We report empirical results related to trust and trustworthiness based on a representative web survey carried out in March 2011 in Japan. Although it initially was intended as a pilot, our survey is unique and unrepeatable because the massive Tohoku earthquake that hit Japan in spring 2011 occurred during the data-collection process and created a natural experiment. Apart from exploring changes originated by the disaster, the novelty of our approach lies in using a multipurpose questionnaire assembled by researchers with diverse interests from different academic areas that allows for exploring political and other social correlates of the economic concepts of trust and trustworthiness as measured by the game-theoretical trust game.
BacharachMichaelGambettaDiego (2001) Trust in signs. In: CookK (ed.) Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 148–84.
6.
BardsleyNicholasCubittRobinLoomesGrahan. (2009) Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BellemareCharlesKrögerSabine (2007) On representative social capital. European Economic Review51: 183–202.
8.
BelotM MichèleMillerLuisDuchRaymond (2010) Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games, Mimeo. University of Oxford.
9.
BergJoyceDickhautJohnMcCabeKevin (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior10: 122–42.
10.
BowlesSamuel (2004) Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions and Evolution. New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
11.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbert (2002) Social capital and community governance. Economic Journal112: F419–36.
12.
CamererColin (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CampbellAngus (1962) Recent developments in survey studies of political behavior. In: RanneyA (ed.) Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
CampbellAngus (1966) Recherche comparée sur la psychologie du votes. Revue Française de Sociologie7: 579–97.
15.
CampbellAngusConversePhillipMillerWarren. (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
16.
CapraMónicaLanierKelliMeerShireen (2008) Attitudinal and behavioral measures of trust: A new comparison, Mimeo. Emory University.
17.
CassarAlessandroHealyAndrewVon KesslerCarl (2011) Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: Experimental evidence from Thailand, Mimeo.
18.
CavalloEduardoNoyIlian (2011) Natural disasters and the economy – A survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics5: 63–102.
19.
ChaudhuriAnanish (2009) Experiments in Economics: Playing Fair with Money. New York: Routledge.
20.
ChongAlbertoFlemingDavidBejaranoHernán (2011) ‘Trust and trustworthiness in the aftermath of natural disasters: Experimental evidence from the 2010 Chilean earthquake’, Mimeo. Institute for International Economic Policy.
21.
ConversePhilip (1969) Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies2: 139–71.
22.
De AllesiLouis (1975) Towards an analysis of postdisaster cooperation. American Economic Review65: 127–38.
23.
DiamondJaredRobinsonJames (2010) Natural Experiments of History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
24.
DohmenThomasArminFalkHuffmanDavid. (2008) Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants. Economic Inquiry46: 84–90.
25.
DoreRon (1958) City Life in Japan: A study of a Tokyo Ward. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
DownsAnthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
27.
DrabekThomas (1986) Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
DruckmanJamesGreenDonaldKuklinskiJames. (2011) Experiments: An introduction to core concepts. In: DruckmanJGreenDKuklinskiJ. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
EllisPaul (2010) The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
EriksonKai (1994) A New Species of Trouble: The Human Experience of Modern Disasters. New York: Norton.
31.
ErmischJohnGambettaDiego (2006) People’s trust: The design of a survey-based experiment, Mimeo. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
32.
ErmischJohnGambettaDiegoLaurieHeather. (2009) Measuring people’s trust. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society172: 749–69.
33.
FafchampsMarcel (2006) Development and social capital. Journal of Development Studies42: 1180–98.
34.
FedákováDenisaKentošMichalVýrostJozef (2007) The impact of natural disaster on opinion and attitudes of ESS Round 2 respondents in Slovakia, Mimeo. Košice Institute of Social Sciences.
35.
FehrErnest (2009) On the economics and biology of trust. Journal of the European Economic Association7: 235–66.
36.
FehrErnestFischbacherUrsVon RosenbladtBernhard. (2003) A nation-wide laboratory: Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioral experiments into representative surveys, Mimeo. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
37.
FischerHenry (1998) Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction and its Perpetuation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
38.
FukuyamaFrancis (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
39.
GlaeserEdwardLaibsonDavidScheinkmanJosé. (2000) Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics115: 811–46.
40.
HinoAiroTanakaAiji (2013) Yoronchosa no atarashi chihei: CASI hoshiki yoronchosa [New Horizons of Public Opinion Research: The CASI Method]. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.
41.
JohnsonNoelMislinAlexandra (2011) Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology32: 865–89.
42.
JohnsonNoelMislinAlexandra (2012) How much should we trust the World Value Survey trust questions?Economics Letters116: 210–12.
43.
KatzRichard (1979) The dimensionality of party identification: Cross-national perspectives. Comparative Politics10: 147–63.
44.
La PortaRafaelLopez de SilanesFlorencioShleiferAndrei. (1997) Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review87: 333–8.
45.
MiyakeIchiro (1985) Seito-shiji no Bunseki [Analysis of Partisanship]. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.
46.
MiyakeIchiro (1998) Seito-shiji no Kozo [Structure of Partisanship]. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.
47.
NakagawaYukoShawRajib (2004) Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters22: 5–34.
48.
PutnamRobert (1993) The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect13: 35–42.
49.
RichardsonBradley (1974) Political Culture of Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
50.
RichardsonBradleyFlanaganScott (1984) Politics in Japan. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
51.
RubinsteinAriel (2007) Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. Economic Journal117: 1243–59.
52.
SnidermanPaul (2011) The logic and design of the survey experiments: An autobiography of a methodological innovation. In: DruckmanJGreenDKuklinskiJ. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SweetStephen (1998) The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters16: 321–31.
54.
TierneyKathleenBevcChristineKuligowskiErica (2006) Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in hurricane Katrina. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604: 57–81.
55.
WatanukiJoji (1967) Patterns of politics in present-day Japan. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
56.
WatanukiJoji (1991) Social structure and voting behavior. In: FlanaganS (ed.) The Japanese Voter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
WeisbergHerbert (1980) A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior2: 33–60.
58.
WeisbergHerbertKrosnickJonBowenBruce (1996) An Introduction to Survey, Research, Polling, and Data Analysis, 3rd edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
WilsonRickEckelChaterine (2011) Trust and social exchange. In: DruckmanJGreenDKuklinskiJ. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
YamagishiToshioYamagishiMidori (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion18: 129–66.
ZakPaulKnackStephen (2001) Trust and growth. Economic Journal111: 295–321.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
