This study considers the problem of suicide terrorism, government counterterror responses, and the mobilization of recruits in support of the contending parties. A model is developed that enables predictions as to what factors should be emphasized or de-emphasized by the forces protecting society. The article presents a linear mathematical analysis of the logical interrelationships involved in the confrontation and embeds the study within the framework of previous mathematical and empirical work on the subject. It is concluded that governments should avoid inflicting collateral damage on the general population in counterterrorist activities and should pursue policies (both in counterterrorist operations and otherwise) that contribute to the political quiescence of the populace.
ArbesmanSamuelKleinbergJon M.StrogatzSteven H. (2009) Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. Physical Review79: 016115–1–016115–5.
2.
ArceM.DanielG.SandlerTodd (2005) Counterterrorism: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(2): 183–200.
3.
AsadTalal (2007) On Suicide Bombing. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
BenmelechEfraimBerrebiClaudeKlorEsteban F. (2012) Economic conditions and the quality of suicide terrorism. Journal of Politics74(1): 113–128.
5.
BiddleStephenFriedmanJeffrey A.ShapiroJacob N. (2012) Testing the surge: Why did violence decline in Iraq in 2007?International Security37(1): 7–40.
6.
BiggsMichael (2005) Dying without killing: Self-immolations, 1963–2002. In: GambettaDiego (ed.) Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.173–208.
7.
BloomMia (2004) Palestinian suicide bombing: Public support, market share, and outbidding. Political Science Quarterly119(1): 61–88.
8.
BloomMia (2005) Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaEthan (2005) The quality of terror. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 515–530.
10.
Bueno de MesquitaEthan (2008) Terrorist factions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science3(3): 399–418.
11.
Bueno de MesquitaEthanDicksonEric S. (2007) The propaganda of the deed: Terrorism, counterterrorism, and mobilization. American Journal of Political Science51(2): 364–381.
12.
ClausetAaronYoungMaxwellGleditschKristian Skrede (2007) On the frequency of severe terrorist events. Journal of Conflict Resolution51(1): 58–87.
13.
ClausetAaronYoungMaxwellGleditschKristian Skrede (2010) A novel explanation of the power-law form of the frequency of severe terrorist events: Reply to Saperstein. Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy16(1): Article 12.
14.
CondraLuke N.ShapiroJacob N. (2012) Who takes the blame? The strategic effects of collateral damage. American Journal of Political Science56(1): 167–187.
EllsbergDaniel (1970) Revolutionary Judo: Working Notes on Vietnam No. 10. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation (declassified October2005).
17.
EndersWalterSandlerTodd (1993) The effectiveness of antiterrorism policies: A vector-autoregression-intervention analysis. American Political Science Review87(4): 829–844.
18.
FerreroMario (2006) Martyrdom contracts. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6): 855–877.
19.
GambettaDiego (2005a) Can we make sense of suicide missions? In: GambettaDiego (ed.) Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.259–299.
20.
GambettaDiego (2005b) Forward. In: GambettaDiego (ed.) Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.v-x.
21.
GoodwinJeff (2006) What do we really know about (suicide) terrorism?Sociological Forum21(2): 315–330.
22.
KalyvasStathisSanchez-CuencaIgnacio (2005) Killing without dying: The absence of suicide missions. In: GambettaDiego (ed.) Making Sense of Suicide Missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.209–232.
23.
KyddAndrewWalterBarbara F. (2006) The strategies of terrorism. International Security31(1): 49–80.
24.
LanchesterFrederick W. (1914) Aircraft in warfare: The dawn of the fourth arm – no. V, the principle of concentration. Engineering98: 422–423.
PapeRobert A. (2003) The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review97(3): 343–361.
27.
PapeRobert A. (2005) Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.
28.
PapeRobert A.FeldmanJames K. (2010) Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop It. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
PowellRobert (2007) Defending against terrorist attacks with limited resources. American Political Science Review101(3): 527–541.
31.
RosendorffB. PeterSandlerTodd (2004) Too much of a good thing? The proactive response dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(5): 657–671.
32.
SapersteinAlvin M. (2008) Mathematical modeling of the interaction between terrorism and counterterrorism and its policy implications. Complexity14(1): 45–49.
33.
SapersteinAlvin M. (2010a) A mathematical model of suicide terrorism. In: GalloreAdrienne M. (ed.) Terrorism: Motivation, Threats and Prevention. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp.181–187.
34.
SapersteinAlvin M. (2010b) A comment on the power-law relation between frequency and severity of terrorist attacks. Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy16(1): Article 7.
35.
SiqueiraKevinSandlerTodd (2006) Terrorists versus the government: Strategic interaction, support, and sponsorship. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6): 878–898.
36.
ThayerBradley A.HudsonValerie M. (2010) Sex and the Shaheed: Insights from the life sciences on Islamic suicide terrorism. International Security34(4): 37–62.
37.
ValentinoBenjaminHuthPaulBalch-LindsayDylan (2004) ‘Draining the sea:’ Mass killing and guerrilla warfare. International Organization58(2): 375–407.
38.
WrightQuincy ([1942] 1964) A Study of War (abridged edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
ZhukovYuri M. (2013) An epidemic model of violence and public support in civil war. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(1): 24–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
