Comparative economic voting studies have found great instability in economic voting across countries and over time. In explaining this instability, we highlight the role of welfare systems because strong welfare protection attenuates voters’ incentives to base their vote on government economic performance. By analyzing 174 legislature elections in 31 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1980 to 2010 and by taking into account clarity of responsibility, we find that welfare protection weakens the linkage between macroeconomic outcomes and incumbent electoral fortunes. This result implies that strong welfare protection enables politicians to avoid blame for economic failures.
AlaezRDiaz de BasurtoPOlaskoagaJ(2008) The Drawback of Welfare Effort in Measuring Social Spending Trends. Working paper-Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economı’a, UPNA.
2.
AndersonChristopher J (1995) The Dynamics of Public Support for Coalition Governments. Comparative Political Studies 28(3): 350–383.
3.
AguilarEdwin EPacekAlexander C (2000) Macroeconomic Conditions, Voter Turnout, and the Working Class Economically Disadvantaged Party Vote in Developing Countries. Comparative Political Studies33(8): 995–1017.
4.
BerryWilliam DGolderMattMiltonDaniel(2012) Improving Test of Theories Positing Interaction. The Journal of Politics74(3): 653–671.
5.
BradyDavidFullertonAndrew SCrossJennifer M (2009) Putting Poverty in Political Context: A multi-level analysis of adult poverty across 18 affluent democracies. Social Forces88(1): 271–300.
DassonnevilleRuthLewis-BeckMichael S (2014) Macroeconomics, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes: A National European Pool. Acta Politica49(4): 372–394.
8.
DorussenHanTaylorMichael (2002) Economic Voting. New York: Routledge.
9.
DuchRaymond MStevensonRandolph T (2008) Voting in Context: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition the Economic Vote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Esping-AndersenGøsta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
FidrmucJan (2000) Economics of Voting in Post-Communist Countries. Electoral Studies19(2–3): 199–217.
12.
FossatiDiego (2014) Economic Vulnerability and Economic Voting in 14 OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Science53(1): 116–135.
13.
GélineauFrançois (2013) Electoral Accountability in the Developing World. Electoral Studies32(3): 418–424.
14.
HellwigTimothySamuelsDavid (2007) Voting in Open Economies: The electoral consequences of globalization. Comparative Political Studies40(3): 283–306.
15.
HoboltSara BTilleyJames (2014) Who’s in Charge? How Voters Attribute Responsibility in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies47(6): 795–819.
16.
HoboltSara BTilleyJamesBanducciSusan (2013) Clarity of Responsibility: How government cohesion conditions performance voting. European Journal of Political Research52(1): 164–187.
17.
InglehartRonald (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economics, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
KeeleLukeKellyNathan J (2006). Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis14(2): 186–205.
19.
KellstedtPaul MWhittenGuy D (2013) The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lewis-BeckMichael S (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Lewis-BeckMichael S (1997) Who’s the Chef? Economic Voting under a Dual Executive. European Journal of Political Research31(3): 315–325.
22.
Lewis-BeckMichael SStegmaierMary (2013) The VP-Function Revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice157(3): 367–385.
23.
MargalitYotam (2011) Costly Jobs: Trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in U.S. elections. American Political Science Review105(1): 166–188.
24.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard GYoshinakaAntoine (2002) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking account of the political context across time and nations. Electoral Studies21(3): 403–423.
25.
NannestadPeterPaldamMartin (1994) The VP Function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice79(3–4): 213–245.
26.
NarudHanne M (1996) Party Politics and Government Accountability: A comparison between the Netherlands and Norway. Party Politics2(4): 479–507.
27.
Olaskoaga-LarrauriJonAláez-AllerRicardoDíaz-de-BasurtoPablo (2010) Measuring is Believing! Improving Conventional Indicators of Welfare State Development. Social Indicators Research96(1):113–131
28.
PacekAlexander CRadcliffBenjamin (1995) Economic Voting and the Welfare State: A cross-national analysis. The Journal of Politics57(1): 44–61.
29.
PalmerHarvey DWhittenGuy D (2002) Economics, Politics, and the Cost of Ruling in Advanced Industrial Democracies: How much does context matter? In DorussenHanMichaelTaylor (eds) Economic Voting. Oxford: Routledge, 66–90.
30.
PowellG Bingham (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
PowellG BinghamWhittenGuy D (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
32.
RadcliffBenjamin (1992) The Welfare State, Turnout, and the Economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review86(2): 444–454.
33.
RemmerKaren L (1991) The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin American in the 1980s. American Political Science Review85(3): 777–800.
34.
RobertsAndrew (2008) Hyperaccountability: Economic voting in Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies27(2008): 533–546.
35.
ScruggsLyleJahnDetlefKuittoKati (2014) Comparative Welfare Entitlements Data Set 2, Version 2014–03. Available at: http://cwed2.org/
36.
ScruggsLyle (2014) Social Welfare Generosity Score in CWED2: A Methodological Genealogy. CWED Working Paper 01, February2014.
37.
SekiKatsunoriWilliamsLaron K (2014) Updating the Party Government Data Set. Electoral Studies34: 270–279.
38.
ShinJungsub (2016) The Consequences of Government Ideology and Taxation on Welfare Voting. Political Research Quarterly69(3): 430–443.
39.
SingerMatthew (2011a) Economic Voting and Welfare Programmes: Evidence from the American States. European Journal of Political Science50(4): 479–503.
40.
SingerMatthew (2011b) Who Says ‘It’s the Economy? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies44(3): 284–312.
41.
SingerMatthew (2013) The Global Economic Crisis and Domestic Political Agendas. Electoral Studies32(3): 404–410.
42.
van der BrugWouterEijkCees van derFranklinMark (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WhittenGuy DPalmerHarvey D (1999) Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting. Electoral Studies18(1): 49–67.
44.
WilliamsLaron KSekiKatsunoriWhittenGuy D (2016) You’ve Got Some Explaining to Do: The Influence of Economic Conditions and Spatial Competition on Party Strategy. Political Science Research and Methods4(1): 47-63.
45.
WooldridgeJeffrey M (2013) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th edition.Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
