There are many explanations for variation in political protest. However, they have not focused sufficiently on institutions and the influence the latter exert on protest. This article, by using multilevel analysis and cross-national survey data, suggests that political protest depends on the level of institutional decentralization. In fact, decentralization increases the number of state actors, implies a multiplication of access points to the political system, and provides greater chances of influencing the decision-making process. Furthermore, it is shown that the effect of mobilizing agencies, such as political parties and trade unions, also depends on the level of decentralization.
AndersonCJ (2007) Structures and voter behavior. In: DaltonRJKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 589–609.
2.
ArmingeonKLeimgruberPBeyelerM. (2008) Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2006. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
3.
BarnesSHKaaseM (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
BensonMRochonTR (2004) Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies37(4): 435–57.
5.
CoffèHBolzendhalC (2010) Same game, different roles? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles62(5-6): 318–33.
6.
DahlRATufteER (1973) Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
DaltonRJ (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DaltonRJ (2008) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Chatham: Chatham House.
9.
DaltonRJVan SickleA (2005) The roots of political protest: A contextual analysis of protest behavior. In: Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, USA, March2005.
10.
DaltonRJVan SickleAWeldonS (2010) The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science40(1): 51–73.
11.
Della PortaDDianiM (2006) Social Movements: An Introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
EfronBTibshiraniR (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall and CRC.
13.
European Value Study (2008) European Values Study Integrated Data File, 2008, v., 2008 2.0.0. File Producers: ASEP/JDS, Madrid, Spain and Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. File Distributors: ASEP/JDS and GESIS, Köln, Germany.
14.
FangY (2011) Asymptotic equivalence between cross-validation and Akaike Information Criteria in mixed-effects models. Journal of Data Science9(1): 15–21.
15.
FinkelSEOppK-D (1991) Party identification and participation in collective action. Journal of Politics53(2): 339–371.
16.
FoxJ (2008) Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. London: Sage.
17.
GelmanAHillJ (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (1950–2006). London: Routledge.
19.
InglehartR (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
InglehartR (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
InglehartRWezelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
IngramPClayK (2000) The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26: 525–46.
23.
KaaseM (1989) Appendix C: The cumulativeness and dimensionality of the participation scales. In: JenningsKMVan DethJWBarnesSH. (eds) Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Orientations in Three Western Democracies. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, pp. 393–6.
24.
KaaseM (1999) Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics22(3): 1–21.
25.
KaaseMMarshA (1979a) Political action: A theoretical perspective. In: BarnesSHKaaseM (eds) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 27–56.
26.
KaaseMMarshA (1979b) Political action repertory: Changes over time and a new typology. In: BarnesSHKaaseM (eds) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 137–66.
27.
KermanJGelmanA (2007) Manipulating and summarizing posterior simulation using random variable objects. Statistics and Computing17(3): 235–44.
28.
KitscheltHP (1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science16(1): 57–86.
29.
KoopmansR (1996) New social movements and changes in political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics19(1): 28–50.
30.
KriesiH-PWestholmA (2007) Small-scale democracy: The determinants of action. In: Van DethJWMonteroJRWestholmA (eds) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 255–79.
31.
KriesiH-PKoopmansRDuyvendakJW. (1995) New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: UCL Press.
32.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
34.
McAdamD (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology92(1): 64–90.
35.
MarksGHoogheLSchakelAH (2008a) Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies18(2–3): 111–21.
36.
MarksGHoogheLSchakelAH (2008b) Operationalizing regional authority: A coding scheme for 42 countries, 1950–2006. Regional and Federal Studies18(2–3): 123–42.
37.
MarshAKaaseM (1979) Measuring political action. In: BarnesSHKaaseM (eds) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 57–97.
38.
MeyerDS (2004) Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology30: 125–45.
39.
MeyerDSMinkoffDC (2004) Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces82(4): 1457–92.
40.
MokkenRJ (1971) A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter.
41.
MoralesL (2009) Joining Political Organisations. Colchester: ECPR Press.
42.
MorlinoL (2011) Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
NorrisP (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
NorrisP (2008) Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
NorthD (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: WW Norton.
46.
OliverJE (1999) City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America. American Political Science Review94(2): 361–73.
47.
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
OppK-D (1989) The Rationality of Political Protest: A Comparative Analysis of Rational Choice Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
49.
ParryGMoyserGDayN (1992) Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
PatemanC (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
PollockPHIII (1982) Organizations as agents of mobilization: How does group activity affect participation?American Journal of Political Science26(3): 485–503.
52.
PrzeworskiA (1974) Contextual models of political behavior. Political Methodology1(1): 27–61.
53.
PrzeworksiATeuneH (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
54.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55.
RadcliffBDavisP (2000) Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies. American Journal of Political Science44(1): 132–41.
56.
RaghunathanTELepkowskiJMVan HoewykJ. (2001) A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology27(1): 85–95.
57.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
RemmerKL (2010) Political scale and electoral turnout: Evidence from the less industrialized world. Comparative Political Studies43(3): 275–303.
59.
RobertsKJFanX (2004) Bootstrapping within the multilevel/hierarchical linear modeling framework: A primer for use with SAS and SPLUS. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints30(1): 23–34.
60.
RosenstoneSJHansenJM (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
61.
RubinDB (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
62.
ScarrowSE (2000) Party without members? Party organizations in a changing electoral environment. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–101.
63.
SchakelAH (2008) Validation of the regional authority index. Regional and Federal Studies18(2–3): 143–66.
64.
ScharpfF (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
65.
SchneiderA (2003) Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development38(3): 32–56.
66.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
67.
TaageperaR (2003) Arendt Lijphart’s dimensions of democracy: Logical connections and institutional design. Political Studies51(1): 1–19.
68.
TanAC (1998) The impacts of party membership size: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics60(1): 188–98.
69.
TarrowS (1998) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd edn.New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
TeorellJSamanniMHolmbergS. (2011) The Quality of Government Dataset, version 6 Apr11. Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. Available at: http://www.qog.pol.gu.se (accessed 20 December 2011).
71.
TeorellJTorcalMMonteroJR (2007) Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In: Van DethJMonteroJRWestholmA (eds) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 334–57.
72.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
73.
TillyC (2002) Stories, Identities, and Political Change. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
UNDP (2004) Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World. New York: UNDP.
76.
Van der MeerTWGGrotenhuisMTScheepersPLH (2009) Three types of voluntary associations in comparative perspective: The importance of studying associational involvement through a typology of associations in 21 European countries. Journal of Civil Society5(3): 227–41.
77.
Van SchuurWH (2003) Mokken Scale Analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and parametric Item Response Theory. Political Analysis11(2): 139–63.
78.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
79.
VerbaSNieNHKimJ-O (1978) Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyH (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
WeldonS (2006) Downsize my polity? The impact of size on party membership and member activism. Party Politics12(4): 467–81.
82.
WhiteleyPSeydP (2002) High Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
83.
WilsonJQ (1973) Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
