Feminist institutionalism is concerned with the ‘rules of the game’ in political institutions. It is interested to explore how institutions create gender-just conditions in terms of the policies and actions they undertake and the make-up of the elected representatives they contain. It also has a growing interest in how institutions can resist or obstruct positive gendered change. It is argued here that employing the concept of ‘critical actors’ alongside a feminist institutionalist framework can further our understanding of why some institutions resist change. Using the example of abortion legislation in Northern Ireland, this article illustrates how the literatures on feminist institutionalism and critical actors can, when combined, help to build a fuller narrative of why gendered policy change does not happen.
AckerJ, 1992, “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions”, Contemporary Sociology, 21(5): 565–569.
2.
BanaszakLee AnnBeckwithKarenRuchtDieter (eds) (2003) Women’s Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeckwithKarenCowell-MeyersKimberly (2007) Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation, Perspectives on Politics, 5(3): 553–565.
4.
BloomerFionaFeganEileen (2014) Critiquing Recent Abortion Law and Policy in Northern Ireland. Critical Social Policy34(1): 109–120.
5.
ChaneyPaul (2012) “Critical Actors vs. Critical Mass: The Substantive Representation of Women in the Scottish Parliament”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(3): 441–457.
6.
ChappellLouise (2002) Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
7.
ChappellLouise (2006) Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”. Politics & Gender2(2): 223–235.
8.
ChappellLouise (2014a) ‘New’, ‘Old’, and ‘Nested’ Institutions and Gender Justice Outcomes: A view from the International Criminal Court. Politics & Gender10(4): 572–594.
9.
ChappellLouise (2014b) Conflicting Institutions and the Search for Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court. Political Research Quarterly67(1): 183–196.
10.
ChappellLouise (2015) The Politics of Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court: Legacies and Legitimacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChildsSarahKrookMona Lena (2006) Should Feminists Give up on Critical Mass? A contingent yes. Politics and Gender2(4): 522–530.
12.
ChildsSarahKrookMona Lena (2009) Analyzing Women’s Substantive Representation: from critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2): 125–145.
GalliganYvonne (2006) Women in Northern Ireland’s Politics: feminizing an ‘armed patriarchy’. In SawerMarianTremblayManonTrimbleLinda (eds) Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. London, UK: Routledge, 204–220.
18.
GalliganYvonneWilfordRick (1999) Women’s Political Representation in Ireland. In GalliganYvonneWardEilísWilfordRick (eds) Contesting Politics: Women in Ireland Northern and South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 109–129.
19.
GeorgeAlexanderBennettAndrew (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HalfmannDrew (2011) Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain and Canada. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HorganGorettiO’ConnorJennifer (2014) Abortion and Citizenship Rights in a Devolved Region of the UK. Social Policy and Society13(1): 29–49.
22.
KennyMeryl (2007) “Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review”, Politics27(2): 91–100.
23.
KennyMeryl (2013) Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
KennyMerylMackayFiona (2009) Already Doin’ it for Ourselves: skeptical notes on feminism and institutionalism. Politics & Gender5(2): 271–280.
25.
KrookMona LenaMackayFiona (2011) Introduction: gender, politics and institutions. In KrookMona LenaMackayFiona (eds) Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–20.
26.
KulawikTeresa (2009) Staking the Frame of a Feminist Discursive Institutionalism. Politics & Gender5(2): 262–271.
27.
LeeSimon (1995) An A to K to Z of Abortion Law in Northern Ireland: abortion on remand. In FurediAnne (ed.) The Abortion Law in Northern Ireland: Human Rights and Reproductive Choice. Belfast, NI: Family Planning Association Northern Ireland, 27–45.
28.
MackayFiona (2006) Descriptive and Substantive Representation in New Parliamentary Space: the case of Scotland. In SawerMarianTremblayManonTrimbleLinda (eds) Representing Women in Parliament: A comparative study. London, UK: Routledge, 171–187.
29.
MackayFiona (2010) Devolution and the Multilevel Politics of Gender in the UK: The case of Scotland. In HaussmanMelissaSawerMarianVickersJill (eds) Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance. London, UK: Routledge, 155–168.
30.
MackayFiona (2014) Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change. Politics & Gender10(4): 549–571.
31.
MackayFionaMonroSuryaWaylenGeorgina (2009) The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism. Politics & Gender5(2): 253–262.
32.
MackayFionaKennyMerylChappellLouise (2010) New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: towards a feminist institutionalism?International Political Science Review31(5): 573–588.
33.
MackayFionaMcAllisterLaura (2012) Feminising British Politics: six lessons from devolution in Scotland and Wales. Political Quarterly83(3): 730–734.
SawerMarian (2012) “What makes the substantive representation of women possible in a Westminster parliament? The story of RU486 in Australia,” International Political Science Review 33(3): 320–335.
36.
StudlarDonleyMcAllisterIan (2002) Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of women’s legislative representation since 1950, European Journal of Political Research, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 233–253.
37.
TanseyOisín (2007) Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics40(4): 765–772.
38.
ThelenKathleenMahoneyJames (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ThomsonJennifer (2015) Explaining Gender Equality Difference in a Devolved System: The case of abortion law in Northern Ireland. British Politics. Epub ahead of print 9November. DOI: 10.1057/bp.2015.47.
40.
ThomsonJennifer (2016) Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage: how are non-sectarian controversial issues discussed in Northern Irish politics?Irish Political Studies31(4): 483–501.
41.
TongeJonathan (2005) The New Northern Irish Politics?, London: Palgrave.
42.
TongeJonathanEvansJocelyn (2015) “Another Communal Headcount; The Election in Northern Ireland”, Parliamentary Affairs, 68(3): 117–32.
43.
WaylenGeorgina (2007) Engendering Transitions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
WaylenGeorgina (2009) What Can Historical Institutionalism offer Feminist Institutionalists?Politics & Gender5(2): 245–253.
45.
WaylenGeorgina (2014a) Informal Institutions, Institutional Change and Gender Equality. Political Research Quarterly67(1): 212–223.
46.
WaylenGeorgina (2014b) “A seat at the table – is it enough? Gender, multiparty negotiations, and Institutional design in South African and Northern Ireland”, Politics & Gender10(4): 495–523.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
