Definitions of democracy almost always refer to dimensions. An important question arises about the internal relationships between them. This article presents arguments in favor of the ideas of mutual reinforcement as well as of intrinsic tensions or trade-offs. A well-known example of these kinds of trade-offs is the complex relationship between liberty and equality. Surprisingly, trade-offs are not reported when measuring democracy. The article identifies the basic methodological problem and develops a new strategy for evaluating the indicators which makes trade-offs visible in the empirical research. The proposal combines two measurement strategies, arguing that in addition to established measurements of democracy, a further measurement to assess trade-offs should be employed.
AlexyRobert (1998) Die Institutionalisierung der Menschenrechte im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat. In GosepathStefanLohmannGeorg (eds) Philosophie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp, 244–264.
2.
AltmanDPérez-LinánA (2002) Assessing the Quality of Democracy: freedom, competitiveness and participation in eighteen Latin American countries. Democratization9(2): 85–100.
3.
BerlinIsaiah (1969) Two Concepts of Liberty. In BerlinIsaiah (ed) Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–172
4.
BöckenfördeErnst-Wolfgang (1991) Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie: Studien zur Verfassungstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
5.
BühlmannMarcMerkelWolfgangMüllerLisaWesselsBernhard (2008) Quality of Democracy: Democracy Barometer for Established Democracies. Working Paper No. 10a, National Center for Competence in Research Democracy, University Zürich und WZB. Available at: http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/pdf/WP10a.pdf
6.
BühlmannMarcMerkelWolfgangMüllerLisaGieblerHeikoWeßelsBernhard (2012) Demokratiebarometer: ein neues Instrument zur Messung von Demokratiequalität. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft6(S1): 115–159.
7.
CoppedgeMichaelGerringJohnAltmanDavidBernhardMichaelFishStevenHickenAllenKroenigMatthewLindbergStaffan IMcMannKellyPaxtonPamelaSemetkoHolli A.SkaaningSvend-ErikStatonJeffreyTeorellJan (2011) Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: a new approach. Perspectives on Politics9(2): 247–267.
DahlRobert A (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT and London, UK: Yale University Press.
12.
DiamondLarryMorlinoLeonardo (2004) The Quality of Democracy. An Overview. Journal of Democracy15 (4): 20-31
13.
DiamondLarryMorlinoLeonardo (eds) (2005) Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
DworkinRonald (1996) Do Liberty and Equality Conflict? In BarkerPaul (ed) Living as Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39–58.
15.
ElsterJonSlagstadtRune (eds) (1988) Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FishmanRobert M (2016) Rethinking Dimensions of Democracy for Empirical Analysis: authenticity, quality, depth, and consolidation. Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 289–309.
17.
HabermasJürgen (1996) Über den internen Zusammenhang von Rechtsstaat und Demokratie. In: HabermasJürgenDie Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp: 293–305.
18.
HöffeOtfried (1999) Wieviel Politik ist dem Verfassungsgericht erlaubt?Der Staat38(2): 171–193.
19.
InglehartRonald (1977) The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Public. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
LijphartArend (1994) Democracies: Forms, Performance, and Constitutional Engineering. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 25 (1): 1–18.
21.
LijphartArend (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
22.
LauthHans-Joachim (2004) Demokratie und Demokratiemessung (Democratic Theory and Measuring Democracy). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
23.
LauthHans-Joachim (2013) Core Criteria for Democracy: is responsiveness part of the inner circle? In BössMichaelMøllerJørgenSkaaningSvend-Erik (eds) Developing Democracies: Democracy, Democratization, and Development. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 37–49.
24.
LauthHans-Joachim (2015) The Matrix of Democracy: A Three-Dimensional Approach to Measuring the Quality of Democracy and Regime Transformations, Würzburger Arbeitspapiere zur Politikwissenschaft und Sozialforschung (WAPS) No. 6. Available at: https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/10966
25.
MerkelWolfgang (2014) Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy?Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft8(2): 109–128.
26.
MunckGerardo (2009) Measuring Democracy: A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
MunckGerardo (2016) What is Democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization23(1): 1–26.
28.
O’DonnellGuillermoCullellJorge VargasIazzettaOsvaldo M. (eds) (2004) The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
29.
PatemanCarole (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
PennockJ. Roland (1979) Democratic Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
ShapiroIan (2005) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
StreeckWolfgang (2014) Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.
33.
SunsteinCass R (1988) Constitutions and Democracies: an epilogue. In ElsterJonSlagstadRune (eds) Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 327–353.
34.
TeorellJan (2006) Political Participation and Three Theories of Democracy: a research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research45(5): 787–810.
