Deliberative democracy is for many the most significant development in democratic theory in the last 50 years and it has been used in some places to solve real-world policy problems. However, measuring the impact of deliberative methods is not clearly achievable because several independent variables are manipulated simultaneously. One of the main goals of deliberation is opinion change and thus it is important to understand why opinions change. This paper utilises comparison groups in order to isolate the impact of deliberation from information in the deliberative process. We outline the results of a quasi-experiment in which deliberation took place in a citizens’ assembly (CA) in Ireland. As part of this we measured the impact using pre- and post-test controls, including a group given the information the CA participants received, but without the deliberation. The results of the analysis provide evidence of a separate deliberation effect.
AndersenVibekeHansenKasper (2007) How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens: The Danish deliberative poll on the Euro. European Journal of Political Research46(4): 531–556.
2.
AngristJoshua DPischkeJörn-Steffan (2015) Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BaccaroLucioBächtigerAndréDevilleMarion (2016) Small Differences that Matter: The impact of discussion modalities on deliberative outcomes. British Journal of Politics and International Relations46(3): 551–566.
4.
BächtigerAndréParkinsonJohn (2019) Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BächtigerAndréGerberMarlène (2013) Gentlemanly Conversation or Vigorous Debate? Evidence from a transnational deliberative poll (Europolis). In BächtigerAndréGrönlundKimmoSetäläMaija (eds) Deliberative Mini-Publics. Promises, Practices and Pitfalls. Colchester: ECPR Press. pp. 115-134
6.
BarabasJason (2004) How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions. American Political Science Review98(4): 687–701.
7.
BernhagenPatrickSchmittHermann (2014) Deliberation, Political Knowledge and Vote Choice: Results from an experiment with second-order elections. European Union Politics15(3): 352–371.
8.
ChambersSimone (2003) Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science6: 307–326.
9.
CookThomas DWongVivian C (2008) Better Quasi-Experimental Practice. In AlasuutariPerttiBickmanLeonardBrannenJulia (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods. London: Sage. Pp. 134-165
10.
DryzekJohn (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
DryzekJohnBraithwaiteValerie (2000) On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology21(2): 241–266.
12.
EsterlingKevin MNebloMichael ALazerDavid MJ (2011) Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A deliberative field experiment with members of Congress and their constituents. Public Opinion Quarterly75(3): 483–503.
13.
FarrellDavid MO’MalleyEoinSuiterJane (2013) Deliberative Democracy in Action Irish-style: The 2011 We the Citizens pilot citizens’ assembly. Irish Political Studies28(1): 99–113.
14.
FishkinJames S (1995) The Voice of the People. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
FishkinJames S (2009) When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
FishkinJames SLuskinRobert C (2005) Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica40(3): 284–298.
17.
FishkinJames SLuskinRobert CJowellRoger (2000) Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation. Parliamentary Affairs53(4): 657–666.
18.
FlindersMatthewGhoseKatieJenningsWillMolloyEdwardProsserBrendanRenwickAlanSmithGraham (2016) Democracy Matters: Lessons from the 2015 Citizens’ Assemblies on English Devolution. London: Democracy Matters.
19.
FournierPatrickVan der KolkHenkCartyR KennethBlaisAndreRoseJonathan (2011) When Citizens Decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GaertnerSamuel LDovidioJohn FRustMary CNierJason ABankerBrenda SWardChristine MMottolaGary RHouletteMissy (1999) Reducing Intergroup Bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(3): 388–402.
21.
GoodinRobert ENiemeyerSimon J (2003) When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies51(4): 627–649.
22.
HimmelroosStaffanChristensenHenrik Serup (2013) Deliberation and Opinion Change: Evidence from a deliberative mini-public in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies37(1): 41–60.
23.
IserniaPierangeloFishkinJames (2014) The EuroPolis Deliberative Poll. European Union Politics15(3): 311–327.
24.
JohnPeterSturgisPatrick JSmithGrahamNomuraHisako (2009) Deliberation and Internet Engagement: Initial findings from a randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of facilitated internet forums, paper presented at American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada.
25.
KochJeffrey (1998) Political Rhetoric and Political Persuasion: The changing structure of citizens’ preferences on health insurance during policy debate. Public Opinion Quarterly62(2): 209–229.
26.
KrosnickJon APettyRichard E (1995) Attitude Strength: An overview. In PettyRichard EKrosnickJon A (eds) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
LuskinRobert CFishkinJames SJowellRoger (2002) Considered Opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science32(3): 455–487.
28.
LuskinRobert CIyengarShantoFishkinJames S (2004) Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Face-to-face versus online deliberative polling. Research Paper. Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford: Stanford University.
29.
MortonRebecca BWilliamsKenneth C (2010) Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MuhlbergerPeterWeberLori M (2006) Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: The effects of agency, identity, information, and deliberation on political knowledge. Journal of Public Deliberation2(1): Article 13.
31.
MutzDiana C (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MutzDiana C (2008) Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science11: 521–538.
33.
NebloMichael AEsterlingKevin MKennedyRyan PLazerDavid MJSokheyAnand E (2010) Who Wants to Deliberate—and Why?American Political Science Review104: 566–583.
34.
PageBenjamin (1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
PriceVincentCapellaJoseph N (2007) Healthcare Dialogue: Project Highlights. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Digital Government Research, Philadelphia, PA.
36.
SandersDavid (2012) The Effects of Deliberative Polling in an EU-wide Experiment: Five mechanisms in search of any explanation. British Journal of Political Science42(3): 617–640.
37.
SkyrmsBrian (1990) The Dynamics of Rational Decision Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38.
SmetsKaatIserniaPierangelo (2014) The Role of Deliberation in Attitude Change: An empirical assessment of three theoretical mechanisms. European Union Politics15(3): 389–409.
39.
StasserGaroldTitusWilliam (1985) Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48(6): 1467–1478.
40.
SteenbergenMarco RBächtigerAndréSpörndliMarkusSteinerJürg (2003) Measuring Political Deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics1(1): 21–48.
41.
SteinerJürgBächtigerAndréSpörndliMarkusSteenbergenMarco R (2004) Deliberative Politics in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SuiterJaneFarrellDavid MO’MalleyEoin (2016) When do Deliberative Citizens Change Their Opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens Assembly. International Political Science Review37(2): 198–212.
43.
TaberCharles S (2003) Information Processing and Public Opinion. In SearsDavid OHuddieLeonieJervisRobert (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
VillaJuan M (2016) ‘diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata Journal16(1): 52–71.
45.
ZallerJohn R (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
