In this study we conduct a least-likely case study in order to assess the analytical power of the ideational approach to populism. We do so by testing the direct and conditional effects of populist attitudes on vote choices in Argentina. We examine whether populist attitudes are associated with the Peronist vote, as more essentialist interpretations would lead us to expect, or, on the contrary, linked to vote for right parties, an expectation that is more consistent with thin-ideological approaches. Our data consists of an original online survey carried out in September 2020, a specific juncture at which the Peronist government had to deal with widespread popular discontent caused by intense economic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings reveal that populist attitudes are positively associated with voting for right parties and that the effects of such attitudes are conditioned by ideological preferences. These results underscore the explanatory power of ideational approaches to the electoral activation of populist attitudes.
Aboy CarlésGerardo (2013) El Radicalismo Yrigoyenista y el Proceso de Nacionalización del Espacio Político. Una Interpretación a través de los Usos del Concepto de Hegemonía. Identidades4: 33–47.
2.
Aboy CarlésGerardoBarrosSebastiánMeloJulián (2013) Las Brechas del Pueblo. Reflexiones sobre Identidades Populares y Populismo. Buenos Aires: UNGS-UNDAV.
3.
AkkermanAgnesMuddeCasZasloveAndrej (2014) How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies47(9): 1324–1353.
4.
AlessandroMartín (2009) Clivajes Sociales, Estrategias de los Actores y Sistema de Partidos: la Competencia Política en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires (1995–2005). SAAP. Publicación de Ciencia Política de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político3(3): 581–614.
5.
AndreadisIoannisHawkinsKirk ALlamazaresIvánSingerMatthew M (2018) Conditional Populist Voting in Chile, Greece, Spain, and Bolivia. In HawkinsKACarlinRELittvayLKaltwasserCR (eds) The Ideational Approach to Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 238–278.
6.
AslanidisParis (2016) Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective. Political Studies64(1): 88–104.
7.
BonikowskiBartGidronNoam (2016a) Multiple Traditions in Populism Research: Toward a theoretical synthesis. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter26(12): 7–14.
8.
BonikowskiBartGidronNoam (2016b) The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces94(4): 1593–1621.
9.
BonvecchiAlejandroNovaroMarcos (2021) ¿Hay Aquí una Paradoja? Recurrencia y Funcionalidad del Populismo en Argentina. Desarrollo Económico. Revista De Ciencias Sociales60(231): 228–239.
10.
BornschierSimon (2018) Populist Success in Latin America and Western Europe: Ideational and party-system-centered explanations. In HawkinsKACarlinRELittvayLRovira KaltwasserC (eds) The Ideational Approach to Populism. Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge, 202–237.
11.
CalvoErnestoMurilloMaría Victoria (2013) When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies46(7): 851–882.
12.
CartyEmilyTorcalMariano (2020) ‘Warming Up’ to Populism: The mechanisms behind support for populist leaders. In: Presented to the 116th American Political Science Association Annual Conference, September 30 – October 3. San Francisco.
13.
Castanho SilvaBrunoJungkunzSebastianHelblingMarkLittvayLevente (2020) An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly73(2): 409–424.
14.
CasulloMaría Esperanza (2019) ¿Por qué Funciona el Populismo?: El Discurso que Sabe Construir Explicaciones Convincentes de un Mundo en Crisis. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
15.
CollierRuth BerinsCollierDavid (1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Di TellaTorcuato S (1965) Populismo y Reforma en América Latina. Desarrollo Económico4: 391–425.
17.
GerchunoffPabloRapettiMartínde LeónGonzalo (2020) La Paradoja Populista. Desarrollo Económico. Revista De Ciencias Sociales59(229): 299–328.
18.
GermaniGino (1973) El Surgimiento del Peronismo: El Rol de los Obreros y de los Migrantes Internos. Desarrollo Económico13(51): 435.
19.
GerringJohn (2007) Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?Comparative Political Studies40(3): 231–253.
20.
GoyburuLara (2020) El Caso Argentino: un Virus sobre la Grieta. En Martí PuigSAAlcántara SáezM (eds) Política y Crisis en América Latina. Reacción e Impacto frente a la Covid-19. Madrid, Spain: Marcial Pons, 25–42.
21.
GrigeraJuan (2017) Populism in Latin America: Old and new populisms in Argentina and Brazil. International Political Science Review38(4): 441–455.
22.
HawkinsKirk ACarlinRyan ELittvayLeventeKaltwasser RCristobal (2018) The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
JenneErik KHawkinsKirk ASilvaBruno Castanho (2021) Mapping Populism and Nationalism in Leader Rhetoric Across North America and Europe. Studies in Comparative International Development56(2): 170–196.
24.
JungkunzSebastianFaheyRobert AHinoAiro (2021) Populists Vote for Populists, Right? How Populist Attitude Scales Fail to Capture Support for Populists in Power. SocArXiv, March29.
25.
KamCindy DFranzeseRobert J (2009) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26.
LevitskySteven (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Argentina in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LevyJack S (2002) Qualitative Methods in International Relations. In HarveyFPBrecherM (eds) Evaluating Methodology in International Studies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 432–454.
28.
LunaJuan Pablo (2014) Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MacriMauricio (2020) Para Defender el Presente y Ganar el Futuro. La Nación, 22September.
30.
Marcos-MarneHugo (2020) A Tale of Populism? The Determinants of Voting for Left-Wing Populist Parties in Spain. Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 2 September 2020. DOI:10.1177/0032321720950215.
31.
MuddeCas (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 542–563.
32.
MuñozMaría AntoniaRetamozoMartín (2008) Hegemonía y Discurso en la Argentina Contemporánea: Efectos Políticos de los Usos del ‘Pueblo’ en la Retórica de Néstor Kirchner. Perfiles Latinoamericanos16(31): 121–149.
33.
OstiguyPierre (1997) Peronismo y Antiperonismo: Bases socioculturales de la Identidad Política en la Argentina. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 6: 133–215.
34.
OstiguyPierre (2009) The High and the Low in Politics: A Two-Dimensional Political Space for Comparative Analysis and Electoral Studies. Working Paper Nº 360, July. Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
35.
PalermoVicenteNovaroMarcos (1996) Política y Poder en el Gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Norma.
36.
PalermoVicenteTorreJuan Carlos (1992) A la Sombra de la Hiperinflación. La Política de Reformas Estructurales en Argentina. Santiago, Chile: Cepal.
37.
PortantieroJuan Carlos (1977) Economía y Política en la Crisis Argentina: 1958–1973. Revista Mexicana de Sociología39(2): 531–565.
38.
PortantieroJuan CarlosDe IpolaEmilio (1981) Lo Nacional Popular y los Populismos Realmente Existentes. Nueva Sociedad54: 7–18.
39.
RetamozoMartín (2017) La Teoría Política del Populismo: Usos y Controversias en América Latina en la Perspectiva Posfundacional. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos64: 125–151.
40.
RodríguezDarío A (2014) Populismo y Liderazgo en la Democracia Argentina: Un Cruce Comparativo entre el Menemismo y el Kirchnerismo. Revista POSTData: Revista de Reflexión y Análisis Político19(2): 637–380.
41.
RohlfingIngo (2012) Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
SchimmelfennigFrank (2014) Efficient Process Tracing. In BennettACheckelJ (eds) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Strategies for Social Inquiry). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 98–125.
43.
SchulzAnneMüllerPhilippSchemerChristianWirzDominique SWettsteinMartinWirthWerner (2018) Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(2): 316–326.
44.
SendraMariana (2021) The dimensional nature of voting in the 2015 Argentine elections. Revista Estudios Sociológicos 118.
45.
Van HauwaertSteve MSchimpfChristian HAzevedoFlavio (2020) The Measurement of Populist Attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Politics40(1): 3–21.
46.
WiesehomeierNinaSingerMatthewRuth-LovellSaskia (2021) Political Representation, Executives, and Political Parties Survey: Data from expert surveys in 18 Latin American Countries, 2018–2019. IE University, University of Connecticut and GIGA Institute Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JLOYIJ
47.
WuttkeAlexanderSchimpfChristianSchoenHarald (2020) When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review114(2): 356–374.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
