Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The article addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (2005–2007), the analysis shows that global public support for UN authority largely depends on a cosmopolitan understanding of global interdependence and moral universalism. However, the analysis of contextual variables also suggests that a “particularist” calculus of national costs and benefits explains citizens’ support for (and rejection of) UN authority to a significant extent. Most remarkably, citizens of powerful states favor UN authority much more than do those from weaker countries – a possible indication that UN authority is expected to further privilege the former to the disadvantage of the latter.
AldrichJohn HSullivanJohn LBorgidaEugene (1989) Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates “waltz before a blind audience?”American Political Science Review83(1): 123–141.
2.
ArchibugiDaniele (2004) Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review. European Journal of International Relations10(3): 437–473.
3.
BaldwinDavid A (1980) Interdependence and power. A conceptual analysis. International Organization34(4): 471–506.
4.
BarnettMichael NDuvallRaymond (2005) Power in International Politics. International Organization59(3): 39–75.
5.
BeethamDavid (1991) The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
6.
BeitzCharles R (1979) Bounded morality: Justice and the state in world politics. International Organization33(3): 410–416.
7.
BennerThorstenMergenthalerStephanRotmannPhilipp (2011) The New World of UN Peace Operations. Learning to Build Peace?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
CabreraLuis (2004) Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. London: Routledge.
9.
CalhounCraig (2003) The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travellers: Towards a Critique of Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism. In ArchibugiDaniele (ed) Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso, 86–116.
10.
CooperScottHawkinsDarren GJacobyWade. (2008) Yielding sovereignty to international institutions: Bringing system structure back in. International Studies Review10(3): 501–524.
11.
della PortaDonatella (2007) The Global Justice Movement: Cross-national and Transnational Perspectives. Boulder: Paradigm.
12.
DellmuthLisa MTallbergJonas (2011) The social legitimacy of international organizations: Interest representation, institutional performance and cosmopolitan ideas. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, September 1, 2011.
13.
DuffieldMichael (2005) Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.
14.
Ecker-EhrhardtMatthias (2010) Aid organizations, governments and the media: The critical role of journalists in signaling authority recognition. In Koch-BaumgartenSigridVoltmerKatrin (eds) Public Policy and the Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making. London: Routledge, 106–123.
15.
Ecker-EhrhardtMatthias (2012) Cosmopolitan politicization? Relating public perceptions of interdependence and expectations in internationalized governance. European Journal of International Relations18(3): 481–508.
16.
EichenbergRichard CDaltonRussell J (1993) Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization47(4): 507–534.
17.
FloriniAnn (2005) The Coming Democracy. New Rules for Running a New World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
18.
FuriaPeter A (2005) Global citizenship, anyone? Cosmopolitanism, privilege and public opinion. Global Society19(4): 331–359.
19.
GiddensAnthony (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
GlennJohn (2008) Global Governance and the Democratic Deficit: stifling the voice of the South. Third World Quarterly29(2): 217–238.
21.
GravelleTimothy (2011) Global public opinion toward the United Nations: Insights from the Gallup World Poll. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, Montréal, September 16, 2011.
22.
GriecoJoseph M (1997) Realist international theory and the study of world politics. In DoyleMichael WIkenberryG John (eds) New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 163–201.
23.
HabermasJürgen (1998) Jenseits des Nationalstaates? Bemerkungen zu Folgeproblemen der wirtschaftlichen Globalisierung. In BeckUlrich (ed) Politik der Globalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 67–84.
24.
HeldDavid (1995) Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitical Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
HeldDavid (2002) Law of States, Law of People: Three Models of Sovereignty. Legal Theory8(1): 1–44.
26.
HolstiOle R (1992) Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. International Studies Quarterly36(4): 439–466.
27.
HoogheLisbethMarksGary (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
28.
InglehartRonald (1970) Public opinion and regional integration. International Organization24(4): 764–795.
29.
KeohaneRobert ONyeJoseph S (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
30.
Koenig-ArchibugiMathias (2004) Explaining government preferences for institutional change in EU foreign and security policy. International Organization58(1): 137–174.
31.
KrasnerStephan D (1991) Global communications and national power. Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics43(3): 336–366.
32.
LinklaterAndrew (2007) Distant suffering and cosmopolitan obligations. International Politics44(1): 19–36.
33.
LuCatherine (2000) The one and many faces of cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy8(2): 244–267.
34.
MachidaSatoshi (2009) Globalization and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. International Studies46(4): 371–400.
35.
MillardWilliam J (1993) International public opinion of the United Nations: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research5(1): 92–99.
36.
MoynihanDaniel P (1978) A Dangerous Place. Boston: Little, Brown.
37.
NorrisNorris (2000) Global Governance and Cosmopolitan Citizens. In NyeJoseph SKamarckElaine (eds) Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington D.C.: Brookings, 155–177.
O‘NeillOnora (2000) Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PhilpottDavid (1999) Westphalia, Authority, and International Society. Political Studies47(3): 566–589.
41.
PoggeThomas (2002) Moral universalism and global economic justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics1(1): 29–58.
42.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders (2012): Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, Volume II, ƒ3rd Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
43.
SchmitterPhilippe C (1969) Three neo-functionalist hypotheses about international integration. International Organization23(1): 161–166.
44.
WeßelsBernhard (1995) Evaluations of the EC: Elite or mass-driven? In NiedermayerOskarSinnottRichard (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–162.
45.
ZaumDominik (2006) The Authority of International Administrations in International Society. Review of International Studies32(3): 455–473.
46.
ZürnMichaelBinderMartinEcker-EhrhardtMatthias (2012) International authority and its politicization. International Theory4(1): 69–106.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
