This article compares how Portuguese voters and deputies evaluated the role of legislators and the representation process before and after the economic crisis (2008 and 2012, respectively). It makes use of a set of six issues characterising two views of representation: one institutional–independent and another participatory–mandatory. It also includes an analysis of two core policy issues. The research draws upon surveys of Portuguese voters and deputies carried out in 2008 and 2012. Findings reveal significant changes in the patterns of representation, a tendency for greater deputy–voter correspondence on the issues of representation, and lesser correspondence among government parties on core policy issues. Finally, voters’ views of representation seem equally significant when explaining levels of congruence both before and after the crisis.
AchenChristopher (1978) Measuring Representation. American Journal of Political Science22(3): 475–510.
2.
AndewegRudy (1997) Role Specialisation or Role Switching? Dutch MPs between electorate and executive. The Journal of Legislative Studies3(1): 110–127.
3.
BarberBenjamin (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
4.
BeethamDavid (1993) Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization. In HeldDavid (ed.) Prospects for Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 55–73.
5.
BelchiorAna Maria (2013) Explaining Left–Right Party Congruence across European Party Systems: A test of micro and macro level models. Comparative Political Studies46(3): 352– 386.
6.
BelchiorAna MariaFreireAndré (2013) Is Party Type Relevant to an Explanation of Policy Congruence? Catch-all versus ideological parties in the Portuguese case. International Political Science Review34(3): 273–288.
7.
BlythMark (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BonafontLaura ChaquésPalauAnna (2011) Assessing the Responsiveness of Spanish Policymakers to the Priorities of their Citizens. West European Politics34(4): 706–730.
Congruencia Ideológica entre Electores y Representantes Políticos (2012), Study n°2930, CIS - Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/index.html).
11.
ConversePhilipPierceRoy (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
12.
CooperJoseph (2013) The Modern Congress. In DoddLawrence COppenheimerBruce I (eds) Congress Reconsidered, 10th edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 401–436.
13.
DoddLawrenceOppenheimerBruce (2013) The Dynamics and Dysfunction of the Congressional Budget Process: From inception to deadlock. In DoddLawrenceOppenheimerBruce (eds) Congress Reconsidered (10th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 465–493.
14.
EriksonRobertMacKuenMichaelStimsonJames (2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
EsaiassonPeterHolmbergSören (1996) Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
16.
EulauHeinzWahlkeJohn CBuchananWilliamFergusonLeroy C (1959) The Role of the Representative: Some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review53(3): 742–756.
17.
European Parliament Election Study 2009, Candidate Study, Advance Release, July/2010, (www.piredeu.eu).
18.
GolderMattStramskiJacek (2010) Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science54(1): 90–106.
19.
GorjãoPaulo (2012) Portugal and the Straitjacket of the European Financial Crisis. The International Spectator47(4): 64–68.
20.
HeldDavid (1996) Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
HolmbergSören (2000) Issue Agreement. In EsaiassonPeterHeiderKnut (eds) Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 155–180.
22.
KangShin-GooPowellG. BinghamJr (2010) Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The median voters, election rules, and redistributive welfare spending. The Journal of Politics72(4): 1014–1028.
23.
LefkofridiZoeGigerNathalieKissauKathrin (2012) Inequality and Representation in Europe. Representation48(1): 1–11.
24.
Leston-BandeiraCristina (2012) Towards a Trustee Model? Parliamentary representation in the Internet era: The Portuguese case. Parliamentary Affairs65(2): 425–447.
25.
LopesFernando Farelo (2004) Os Partidos Políticos: Modelos e Realidades na Europa Ocidental e em Portugal. Lisbon: Celta.
26.
Members of the European Parliament (1996), Study no. 3078, University of Twente and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
27.
McAllisterIan (1991) Party Elites, Voters and Political Attitudes: Testing three explanations for mass-elite differences. Canadian Journal of Political Science24(2): 237–268.
28.
MagalhãesPedro (2004) Democratas, Descontentes e Desafectos: As atitudes dos portugueses em relação ao sistema político. In FreireAndréLoboMarina Costa (eds) Portugal a Votos: As Eleições Legislativas de 2002. Lisbon: ICS, 333–361.
29.
ManzaJeffLomax CookFay (2002) The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: The state of the debate. In ManzaJeffLomax CookFayPageBenjamin (eds) Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 17–32.
30.
MattilaMikkoRaunioTapio (2006) Cautious Voters, Supportive Parties: Opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics7(4): 427–449.
31.
MillerWarrenPierceRoyThomassenJacquesHerreraRichardHolmbergSörenEsaissonPeterWesselsBernhard (eds) (1999) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
MonastiriotisVassilisHardimanNiamhReganAidanGorettiChiaraLandiLucioConde-RuizJ. IgnacioMarínCarmenCabralRicardo (2013) Austerity Measures in Crisis Countries: Results and impact on mid-term development. Intereconomics Review of European Economic Policy48(1): 4–32.
33.
PierceRoy (1999) Mass-Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model of Representation. In MillerWarrenPierceRoyThomassenJacquesHerreraRichardHolmbergSörenEsaiassonPeterWesselsBernhard (eds), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 9–32.
34.
PitkinHanna (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and London: University of California Press.
35.
PonticelliJacopoVothHans-Joachim (2011) Austerity and Anarchy: Budget cuts and social unrest in Europe, 1919–2009, Discussion Paper no. 8513, Centre for Economic Policy Research, available at: www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP8513.asp.
PowellG BinghamJr (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
39.
Representación y Participación Política en España (2005), Study no. 2588, CIS - Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/index.html).
40.
RudderCatherine (2013) Tax Policymaking and Fiscal Responsibility: Is Congress capable of doing its job? In DoddLawrenceOppenheimerBruce (eds) Congress Reconsidered, 10th edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 347–375.
41.
RüdigWolfgangKaryotisGeorgios (2013) Who Protests in Greece? Mass opposition to austerity. British Journal of Political Science44(3): 487–513.
42.
SchmidtVivien (2009) Re-envisioning the European Union: Identity, democracy, economy. Journal of Common Market Studies47(1): 17–42.
43.
SchmittHermanThomassenJacques (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
SchumpeterJoseph (1996 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin.
45.
SorokaStuartWlezienChristopher (2005) Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science35: 665–689.
46.
StimsonJames (1995) Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review89(3): 543–565.
47.
TeixeiraConceição PequitoTsatsanisEmmanouilBelchiorAna Maria (2013) Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Times of Crisis: Voters’ assessments of democracy in Portugal before and after the bailout (2008–2012). Paper presented at the ECPR Conference, 5–7 September, Science Po, Bordeaux.
48.
ThomassenJacques (1994) Empirical Research into Political Representation: Failing democracy or failing models? In JenningsM KentMannThomas E (eds) Elections at Home and Abroad. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 237–264.
49.
ThomassenJacques (1999) Political Communication between Political Elites and Mass Publics: The role of belief systems. In MillerWarrenPierceRoyThomassenJacquesHerreraRichardHolmbergSörenEsaissonPeterWesselsBernhard (eds) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 33–58.
50.
ThomassenJacquesSchmittHerman (1999) Issue Congruence. In SchmittHermanThomassenJacques (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 186–208.
51.
ThurberJames (2013) The Dynamics and Dysfunction of the Congressional Budget Process: From inception to deadlock. In DoddLawrenceOppenheimerBruce (eds) Congress Reconsidered (10th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 319–345.
52.
ValenHenryNarudHanne (2007) The Conditional Party Mandate: A model for the study of mass and elite opinion patterns. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 293–318.
53.
VerneySusannahBoscoAnna (2013) Living Parallel Lives: Italy and Greece in an age of austerity. South European Society and Politics18(4): 397–426.
54.
WesselsBernhard (1999) System Characteristics Matter: Empirical evidence from 10 representation studies. In MillerWarrenPierceRoyThomassenJacquesHerreraRichardHolmbergSörenEsaissonPeterWesselsBernhard (eds) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 137–161.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
