The unitary–federal dichotomy is used as a standard means for taxonomizing state forms. However, its classificatory power has been increasingly stretched by heterodox cases such as Spain, Italy, South Africa and, most recently, Bolivia. This article contends that Bolivia’s constitutional changes have definitively challenged the long-standing assumption that the unitary–federal divide best serves the goal of an accurate taxonomization in the field of comparative federalism. Despite the noise Bolivia’s latest constitutional reform has caused in the otherwise settled framework of comparative federalism’s most basic concepts, scholarship is opting for the most comfortable choice by squeezing Bolivia into the unitary compartment. Subsequent to the screening of different types of taxonomic approaches, a new classificatory framework for state forms, based on a dichotomy that combines legal theory and the methodological tools of political science, is proposed and tested on the Bolivian case.
AhmadEhtishamBrosioGiorgio (2006) Introduction: Fiscal federalism - A review of developments in the literature and policy. In AhmadEhtishamBrosioGiorgio (eds) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–32.
2.
AroneyNicholasKincaidJohn (2017) Introduction: Courts in federal countries. In NicholasAJohnK (eds) Courts in Federal Countries: Federalists or Unitarists?Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 3–28.
3.
ArretcheMarta (2015) Intergovernmental Relations in Brazil: An unequal federation with symmetrical arrangements. In JohannePCherylSJohnK (eds) Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems: Comparative structures and dynamics. Ontario: Oxford University Press, 108–134.
4.
BadíaJuan Fernando (1986) El estado unitario, el federal y el estado autonómico. Madrid: Tecnos.
5.
BarjaGoverVillarroelSergioZavaletaDavid (2012) Diseño institucional e incentivos implícitos en la descentralización Boliviana. La Paz: Plural Editores.
6.
Barrios-SuvelzaFranz Xavier (2002) El estado triterritorial – una nueva descentralización para Bolivia. La Paz: ILDIS, Plural.
7.
BeaudOlivier (2012) Conceptions of the State. In MichelRAndrásS (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–282.
8.
BednarJenna (2009) The Robust Federation: Principles of design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BobbioLuigiPipernoStefan (2010) Italy. In MichaelGEdwardP (eds) Changing Government Relations in Europe: From localism to intergovernmentalism. London: Routledge, 127–144.
10.
BrancoPaulo (2009) Organização do Estado. In GilmarMInocêncioCPauloB (eds) Curso de direito constitucional. São Paulo: Saraiva, 847–884.
11.
BurgessMichael (2012) In Search of the Federal Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CollierDavidAdcockRobert (1999) Democracy and Dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts. Annual Review of Political Science2: 537–565.
13.
CollierDavidLevitskySteven (2009) Conceptual Hierarchies in Comparative Research: The case of democracy. In DavidCJohnG (eds) Concepts and Methods in the Social Science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 269–288.
14.
CoppedgeMichael (2012) Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CurrieIainDe WaalJohan (2001) The New Constitutional & Administrative Law. Cape Town: Juta Law.
16.
EatonKent (2007) Backlash in Bolivia: Regional autonomy as a reaction against indigenous mobilization. Politics & Society35(1): 71–102.
17.
EatonKent (2012) Decentralization and Federalism. In PeterKDeborahY (eds) Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics. London: Routledge, 33–47.
18.
FaguetJean-Paul (2014) Can Subnational Autonomy Strengthen Democracy in Bolivia?Publius: The Journal of Federalism44(1): 51–81.
19.
FavoreuLouisGaiaPatrickGhevontianRichardMestreJean-LouisPfersmannOttoRouxAndréScoffoniGuy (2012) Droit cConstitutionnel. Paris: Dalloz.
20.
FenwickTracy Beck (2016) Avoiding Governors: Federalism, democracy, and poverty alleviation in Brazil and Argentina. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
21.
FilippovMikhailOrdeshookPeterShvetsovaOlga (2004) Designing Federalism: A theory of self-sustainable federal institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Font i LlovetTomás (2006) El régimen local en la reforma de los Estatutos de Autonomía. In Font i LlovetTFranciscoVLuisO (eds) El régimen local en la reforma de los Estatutos de Autonomía. Madrid: CEPC, 11–39.
23.
GarcíaFernando Domínguez (2009) Autonomy Experiences in Europe – A comparative approach: Portugal, Spain and Italy. In JorgeOPauloC (eds) One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders – Perspectives of Evolution. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 409–441.
24.
GerringJohn (2010) Case Selection for Case-study Analysis: Qualitative and quantitative techniques. In Box-SteffensmeierJBradyHCollierD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 645–684.
25.
HagueRodHarropMartin (2010) Comparative Government and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HalberstamDaniel (2012) Federalism: theory, policy, law. In RosenfeldMichaelSajóAndrás (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 576–608.
27.
HalberstamDanielReimannMatthias (2014) Federalism and Legal Unification: Comparing methods, results, and explanations across 20 systems. In DanielHMatthiasR (eds) Federalism and Legal Unification: A comparative empirical investigation of twenty systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 3–67.
28.
HamonFrancis (2001) Les formes d’État: Essai de typologie. Revue Politique Et Parlementaire1009/1010: 28–35.
29.
InmanRobertRubinfeldDaniel (2009) Why Federalism Matters: Implications for tax policy. Sho Sato Conference held on March 9–10, Berkeley: Institute for Legal Research.
KemanHans (2000) Federalism and Policy Performance: A conceptual and empirical inquiry. In Wachendorfer-SchmidtU (ed.) Federalism and Political Performance. London: Routledge, 196–227.
32.
KincaidJohn (2005) Comparative Observations. In JohnKAlanGT (eds) Constitutional Origins, Structure and Change in Federal Countries. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 409–448.
33.
LoughlinJohn (2008) Federal and Local Government Institutions. In DanieleC (ed.) Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 198–215.
34.
Machado HortaRaul (2003) Direito constitucional. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey.
35.
MunckGerardo L (2010) Comparative Politics: Taking stock and looking forward. In AndreasS (ed.) Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series No. 30. Austin, Texas: CIDE, IPSA, C&M.
36.
PrélotMarcel (1990) Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel. Paris: Dalloz.
37.
RequejoFerran (2005) Multinational Federalism and Value Pluralism. The Spanish case. London: Routledge.
38.
RhodesRoderick AW (2001) Unitary States. In NeilSPaulB (eds) International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Science. New York: Elsevier, 15968–15971.
39.
RikerWilliam (2007) Federalism. In RobertGPhilipPThomasP (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Volume I. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 612–620.
40.
RouthSteven R (2011) Unitary Government. In GeorgeK (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington DC: CQ Press, 1713–1714.
41.
RuipérezJavier (2003) La constitución del estado de las autonomías. Teoría constitucional y práctica política en el Federalising Process Español. Madrid: Bibliotheca Nueva.
42.
SartoriGiovanni (1987) The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
43.
SuksiMarkku (2011) Sub-state Governance through Territorial Autonomy: A comparative study in constitutional law of powers, procedures and institutions. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
44.
SwendenWilfried (2006) Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe: A comparative and thematic analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
45.
TreismanDaniel (2007) The Architecture of Government: Rethinking political decentralisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WattsRonald (2008) Comparing Federal Systems. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
47.
WattsRonald (2013) Typologies of Federalism. In JohnLJohnKWilfriedS (eds) Routledge Handbook of Regionalism and Federalism. Abingdon: Routledge, 19–33.
48.
WheareKenneth (1947) Federal Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
ZillerJaques (2001) L’état composé et son avenir en France. Revue Politique et Parlementaire1009/1010: 151–157.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
