South Korea is the seventh largest emitter of CO2 and its climate-change mitigation policies are clearly insufficient. At the same time, the country has been very ambitious in implementing industrial policies promoting green technologies and international initiatives to support greenhouse gas mitigation in developing countries. What explains this discrepancy between weak emission goals and strong investments in green technology as well as ambitions to become a green ‘global leader’? This article argues that the specific character of Korean climate policies can be understood in the context of Korea’s legacy as a developmental state characterized by strong corporatist links between state and business as well as a weak civil society.
EvansPeter (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and industrial transformation.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
9.
FioriAntonio and Sunhyuk Kim (2011)
The Dynamics of Welfare Policy-Making in South Korea: Social movements as policy entrepreneurs. Asian Social Work and Policy Review5: 61–78.
10.
Framework Act on Low Carbon and Green Growth (2010) Act No. 9931. 13 Jan, 2010. Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/.
HallPeter A and David W Soskice (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
HanHeejin (2015)
Authoritarian Environmentalism Under Democracy: Korea’s river restoration project. Environmental Politics24: 810–829.
17.
HanckéBob (2009) Debating Varieties of Capitalism: A reader.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
18.
JohnsonChalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
19.
JonesRandall S and Byungseo Yoo (2011)
Korea’s Green Growth Strategy: Mitigating climate change and developing a new growth engine.OECD Economics Department Working Papers798.
20.
KalinowskiThomas (2008)
State-Civil Society Synergy and Cooptation: The case of the minority shareholder movement in Korea. Korea Observer39(3): 339–367.
21.
KalinowskiThomas (2015)
Crisis Management and the Diversity of Capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the East Asian (neo-)developmental state. Economy and Society44(2): 244–270.
22.
KalinowskiThomas and Min Joung Park (2016)
South Korean Development Cooperation in Africa: The legacy of a developmental state. Africa Spectrum51(3): 61–75.
23.
KernThomas (2010)
Translating Global Values into National Contexts: The rise of environmentalism in South Korea. International Sociology25: 869–896.
24.
KimSung-Young (2019)
Hybridized Industrial Ecosystems and the Makings of a New Developmental Infrastructure in East Asia’s Green Energy Sector. Review of International Political Economy26(1): 158–182.
25.
KimSung-Young and Elizabeth Thurbon (2015)
Developmental Environmentalism Explaining South Korea’s Ambitious Pursuit of Green Growth. Politics & Society43: 213–240.
26.
KimSunhyuk (2012) ‘
Contentious Democracy’ in South Korea: An active civil society and ineffectual political parties. Taiwan Journal of Democracy8: 51–61.
27.
KimSunhyuk and Jong-Ho Jeong (2017)
Historical Development of Civil Society in Korea Since 1987. Journal of International and Area Studies24: 1–14.
NiederhafnerStefan (2014)
The Korean Energy and GHG Target Management System: An Alternative to Kyoto-Protocol Emissions Trading Systems?TEMEP Discussion Papers2014: 118.
PetersB Guy, Andrew Jordan and Jale Tosun (2017)
Over-reaction and Under-reaction in Climate Policy: An institutional analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning19: 612–624.
36.
RodrikDani (2014)
Green Industrial Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy30: 469–491.
37.
Sonnenschein, Jonas and Luis Mundaca (2016) Decarbonization under Green Growth Strategies? The Case of South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 180–193.
38.
StorzCornelia, Bruno Amable, Steven Casper and Sebastien Lechevalier (2013)
Bringing Asia into the Comparative Capitalism Perspective. Socio-Economic Review11: 217–232.
39.
ThelenKathleen (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany,
Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
40.
ThurbonElizabeth (2016) Developmental Mindset: The revival of financial activism in South Korea Ithaca,
NY:
Cornell University Press.
41.
TosunJale (2018)
The Behaviour of Suppliers and Consumers in Mandated Markets: The introduction of the ethanol–petrol blend E10 in Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning20: 1–15.
42.
TosunJale and Adrian Rinscheid (2019) Joining the Clean Energy Ministerial: An integrated analysis of the domestic and international factors. Unpublished manuscript.
ValentineScott Victor And Benjamin K Sovacool (2010)
The Socio-Political Economy of Nuclear Power Development in Japan and South Korea. Energy Policy38: 7971–7979.
45.
WalterAndrew, and Xiaoke Zhang (2012) East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
46.
WeissLinda (1995)
Governed Interdependence: Rethinking the government‐business relationship in East Asia. The Pacific Review8: 589–616.
47.
Woo-CumingsMeredith (ed.). (1999) The Developmental State.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
YunKyungjun and Esook Yoon (2016)
The International Climate Change Regime and Evolution of South Korea’s Climate Change Policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration24 (1): 71–107.
50.
YunSun-Jin, Dowan Ku and Jin-Yi Han (2014)
Climate Policy Networks in South Korea: Alliances and conflicts. Climate Policy14: 283–301.
51.
ZhangXiaoke and Richard Whitley (2013)
Changing Macro-structural Varieties of East Asian Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review11: 301–336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
