gendered electoral financing in action worldwide. American Political Science Review, 1–14.
31.
MuriaasRagnhild LWangVibekeMurrayRainbow (2020) Introduction. In MuriaasRagnhildWangVibekeMurrayRainbow (eds) Gendered Electoral Financing: Money, Power and Representation in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–24.
32.
MurrayRainbow (2014) Quotas for Men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review108(3): 520–532.
33.
NorrisPippa (1997) Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems. International Political Science Review18(3): 297–312.
34.
OhmanMagnus (2018) Gender-Target Public Funding for Political Parties: A Comparative Analysis. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
35.
PiscopoJennifer MHinojosaMagdaThomasGwynnSiavelisPeter M (2021) Follow the Money: Gender, incumbency, and campaign funding in Chile. Comparative Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 1 July 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00104140211024300.
36.
PitcherAnneMoranMary HJohnstonMichael (2009) Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism in Africa. African Studies Review52(1): 125–156.
37.
PonceAldoScarrowSusanAchurySusan (2020) Quotas, Women’s Leadership and Grassroots Women Activists: Bringing women into the party?European Journal of Political Research59(4): 867–885.
38.
SamuelsDavid (2001) Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society43(2): 27–48.
39.
ShomerYael (2009) Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 945–970.
40.
ShinKi-youngKwonSoo Hyon (Forthcoming) ‘It’s Money That Matters in the End’: The impact of gender-targeted public financing on political parties and women candidates in South Korea. International Political Science Review.
41.
SvåsandLars (2014) Regulation of Political Parties and Party Functions in Malawi: Incentive structures and the selective application of the rules. International Political Science Review35(3): 275–290.
42.
van BiezenIngridKopeckýPetr (2007) The State and the Parties. Party Politics13(2): 235–254.
43.
van CranenburghOda (2008) ‘Big Men’ Rule: Presidential power, regime type and democracy in 30 African countries. Democratization15(5): 952–973.
44.
WarburtonEveMuhtadiBurhanuddinAspinallEdwardFossatiDiego (2021) When Does Class Matter? Unequal representation in Indonesian legislatures. Third World Quarterly42(6): 1252–1275.
YoonJisoShinKi-young (2015) Mixed Effects of Legislative Quotas in South Korea. Politics & Gender11(1): 186–195.
47.
ZittelThomasGschwendThomas (2008) Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German elections. West European Politics31(5): 978–1003.
