While many studies of party system nationalization examine the effects of various institutional factors, few take into account the impact of party formation cost. This paper aims to fill the empirical gap by focusing on the interactive effect of electoral systems and party registration rules. I argue that the effect of electoral systems on party system nationalization is conditional on spatial registration rules, a requirement that requires a party to collect signatures or organize local branches in a specified geographical manner to maintain the party’s legal status. Based on data for 97 legislative elections in 18 Latin American countries from 1978 to 2011, the empirical analysis demonstrates that a country with an electoral system that encourages a personal vote tends to have a much lower level of party system nationalization when that country does not have spatial registration requirements. The result is robust across different model specifications and estimation techniques.
Amorim NetoOctavioCoxGary W (1997) Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science41(1): 149–174.
4.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N (1995) What To Do (and Not To Do) With Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
5.
BirnirJóhanna Kristín (2004) Stabilizing Party Systems and Excluding Segments of Society? The effects of formation costs on new party foundation in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development39(3): 3–27.
6.
BochslerDaniel (2010a) Territory and Electoral Rules in Post-Communist Democracies. Houndmills: Palgrave.
7.
BochslerDaniel (2010b) Measuring Party Nationalization: A new Gini-based indicator that corrects for the number of units. Electoral Studies29(1): 155–168.
8.
BrancatiDawn (2005) Pawns Take Queen: The destabilizing effects of regional parties in Europe. Constitutional Political Economy16(2): 143–159.
9.
BrancatiDawn (2008) The Origins and Strengths of Regional Parties. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 135–159.
10.
CainBruce EFerejohnJohnFiorinaMorris P (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
CaramaniDaniele (2004) The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CaramaniDaniele (2014) The Europeanization of Electoral Politics: An analysis of converging voting distributions in 30 European party systems, 1970–2008. Party Politics18(6): 803–823.
13.
CareyJohn MShugartMatthew Soberg (1995) Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
14.
Castañeda-AngaritaNéstor (2013) Party System Nationalization, Presidential Coalitions, and Government Spending. Electoral Studies32(4): 783–794.
15.
ChhibberPradeep KKollmanKen (2004) The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ConwayMargaret M (1986) Republican Political Party Nationalization, Campaign Activities, and their Implications for the Party System. Publius13(1): 1–17.
17.
CoxGary W (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CrispBrian FOlivellaSantiagoPotterJoshua D. (2013) Party-System Nationalization and the Scope of Public Policy: The importance of cross-district constituency similarity. Comparative Political Studies46(4): 431–456.
DošekTomáš (2015) La nacionalización de los partidos y sistemas de partidos en América Latina: Concepto, medición y reciente desarrollo de su estudio en la región [The nationalization of parties and party systems in Latin America. Concept, measurement and study recent development in the región]. Política y Gobierno22(2): 347–390. (In Spanish.)
21.
FearonJames D (2003) Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 195–222.
22.
GolosovGrigorii V (2016) Factors of Party System Nationalization. International Political Science Review37(2): 246–260.
23.
HarbersImke (2010) Decentralization and the Development of Nationalized Party Systems in New Democracies: Evidence from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies43(5): 606–627.
24.
HickenAllenKollmanKenSimmonsJoel W (2016) Party System Nationalization and the Provision of Public Health Services. Political Science Research and Methods4(3): 573–594.
25.
HoDanielImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth (2007) Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis15(3): 199–236.
26.
HugSimon (2001) Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
27.
ImaiKosukevan DykDavid A (2004) Causal Inference with General Treatment Regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association99: 854–866.
JonesMark P (2007) Political parties and party systems in Latin America. Symposium of Prospects for Democracy in Latin America, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, April 5–6.
30.
JonesMark PMainwaringScott (2003) The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics9(2): 139–166.
31.
KollmanKenHickenAllenCaramaniDanieleBackerDavidLublinDavid (2016) Constituency-level elections archive. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.
32.
MolenaarFransje (2014) Legitimising Political Party Representation: Party law development in Latin America. International Political Science Review35(3): 324–338.
33.
MorganStephen LWinshipChristopher (2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MorgensternScottSwindleStephen MCastagnolaAndrea (2009) Party Nationalization and Institutions. Journal of Politics71(4): 1322–1341.
35.
MustilloThomas (2007) Entrants in the Political Arena: New Party Trajectories During the Third Wave of Democracy in Latin America. PhD Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
36.
MustilloThomasMustilloSarah A (2012) Party Nationalization in a Multilevel Context: Where’s the variance?Electoral Studies31(2): 422–433.
37.
NielsonDaniel L (2003) Supplying Trade Reform: Political institutions and liberalization in middle-income presidential democracies. American Journal of Political Science47(3): 470–491.
38.
SchattschneiderElmer Eric (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
39.
ScherlisGerardo (2014) Political Legitimacy, Fragmentation and the Rise of Party-Formation Costs in Contemporary Latin America. International Political Science Review35(3): 307–323.
40.
SimónPablo (2013) The Combined Impact of Decentralisation and Personalism on the Nationalisation of Party Systems. Political Studies61(S1): 24–44.
41.
SteinErnestoTommasiMarianoEchebarríaKoldoLoraEduardoPayneJ Mark (2005) The Politics of Policies: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2006 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Available at: http://www.iadb.org/res/ipes/2006/pdfs/frontmatter.pdf
42.
SuYen-Pin (2015) Party Registration Rules and Party Systems in Latin America. Party Politics21(2): 295–308.
43.
ThorlaksonLori (2007) An Institutional Explanation of Party System Congruence: Evidence from six federations. European Journal of Political Research46(1): 69–95.
44.
VasselaiFabricio (2009) Comparing the nationalization of party systems in 43 democracies. 21th [sic] IPSA World Congress of Political Science, Santiago, Chile. Available at: http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_2852.pdf
45.
Wills-OteroLauraPérez-LiñánAníbal (2012) Sistemas electorales y derechos políticos en América Latina 1900–2008 [Electoral Systems and Political Rights in Latin America, 1900–2008]. In: AnyulMartín PuchetRojasMarianoSalazarRodrigoValentiGiovannaUgaldeFrancisco Valdés (eds) América Latina en los albores del siglo XXI-2: Aspectos sociales y políticos. México: Flacso-México, 279–300 (in Spanish).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
