Why do regional security organizations choose different approaches to implementing global gender norms? To address this question, we examine how the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the European Union (EU) integrated requirements derived from UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325) on women, peace and security into their security policies. We identify differences in scope and dynamics between the change processes in the two organizations. The OSCE simply adapted its existing gender policy and has not changed it since, whereas the EU introduced a new, more extensive and specific policy, which it has already amended several times. Drawing on historical institutionalism and feminist institutionalism, we found that, first, reform coalitions prepared the ground for gender mainstreaming in the organizations’ respective security policies; and that, second, embedded policy structures, including rules and norms about external interaction as well as existing policy legacies, were responsible for the different approaches of the EU and OSCE with respect to UNSCR 1325.
BarnettMichaelFinnemoreMartha (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
CapocciaGiovanniKelemenR Daniel (2007) The Study of Critical Junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics59(3): 341–369.
3.
ChappellLouiseWaylenGeorgina (2013) Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions. Public Administration91(3): 599–615.
Council of the European Union (2008) Comprehensive Approach to the EU Implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and 1820 on Women, Peace and Security. Brussels: 15671/1/08 REV 1. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/hr/news187.pdf
6.
Council of the European Union (2010) Indicators for the Comprehensive approach to the EU implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 on women, peace and security. Brussels. Available at: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/10/st11/st11948.en10.pdf
7.
DembinskiMatthiasJoachimJutta (2014) Civil Society and the European Common Security and Defence Policy. European Security23(4): 449–465.
8.
ElgströmOle (2000) Norm Negotiations: The construction of new norms regarding gender and development in EU foreign aid policy. Journal of European Public Policy7(3): 457–476.
FioretosOrfeo (2011) Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization65(2): 367–399.
13.
GuerrinaRobertaWrightKatharine AM (2016) Gendering Normative Power Europe: Lessons of the women, peace and security agenda. International Affairs92(2): 293–312.
HanriederTine (2014) Gradual Change in International Organisations: Agency theory and historical institutionalism. Politics34(4): 324–333.
16.
HawkinsDarren GLakeDavid ANielsonDaniel ATierneyMichael J (2006) Delegation Under Anarchy: States, international organizations, and principal–agent theory. In HawkinsDarren GLakeDavid ANielsonDaniel ATierneyMichael J (eds) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–38.
17.
KoopsJoachim A (2012) NATO’s Influence on the Evolution of the European Union as a Security Actor. In CostaOriolJørgensenKnud E (eds) The Influence of International Institutions on the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–185.
18.
KronsellAnnica (2016) Sexed Bodies and Military Masculinities: Gender path dependence in EU’s common security and defense policy. Men and Masculinities19(3): 311–336.
19.
LukatelaAna (2016) Implementing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda in the OSCE: The power of middle management norms in the policy process. Security and Human Rights27(1–2): 45–58.
20.
MackayFionaKennyMerylChappellLouise (2010) New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism?International Political Science Review31(5): 573–588.
21.
MahoneyJamesThelenKathleen (2010) A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In MahoneyJamesThelenKathleen (eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–37.
22.
MoschellaManuelaVetterleinAntje (2014) International Organizations and Organizational Fields: Explaining policy change in the IMF. European Political Science Review6(1): 143–165.
23.
OrmhaugChristin (2014) OSCE Study on National Action Plans on the Implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. Vienna: OSCE. Available at: http://www.osce.org/secretariat/125727?download=true
24.
OSCE (2004) Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. Vienna: MC.
25.
OSCE (2005) Decision No. 14/05: Women in Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Post-Conflict Rehabilitation. Vienna: MC.
26.
OSCE (2010) The OSCE and ‘Women, Peace and Security’: 10 Years after the adoption of UNSCR 1325. Vienna: High-Level Tripartite Meeting, 14 June 2010. Available at: http://www.osce.org/gender/70694?download=true
27.
OSCE (2015) In Pursuit of Peace and Security: How Gender Makes a Difference. Vienna: Report from the OSCE Security Days, 13 November 2015. Available at: http://www.osce.org/sg/216776?download=true
28.
OSCE (2000–2015) Annual Reports. Vienna. Available at: www.osce.org
29.
OSCE Delegation of the Russian Federation (2016) Statement by Mr. Alexander Lukashevich, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation, paper presented at the 1092nd meeting of the OSCE Permanent Council, Vienna: OSCE. Available at: http://www.osce.org/pc/227906?download=true
30.
OSCE and Inclusive Security (2016) Designing Inclusive Strategies for Sustainable Security: Results-oriented National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security, Vienna, OSCE. Available at: http://www.osce.org/secretariat/294731?download=true
31.
ParkSusan (2006) Theorizing Norm Diffusion Within International Organizations. International Politics43(3): 342–361.
32.
PiersonPaul (2000) Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review94(2): 251–267.
SjobergLaura (2013) Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
SquatritoTheresaSommererThomasTallbergJonas (2016) Transnational Access to International Organizations, 1950–2010: Structural factors and critical junctures. In ThomasRixenViolaLora AnneZürnMichael (eds) Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–196.
36.
UN Security Council (2000) Resolution 1325, adopted at 4213th meeting, 31 October 2000. New York: UN Security Council.
37.
UN Security Council (2009) Resolution 1889, adopted at 6196th meeting, 5 October 2009. New York: UN Security Council.
38.
WaylenGeorgina (2009) What Can Historical Institutionalism Offer Feminist Institutionalists?Politics & Gender5(2): 245–253.
39.
WeinerElaineMacRaeHeather (2014) The Persistent Invisibility of Gender in EU Policy: Introduction. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 18: Art. 3.
40.
WoodwardAlison (2003) Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and informal governance. In ThomasChristiansenPiattoniSimona (eds) Informal Governance in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 76–93.
41.
WoodwardAlison Evan der VleutenAnna (2014) EU and the Export of Gender Equality Norms: Myths and facts. In van der VleutenAnnavan EerdewijkAnoukaRoggebandConny (eds) Gender Equality Norms in Regional Governance: Transnational Dynamics in Europe, South America and Southern Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 67–92.
42.
WrightKatharine AM (2016) NATO’S adoption of UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security: Making the agenda a reality. International Political Science Review37(3): 350–361.
43.
ZürnMichael (2016) Historical Institutionalism and International Relations – Strange Bedfellows? In RixenThomasViolaLora AnneZürnMichael (eds) Historical Institutionalism and International Relations: Explaining Institutional Development in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 199–228.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
