It is a standard practice to include a Duty term in explanatory models of turnout. Yet the relationship between duty and voting is not that clear. Does duty really trigger voting or is it the reverse? To address this question, we present cross-lagged panel estimations of the impact of duty on turnout and of turnout on duty with two different datasets: a two-wave panel Canadian survey conducted in 2008 and 2009 and a four-wave Spanish panel conducted between 2010 and 2012. We find evidence that sense of civic duty is a true motivation that affects people’s propensity to vote, even though duty may be reinforced by the act of voting.
AjzenIcekFishbeinMartin (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
2.
AldrichJohn H (1993) Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science37(1): 246–278.
3.
BarryBrian(1970) Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.
4.
BatsonC Daniel (1975) Rational processing or rationalization? The effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32(1): 176–184.
5.
BemDaryl J (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological review74(3), 183.
6.
BendorJonathanDiermeierDanielTingMichael (2003) A behavioral model of turnout. American Political Science Review97(2): 261–280.
7.
BerringtonAnnSmithPeterSturgisPatrick (2006) An overview of methods for the analysis of panel data. Discussion Paper. N/A. Mimeo. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/415/.
8.
BlaisAndré (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
BlossfeldHans-PeterRohwerGötz (1997) Causal inference, time and observation plans in the social sciences. Quality and Quantity31(4): 361–384.
11.
BrownTimothy A (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford.
12.
BuiterWillem H (1984) Granger-causality and policy effectiveness. Economica51(202): 151–162.
13.
BurkholderGary JHarlowLisa L (2003) An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling10(3): 465–486.
14.
CampbellAngusGurinGeraldMillerWarren (1954) The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
15.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip EMillerWarren E. (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
16.
CampbellDavid E (2006) Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape our Civic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
CampbellDonald ThomasKennyDavid A (1999) A Primer on Regression Artefacts. New York: Gilford.
18.
ClarkeHarold DAcockAlan C (1989) National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy. British Journal of Political Science19(4): 551–562.
19.
ClarkeHarold DSandersDavidStewartMarianne C. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
ColemanJames S (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
DaltonRussell J (2008) The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation is Reshaping American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
22.
Delli CarpiniMichael XCookFay LomaxJacobsLawrence R (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science7: 315–344.
23.
DennisJack (1970) Support for the institution of elections by the mass public. The American Political Science Review64(3): 819–835.
24.
DowdingKeith (2005) Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations7(3): 442–459.
25.
DownsAnthony(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
26.
EastonDavidDennisJackEastonSylvia (1969) Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
EngelenBart (2006) Solving the paradox. The expressive rationality of the decision to vote. Rationality and Society18(4): 419–441.
28.
FinkelSteven E (1985) Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science29(4): 891–913.
29.
FinkelSteven E (1995) Causal Analysis with Panel Data (No. 105). Sage.
30.
FinkelSteven EMullerEdward N (1998) Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. American Political Science Review92(1): 37–49.
31.
FinkelSteven EMullerEdward NOppKarl-Dieter (1989) Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. The American Political Science Review83(3): 885–903.
32.
FiorinaMorris P (1976) The voting decision: Instrumental and expressive aspects. Journal of Politics38(2): 390–413.
33.
FiorinaMorris P (1989) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
FishkinJames S (1995) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
FowlerJames HKamCindy D (2007) Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. Journal of Politics69(3): 813–827.
36.
GastilJohnXenosMichael (2010) Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication60(2): 318–343.
37.
GerberAlan SGreenDonald PLarimerChristopher W (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review102(01): 33–48.
38.
GrofmanBernard (1993) Is turnout the paradox that ate rational choice theory? In: GrofmanBernard (ed.) Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
HoogheMarcQuintelierEllen (2013) Do all associations lead to lower levels of ethnocentrism? A two-year longitudinal test of the selection and adaptation model. Political Behavior35(2): 289–309.
41.
JonesPhilipHudsonJohn (2000) Civic duty and expressive voting: Is virtue its own reward?Kyklos53(1): 3–16.
42.
KanazawaSatoshi (1998) A possible solution to the paradox of voter turnout. The Journal of Politics60(04): 974–995.
43.
KennyDavid A (1975) Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin82(6): 887–903.
44.
KennyDavid AMcCoachD Betsy (2003) Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling10(3): 333–351.
45.
KnackStephenKropfMartha E (1998) For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting. Political Psychology19(3): 585–599.
46.
LeighleyJan (1991) Participation as a stimulus of political conceptualization. Journal of Politics53 (1): 198–211.
47.
LenzGabriel S (2009) Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science53(4): 821–837.
48.
LiskaAllen E (1974). Emergent issues in the attitude-behavior consistency controversy. American Sociological Review39(2): 261–272.
49.
LittleRoderick JARubinDonald B (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley.
50.
MacCallumRobert CBrowneMichael WSugawaraHazuki M (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods1(2): 130.
51.
MarkusGregory BConversePhilip E (1979) A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review73(4): 1055–1070.
52.
MarshDavid (1971) Political socialization: The implicit assumptions questioned. British Journal of Political Science1(4): 453–466.
53.
MarshHerbert WYeungAlexander Seeshing (1997) Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement – structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology89(1): 41–54.
54.
MatsusakaJohn GPaldaFilip (1999) Voter turnout: How much can we explain?Public Choice98(3–4): 431–446.
55.
MuellerDennis C (1989) Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
MuellerDennis C (2003) Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
OwenGuillermoGrofmanBernard (1984) To vote or not to vote: The paradox of nonvoting. Public Choice42(3): 311–325.
58.
PageBenjamin IJonesCalvin C (1979) Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review73(4): 1071–1089.
59.
RahnWendy MKrosnickJon ABreuningMarijke (1994) Rationalization and derivation processes in survey studies of political candidate evaluation. American Journal of Political Science38(3): 582–600.
60.
RaneyTraceyBerdahlLoleen (2009) Birds of a feather? Citizenship norms, group identity, and political participation in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science42(01): 187–209.
61.
RikerWilliam. HOrdeshookPeter C (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. The American Political Science Review62(1): 25–42.
62.
SarisWillem EAalbertsChris (2003) Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling10(2): 193–213.
63.
UhlanerCarole Jean (1986) Political participation, rational actors, and rationality. Political Psychology7(3): 551–573.
Van ElsasErika JLubbeRozemarijnvan der MeerTom WG. (2013) Vote recall: A panel study on the mechanisms that explain vote recall inconsistency. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Epub ahead of print October2013. DOI:10.1093/ijpor/edt031.
66.
VenterAnreMaxwellScott EBoligErika (2002) Power in randomized group comparisons: The value of adding a single intermediate time point to a traditional pretest–posttest design. Psychological Methods7(2): 194–209.
67.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
WeinschenkAaron C (2014) Personality Traits and the Sense of Civic Duty. American Politics Research42(1): 90–113.
69.
WileyDavid EWileyJames A (1970) The estimation of measurement error in panel data. American Sociological Review35(1): 112–117.
70.
WileyJames AWileyMary G (1974) A note on correlated errors in repeated measurements. Sociological Methods & Research3(2): 172–188.
71.
WolfingerRaymond ERosenstoneSteven (1980). Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
