What factors shape citizens’ willingness to engage in vote selling? This paper argues that providing voters with information about the detrimental effect of vote selling (public service predation) or telling them that their community members will look down on them if they engage in the practice (social sanctioning) can shape vote-selling attitudes in emerging democracies. Using a nationwide randomized survey experiment carried out between May and June of 2012 in Kenya, this study primes voters with theory-based informational messages for voters to test whether such messages can potentially curtail vote-selling attitudes. The paper finds that both public service predation and social sanctioning messages can reduce stated vote-selling preferences as much as legal campaigns that have been tested previously. The study has important implications for researchers and policy-makers because it suggests alternative methods to change vote-selling attitudes and even behavior in the short- to medium-term.
AidtToke SJensenPeter S (2017) From Open to Secret Ballot: Vote buying and modernization. Comparative Political Studies50(5): 555–593.
2.
AuyeroJavier (1999) “From the Client’s Point(s) of View”: How poor people perceive and evaluate political clientelism. Theory and Society28(2): 297–334.
3.
BalandJean-MarieRobinsonJames A (2008) Land and Power: Theory and evidence from Chile. The American Economic Review98(5): 1737–1765.
BeckLinda J (2003) Democratization and the Hidden Public: The impact of patronage networks on Senegalese women. Comparative Politics35(2): 147–169.
6.
BrattonMichael (2008) Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Electoral Studies27(4): 621–632.
7.
BrattonMichaelChangEric C C (2006) State building and democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa forwards, backwards, or together?Comparative Political Studies39(9): 1059–1083.
8.
CorstangeDaniel (2012) Vote trafficking in Lebanon. International Journal of Middle East Studies44(3): 483–505.
9.
DerconStefanGutiérrez-RomeroRoxana (2012) Triggers and characteristics of the 2007 Kenyan electoral violence. World Development40(4): 731–744.
10.
DietzTFoekenD (2000) Of Ethnicity, Manipulation, and Observation: The 1992 and 1997 elections in Kenya. In AbbinkJonHesselingGerti (eds) Election Observation and Democratization in Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 122–149.
11.
FaughnanBrian MZechmeisterElizabeth M (2011) Vote buying in the Americas. Americas Barometer Insights, No. 57. Report, Vanderbuilt University, Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), USA.
12.
FerreeKaren ELongJames D (2016) Gifts, threats, and perceptions of ballot secrecy in African elections. African Affairs115(461): 621–645.
13.
GeddesBarbara (1994) Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Gonzalez-OcantosEzequielde JongeChad KiewietMeléndezCarlosOsorioJavierNickersonDavid W (2012) Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science56(1): 202–217.
15.
González OcantosEzequielJongeChad KiewietNickersonDavid W (2014) The Conditionality of Vote-Buying Norms: Experimental evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science58(1): 197–211.
16.
HenrichJosephBoydRobertBowlesSamuelCamererColinFehrErnstGintisHerbertMcElreathRichard (eds) (2004) Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
HickenAllen D (2007) How Effective are Institutional Reforms? In SchafferFrederic Charles (ed.) Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 145–160.
18.
HickenAllenLeiderStephenRavanillaNicoYangDean (2018) Temptation in Vote-Selling: Evidence from a field experiment in the Philippines. Journal of Development Economics131: 1–14.
19.
HilgersTina (2009) ‘Who is Using Whom?’ Clientelism from the client’s perspective. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research15(1): 51–75.
20.
HirschmanAlbert O (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty; Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
21.
JensenPeter SandholtJustesenMogens K (2014) Poverty and Vote Buying: Survey-based evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies33: 220–232.
22.
JungDanielleLongJames, Social Sanctioning, Trust, and Voter Turnout in Emerging Democracies (May29, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3186835.
23.
KamChristopher (2017) The secret ballot and the market for votes at 19th-century British elections. Comparative Political Studies50(5): 594–635.
24.
KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I (2007) Citizen-Politician Linkages: An introduction. In KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I (eds) Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–49.
25.
MaresIsabela (2015) From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MiguelEdwardGugertyMary Kay (2005) Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics89(11–12): 2325–2368.
27.
NdegwaStephen N (2003) Kenya: Third time lucky?Journal of Democracy14(3): 145–158.
28.
NichterSimeon (2008) Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review102: 19–31.
29.
ParkHee SunKleinKatherine ASmithSandiMartellDennis (2009) Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions. Health Communication24(8): 746–751.
30.
RayJohn J (1990) Acquiescence and problems with forced-choice scales. Journal of Social Psychology130(3): 397–399.
31.
SchafferFrederic Charles (2008) The Hidden Costs of Clean Election Reform. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
SchafferFrederic CharlesSchedlerAndreas (2007) What Is Vote Buying? In SchafferFrederic Charles (ed.) Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 17–32.
SmythJolene DDillmanDon AChristianLeah MelaniSternMichael J (2006) Comparing check-all and forced-choice question formats in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly70(1): 66–77.
35.
StokesSusan CDunningThadNazarenoMarceloBruscoValeria (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
StuberJenniferGaleaSandroLinkBruce G (2008) Smoking and the emergence of a stigmatized social status. Social Science & Medicine67(3): 420–430.
37.
ThroupDavidHornsbyCharles (1998) Multi-Party Politics in Kenya: The Kenyatta & Moi States & the Triumph of the System in the 1992 Election. Athens: Ohio University Press.
38.
VicentePedro C (2014) Is Vote Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa. The Economic Journal124(574): F356–F387.
39.
WantchekonLeonard (2003) Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics55(3): 399–422.
40.
Weitz-ShapiroRebecca (2014) Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
WitteKim (1992) Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The extended parallel process Model. Communication Monographs59(4): 329–349.
42.
YzerMarco ASouthwellBrian GStephensonMichael T (2013) Inducing Fear as a Public Communication Strategy. In RiceRonald EAtkinCharles K (eds) Public Communication Campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 163–176.
43.
ZiblattDaniel (2009) Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The case of nineteenth-century Germany. American Political Science Review103(1): 1–21.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
