Recently, economic accountability theory as a means by which to hold political leaders accountable in the industrialized world has been generalized in transitional democracies. The theory advances how mass publics in young democracies evaluate and assess the performance of chief executives based on sociotropic or pocketbook economic evaluations and the occurrence of pivotal political events. The study finds that self-placement on poverty among Filipinos and primordial assessments of hunger are predictors of presidential approval. Pivotal political events involving attempted coups, corrupt practices and executive level malfeasance are not likely to affect presidential approval ratings over time. Furthermore, changes in the national economy have no association with Philippine presidential approval ratings from 1986–2009. The results of the study suggest that political and economic theories of accountability as applied to the developing world should be reassessed by taking into account the non-institutionalization of party systems, strong executive structures, and the politics of personalism, patronage and patrimonialism.
AndersonChristopher J (2007) The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability. Annual Review of Political Science10(1): 271–296.
2.
ArceMoises (2003) Political Violence and Presidential Approval in Peru. The Journal of Politics65(2): 572–583.
3.
BeckNathaniel (1992) Comparing Dynamic Specifications: the case of presidential approval. Political Analysis3(1): 27–50.
4.
BeckNathaniel (1995a) Nuisance Vs. Substance: specifying and estimating time-series cross section models. Political Analysis6(1):1–36.
5.
BeckNathaniel (1995b) What to Do and Not to Do with Time-Series Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
6.
BeckThorstenClarkeGeorgeGroffAlbertoKeeferPhilipWalshPatrick (2001) New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
7.
BentonAllyson L (2005) Dissatisfied Democrats or Retrospective Voters? Economic Hardship, Political Institutions, and Voting Behavior in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies38(4): 417–442.
8.
BowermanBruce (2004) Forecasting, Time Series, and Regression. New York, NY: Cengage.
9.
BrattonMichaelVan de WalleNicolas (1999) Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald (1960) The American Voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
CarrionJulio F (1998) Partisan decline and presidential popularity: The politics and economics of representation in Peru. In Von MettenheimKurtMalloyJames M (eds) Deepening Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
DahlRobert (1998) On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DavisCharles LLangleyRonald E (1995) Presidential Popularity in a Context of Economic Crisis and Political Change: the case of Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development30(3): 24–48.
14.
DominguezJorge IMcCannJames A (1992) Whither the PRI? Explaining Voter Defection in the 1988 Presidential Elections. Electoral Studies11(3): 207–222.
15.
DresselBjorn (2011) The Philippines: how much real democracy?International Political Science Review32(5): 529–545.
16.
FidrmucJan (2000) Economics of Voting in Post-Communist Countries. Electoral Studies19: 199–217.
17.
FoxJohn (1997) Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press.
GomezBradWilsonMatthew (2001) Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in The American Electorate: a theory of heterogeneous attribution. American Journal of Political Science45(4): 899–914.
20.
GuerreroLindaTusalemRollin F (2008) Mass public perceptions of democratization in the Philippines: Consolidation in progress. In ChuYun-hanDiamondLarryNathanAndrew JShinDoh Chull (eds) How East Asians View Democracy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
21.
HutchcroftPaul (1991) Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State: the politics of patrimonial plunder (review essay). World Politics43(3): 414–450.
22.
HutchcroftPaul DRocamoraJoel (2002) Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: addressing the democratic deficit in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies3(2): 259–292.
23.
JohnsonGregg BSchwindt-BayerLeslie (2009) Economic Accountability in Central America. Journal of Politics in Latin America1(3): 33–56.
24.
KasuyaYuko (2008) Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: Anvil Press.
25.
KeeleLukeKellyNathan (2006) Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis14(2): 186–205.
26.
KellyJana M (2003) Counting on the Past or Investing in the Future? Economic and Political Accountability in Fujimori’s Peru. The Journal of Politics65(3): 864–880.
27.
KiewietRoderik D (1983) Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
KinderDonald RKiewietRoderick D (1981) Sociotropic Politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science11(2): 129–161.
29.
KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I (2007) Citizen–politician linkages. In KitscheltHerbertWilkinsonSteven I (eds) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Lewis-BeckMichael S (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Lewis-BeckMichael SStegmaierMary (2008) The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18(3): 303–323.
32.
MacKuenMichaelEriksonRobertStimsonJames (1992) Peasants or Bankers? the American electorate and the US economy. American Political Science Review86(3): 597–611.
33.
MangahasMahar (2009) The Role of Society in Poverty Monitoring: The Case of the Philippines. Paper presented for Conference on “The Impact of the Global Economic Situation on Poverty and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific,”28–30 September, Hanoi, Vietnam. Available at: http://www.sws.org.ph/Mangahas%20paper%20-%20Hanoi%202009%204th%20draft.pdf
34.
MainwaringScottTimothyScully (1995) Introduction: party systems in Latin America. In MainwaringScottScullyTimothy (eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
ManacsaRodelio CTanAlexander C (2005) Manufacturing Parties: re-examining the transient nature of Philippine political parties. Party Politics11(6): 748–765.
36.
ManuelPaul CReardonLawrenceWilcoxClyde (eds) (2006) The Catholic Church and the Nation-State: Comparative Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
37.
MaslowAbraham H (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review50(4): 370–396.
38.
MishlerWilliamWillertonJohn P (2003) The Dynamics of Presidential Popularity in Post-Communist Russia: cultural imperatives versus neo-institutional choice. Journal of Politics65(1): 111–141.
39.
MontinolaGabriella (1999) Parties and Accountability in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy10(1): 126–140.
40.
NEDA (National Economic Development Authority of the Philippines) (1986–2009) Quarterly Data on Unemployment Rate and GDP Growth Rates (National Level). Pasig City: NEDA.
O’DonnellGuillermo (1994) Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy (5)1: 55–69.
44.
PacekAlexander C (1994) Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe. American Journal of Political Science38(3): 723–744.
45.
Pérez-LiñánAnibal (2007) Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Philippine Population Commission (2001) State of the Philippine Population Report (SPPR). Manila: United Nations Population Fund.
47.
PindyckRobert SRubinfieldDaniel L (1998) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
48.
PowellG BinghamWhittenGuy D (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
49.
QuimpoNathan (2005) The Left, Elections and the Political Party System in the Philippines. Critical Asian Studies37(1): 3–28.
50.
RebullidaMaria Lourdes (2007) The Philippine executive and redemocratization. In MoradaNoelTademTeresa (eds) Philippine Politics and Governance: Challenges to Democratization and Development. Manila: University of the Philippines Press.
51.
RemmerKaren LGelineauFrancois (2003) Subnational Electoral Choice: economic and referendum voting in Argentina, 1983–1999. Comparative Political Studies36(7): 801–821.
52.
RiceRoberta (2012) The New Politics of Protest: Indigenous Mobilization in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
SchedlerAndreasDiamondLarryPlattnerMarc (1999) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
57.
SchmidtGD (2000) Delegative Democracy in Peru? Fujimori’s 1995 Landslide and the Prospects for 2000. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs42(1): 99–132.
58.
SenAmartyaNussbaumMartha (1993) The Quality of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
