The media can play an important role in the relationship between citizens and their government by acting as a watchdog and providing timely information about malfeasance and corruption. We examine whether citizens’ perceptions of government corruption are closer to country experts’ assessments in countries where there are higher levels of press freedom. Using data on citizens’ perceptions of government corruption and country expert evaluations of levels of political corruption for over 100 countries, we present evidence that the relationship between expert measures of corruption and citizens’ perceptions is heightened as the level of press freedom increases across our sample. These findings suggest that a free press can play an important role in bringing corruption to light, educating citizens, and potentially allowing them to better hold their elected officials accountable.
AlesinaAlbertoDevleeschauwerArnaudEasterlyWilliamKurlatSergioWacziargRomain (2003) Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 155–194.
2.
AnderssonStaffanHeywoodPaul M (2009) The Politics of Perception: Use and abuse of Transparency International’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies57(4): 746–767.
3.
AnduizaEvaGallegoAinaMuñozJordi (2013) Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes towards corruption. Comparative Political Studies46(12): 1664–1692.
4.
AßländerMichael S (Forthcoming) How to Overcome Structural Injustice? Social connectedness and the tenet of subsidiarity. Journal of Business Ethics OnlineFirst 1–14. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-018-3985-0
5.
AtkinsonMichael MBierlingGerald (2005) Politicians, the Public, and Political Ethics: Worlds apart. Canadian Journal of Political Science38(4): 1003–1028.
6.
AvkiranNecmi KKanolDirençOliverBarrySmithTom (2016) Knowledge of Campaign Finance Regulation Reduces Perceptions of Corruption. Accounting & Finance56(4): 961–984.
7.
BeckerSascha OBoeckhKatrinHeinzChristaWoessmanLudger (2016) The Empire is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-run persistence of trust and corruption in the bureaucracy. Economic Journal126(590): 40–74.
8.
BowlerShaunDonovanTodd (2016) Campaign Money, Congress, and Perceptions of Corruption. American Politics Research44(2): 272–295.
9.
BrunettiAymoWederBeatrice (2003) A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics87(7): 1801–1824.
10.
CamajLindita (2013) The Media’s Role in Fighting Corruption: Media effects on governmental accountability. The International Journal of Press/Politics18(1): 21–42.
11.
ChaffeeSteven HKanihanStacey Frank (1997) Learning about Politics from the Mass Media. Political Communication14(4): 421–430.
12.
CharronNicholas (2016) Do Corruption Measures have a Perception Problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts. European Political Science Review8(1): 147–171.
13.
CofféHilde (2017) Citizens’ media use and the accuracy of their perceptions of electoral integrity. International Political Science Review38(3): 281–297.
14.
CurranJamesIyengarShantoLundAnker BrinkSalovaara-MoringInka (2012) Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication24(1): 5–26.
15.
DavisCharles LAl CampRodericColemanKenneth M (2004) The Influence of Party Systems on Citizens’ Perceptions of Corruption and Electoral Response in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies37(6): 677–703.
16.
della PortaDonatella (2000) Social Capital, Beliefs in Government, and Political Corruption. In PharrSusan JPutnamRobert D (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 202–228.
17.
DonchevDilyanUjhelyiGergely (2014) What Do Corruption Indices Measure?Economics & Politics26(2): 309–331.
18.
EscresaLaarniLucioPicci (2017) A New Cross-National Measure of Corruption. World Bank Economic Review31(1): 196–219.
19.
EriksonRobert SWrightGerald CMcIverJohn P (1993) Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FreilleSebastianHaqueM EmranulKnellerRichard (2007) A Contribution to the Empirics of Press Freedom and Corruption. European Journal of Political Economy23(4): 838–862.
22.
FritzenScott ASerritzlewSørenSvendsenGert Tinggaard (2014) Corruption, Trust, and their Public Sector Consequences: Introduction to the special edition. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis16(2): 117–120.
23.
GraberDoris (1988) Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman.
24.
HeywoodPaul MRoseJonathan (2014) ‘Close but No Cigar’: The measurement of corruption. Journal of Public Policy34(3): 507–529.
KenskiKateStroudNatalie Jomini (2006) Connections between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(2): 173–192.
27.
LedermanDanielLoayzaNorman VSoaresRodrigo R (2005) Accountability and Corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics & Politics17(1): 1–35.
28.
LeesonPeter T (2008) Media Freedom, Political Knowledge, and Participation. Journal of Economic Perspectives22(2): 155–169.
29.
MillerWilliam LGrødelandÅse BKoshechkinaTatyana Y. (2000) A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
30.
NisbetErik C (2008) Media Use, Democratic Citizenship, and Communication Gaps in a Developing Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research20(4): 454–482.
31.
NorrisPippa (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
OlkenBenjamin A (2009) Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality. Journal of Public Economics93(7): 950–964.
33.
PerssonTorstenTabelliniGuidoTrebbiFrancesco (2003) Electoral Rules and Corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association1(4): 958–989.
34.
RazafindrakotoMireilleRoubaudFrançois (2010) Are International Databases on Corruption Reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development38(8): 1057–1069.
35.
RedlawskDavid PMcCannJames A (2005) Popular Interpretations of ‘Corruption’ and their Partisan Consequences. Political Behavior27(3): 261–284.
36.
SchoonveldeMartijn (2014) Media Freedom and the Institutional Underpinnings of Political Knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods2(2): 163–178.
37.
SharafutdinovaGulnaz (2010) What Explains Corruption Perceptions? The dark side of political competition in Russia’s regions. Comparative Politics42(2): 147–166.
38.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoKhomenkoAnnaSvenssonRichard (2017) The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan17. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://www.qog.pol.gu.se. doi:10.18157/QoGStdJan17.
39.
WintersMatthew SWeitz-ShapiroRebecca (2013) Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption: When do voters support corrupt politicians?Comparative Politics45(4): 418–436.
40.
XenosMichaelMoyPatricia (2007) Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement. Journal of Communication57(4): 704–718.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
