Recent studies show that the effects of electoral systems and ethnic cleavages on the number of parties in emerging democracies differ from those effects observed in more established democracies. Building on recent arguments maintaining that the quality of democracy improves with experience, we argue the reason for the differences in the findings between established and emerging democracies is that the effects of these variables on the number of parties differ according to a country’s experience with elections. To test this argument, we analyse party system fragmentation in 89 established and emerging democracies and the conditioning effects experience with elections have on the effects of district magnitude, ethnic cleavages and variables relating to the presidential party system. The results show that the effects of institutional and social cleavage variables differ substantially between emerging and established democracies, but these effects begin to approximate those seen in more established democracies with additional experience with elections.
Amorim NetoOctavioCoxGary W (1997) Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science41(1): 149–174.
2.
BakkeElisabethSitterNick (2005) Patterns of stability: Party competition and strategy in Central Europe since 1989. Party Politics11(2): 243–263.
3.
BlaisAndréTurgeonMathieu (2004) How good are voters at sorting out the weakest candidate in their constituency?Electoral Studies23(3): 455–461.
4.
BogaardsMatthijs (2004) Counting parties and identifying dominant party systems in Africa. European Journal of Political Research43(2): 173–197.
5.
BogaardsMatthijs (2008) Dominant party systems and electoral volatility in Africa: A comment on Mozaffar and Scarritt. Party Politics14(1): 113–130.
6.
BormannNils-ChristianGolderMatt (2013) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies32(2): 360–369.
BramborThomasClarkWilliam RobertsGolderMatt (2007) Are African party systems different?Electoral Studies26(2): 315–323.
9.
Casal BértoaFernando (2012) Parties, regime and cleavages: Explaining party system institutionalization in East Central Europe. East European Politics28(4): 452–472.
10.
ClarkWilliam RobertsGolderMatt (2006) Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies39(6): 679–708.
11.
CloughEmily C (2007) Strategic voting under conditions of uncertainty: A re-evaluation of Duverger’s law. British Journal of Political Science37(2): 313–332.
12.
CoxGary W (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CoxGary W (1999) Electoral rules and electoral coordination. Annual Review of Political Science2: 145–161.
14.
CrispBrian FOlivellaSantiagoPotterJoshua D (2012) Electoral contexts that impede voter coordination. Electoral Studies31(1): 143–158.
15.
DawishaKarenDeetsStephen (2006) Political learning in post-communist elections. East European Politics and Society20(4): 691–728.
DixRobert H (1989) Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics22(1) 23–38.
18.
DuvergerMaurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
19.
ElsterJonOffeClausPreussUlrich K (1998) Institutional Design in Post-communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
EpperlyBrad (2011) Institutions and legacies: Electoral volatility in the postcommunist world. Comparative Political Studies44(7): 829–853.
21.
ErdmannGeroBasedauMatthias (2008) Party systems in Africa: Problems of categorising and explaining party systems. Journal of Contemporary African Studies26(3): 241–258.
22.
EvansGeoffreyWhitefieldStephen (2006) Explaining the rise and persistence of class voting in postcommunist Russia, 1993–2001. Political Research Quarterly59(1): 23–34.
23.
FearonJames D (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 195–222.
24.
FilippovMikhail GOrdeshookPeter CShvetsovaOlga V (1999) Party fragmentation and presidential elections in postcommunist democracies. Constitutional Political Economy10(1): 3–26.
25.
ForsytheRobertMyersonRoger BRietzThomas AWeberRobert J (1993) An experiment on coordination in multi-candidate elections: The importance of polls and election histories. Social Choice and Welfare10(3): 223–247.
26.
GolderMatt (2005) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000. Electoral Studies24(1): 103–121.
27.
GolderMatt (2006) Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 34–48.
28.
GolderMatt (2007) Replication data for: democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000, http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/10479, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
29.
HydenGoran (2006) African Politics in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
JonesMark P (1994) Presidential election laws and multipartism in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly47(1): 41–57.
31.
JonesMark P (1999) Electoral laws and the effective number of candidates in presidential elections. Journal of Politics61(1): 171–184.
32.
KuenziMichelleLambrightGina (2001) Party system institutionalization in 30 African countries. Party Politics7(4): 437–468.
33.
LaaksoMarkkuTaageperaRein (1979) The ‘effective’ number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
34.
LagoIgnacioComaFerran Martinez i (2012) Forgetting to make votes count: The role of previous democratic experience. Electoral Studies31(2): 413–421.
35.
LewisPaul G (2006) Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: Patterns of stability and consolidation. Democratization13(4): 562–583.
36.
LijphartArend (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37.
LindbergStaffan I (2004) The democratic qualities of competitive elections: Participation, competition, and legitimacy. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics42(1): 61–105.
38.
LindbergStaffan I (2006) Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LipsetSeymour MartinRokkanStein (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
40.
MainwaringScottScullyTimothy R (1995) Party Systems in Latin America. In MainwaringScottScullyTimothy R (eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1–34.
41.
McKelveyRichard DOrdeshookPeter C (1972) A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting. In HerndonJ FBerndJ L (eds) Mathematical Applications in Political Science, Volume 6. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 32–78.
42.
MorgensternScottVázquez-D’ElíaJavier (2007) Electoral laws, parties, and party systems in Latin America. Annual Review of Political Science10: 143–168.
43.
MoserRobert G (1999) Electoral systems and the number of parties in post-communist states. World Politics51(3): 359–384.
44.
MoserRobert GScheinerEthan (2009) Strategic voting in established and new democracies: Ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems. Electoral Studies28(1): 51–61.
45.
MozaffarShaheenScarrittJames RGalaichGlen (2003) Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages, and party systems in Africa’s emerging democracies. American Political Science Review97(3): 379–390.
46.
OrdeshookPeter CShvetsovaOlga V (1994) Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science38(1): 100–123.
47.
PowellJonathan MThyneClayton L (2011) Global instances of coups from 1950–present: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research48(2): 249–259.
48.
PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichael ECheibubJosé AntonioLimongiFernando (1996) Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development31(1): 3–36.
49.
RaymondChristopher D (2013) Increasingly ‘irrational’ party systems: Evidence that there are increasingly more than two parties at the district level. Government and Opposition48(4): 506–525.
50.
RieraPedro (2013) Electoral coordination in mixed-member systems: Does the level of democratic experience matter?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 119–141.
51.
RobertsKenneth MWibbelsErik (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review93(3): 575–590.
52.
RohrschneiderRobertWhitefieldStephen (2009) Understanding cleavages in party systems: Issue position and issue salience in 13 post-communist democracies. Comparative Political Studies42(2): 280–313.
53.
SingerMatthew M (2013) Was Duverger correct? Single-member district election outcomes in 53 countries. British Journal of Political Science43(1): 201–220.
54.
TaageperaRein (1997) Effective number of parties for incomplete data. Electoral Studies16(2): 145–151.
55.
TaageperaReinShugartMatthew Søberg (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
56.
TavitsMargitAnnusTaavi (2006) Learning to make votes count: The role of democratic experience. Electoral Studies25(1): 72–90.
57.
WimmerAndreasCedermanLars-ErikMinBrian (2009) Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global dataset. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
