Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In examining post-communist countries, it becomes apparent that civil society is durable in certain countries and fragile in others. One then asks: What factors contribute to this condition? Many of the theorists in the post-communist literature argue that socioeconomic factors and the communist legacy have weakened post-communist civil society. The article explores the following question: Has corruption replaced the legacy of communism as a factor undermining trust in others and government? The theory proposed in this article implies a break from previous studies on the weakness of post-communist civil society, arguing that corruption has been a major factor in undermining civil society in the region. The article presents a rigorous examination of the association between corruption and post-communist civil society by focusing on the impact of political corruption on trust and, hence, post-communist civil society.

Keywords

corruption post-communist civil society interpersonal trust trust in government

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Tverdova

(2003) Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes towards government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 91–109.

Badescu

Sum

Uslaner

(2004) Civil society development and democratic values in Romania and Moldova. East European Politics and Societies 18(2): 316–41.

Baron

Kenny

(1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–82.

Chang

ECC

Chu

Y-H

(2006) Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies. Journal of Politics 68(2): 259–71.

Diamond

(1999) Developing Democracy Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Howard

(2002) The weakness of post-communist civil societies. Journal of Democracy 13(1): 157–69.

Inglehart

(1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Culture, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kopecky

(2003). Uncivil Society?: Contentious politics in post-communist Europe (Vol. 1). Routledge.

La Porta

Lopez-De Silanes

Shleifer

. (1997) Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 137(2): 333–8.

10.

Lambsdorff

(2008). The Methodology of the TI Corruption Perception Index 2008. Transparency International and University of Passau.

11.

Mishler

Rose

(1997) Trust, distrust, and skepticism: Problem evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics 59(2): 418–51.

12.

Mishler

Rose

(2001) Trust and honesty in post-socialist societies. International Review for Social Science 54: 415–44.

13.

Morris

Klesner

(2010) Corruption and trust: Theoretical consideration and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 1258–85.

14.

Putnam

(1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

15.

Rothstein

Eek

(2009) Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society 21(1): 81–112.

16.

Rothstein

Uslaner

(2005). All for one: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics 58(1): 41–72.

17.

Sandholtz

Koetzle

(2000) Accounting for corruption, economic structure, democracy and trade. International Studies Quarterly 44(1): 31–51.

18.

Smolar

(1996) From opposition to atomization. Journal of Democracy 7(1): 24–38.

19.

Wheaton

Kavan

(1992) The Velvet Revolution: Czechoslovakia, 1988–1991. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Is corruption an enemy of civil society? The case of Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References