This article explores institutional and other factors facilitating the substantive representation of women in parliament. It engages with a range of indicators of substantive representation, including process/responsiveness indicators, legislative/policy outcomes and attitudinal alignment of women representatives and women in the community. It presents an Australian case study of a successful initiative by a cross-party group of women parliamentarians to facilitate access to the abortion drug RU486. It finds that critical mass, critical actors and a critical juncture were important but so was institution-building, particularly the under-studied role of parliamentary groups.
AllisonL (2006) Second Reading Speech, Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of RU486) Bill 2005, Parliament of Australia, Senate Hansard, 8February, pp. 93–96.
3.
ARHA (Australian Reproductive Health Alliance) and RCA (Reproductive Choice Australia) (2006) RU486/Mifepristone: A Factual Guide to the Issue in the Australian Debate. Canberra: RHA & RCA.
4.
AuSSA (Australian Survey of Social Attitudes) (2003) Australian Survey of Social Attitudes. Australian Social Science Data Archives, ANU. Available at: http://assda.anu.edu.au
5.
BettsK (2004) Attitudes to abortion in Australia: 1972 to 2003. People and Place12(4): 22–28.
6.
CampbellRChildsSLovenduskiJ (2009) Do women need women representatives?British Journal of Political Science40: 171–194.
7.
CannoldL (2002) Understanding and responding to anti-choice women-centred strategies. Reproductive Health Matters10(19): 171–179.
8.
CarrollSJ (2002) Have women legislators in the United States become more conservative? A comparison of State legislators in 2001 and 1988. Atlantis27(2): 128–139.
9.
CelisKChildsS (eds) (2008) The political representation of women. Parliamentary Affairs61(3): 419–534.
ChildsS (2004) New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.
12.
ChildsSKrookML (2009) Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition44(2): 125–145.
13.
CostaMSawerMSharpR (2011) Women acting for women: The case of gender-responsive finance in Timor-Leste. Paper presented to the Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Canberra, 26–28September. Available at: http://law.anu.edu/coast/events/apsa/papers.htm
14.
CurtinJ (2008) Women, political leadership and substantive representation. Parliamentary Affairs61(3): 490–504.
15.
DahlerupD (1988) From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Politics Studies11: 275–297.
16.
DahlerupD (2006) The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics and Gender2(4): 511–522.
17.
de CostaC (2005) Medical abortion for Australian women – it’s time. Medical Journal of Australia183(7): 378–380.
18.
de CostaC (2007) RU-486: The Abortion Pill. Salisbury, SA: Boolarong Press.
19.
DodsonLPeatlingS (2006) Win gives scope for parliamentary sisterhood. Sydney Morning Herald, 18February, p. 6.
20.
DoviS (2002) Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black or Latino do?American Political Science Review96(4): 729–743.
21.
FarrMRehnA (2006) Women back abortion pill: Abbott’s fury over Senate rebellion. Daily Telegraph, 10February, p. 1.
22.
GithensM (2003) Accounting for women’s political involvement: The perennial problem of recruitment. In: CarrollSJ (ed.) Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–52.
23.
GonzalezKSampleK (2010) One Size Does Not Fit All: Lessons Learned from Legislative Gender Commissions and Caucuses. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
24.
GraceJ (2011) Parliament with a purpose: Holding the Canadian government accountable to women. Paper presented at the Second European Conference on Politics and Gender, Central European University, Budapest, 13–15 January.
25.
GreySSawerM (2005) Australia and New Zealand. In: GalliganYTremblayM (eds) Sharing Power: Women, Parliament, Democracy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 171–187.
26.
HaussmanM (2001) Of rights and power: Canada’s federal abortion policy 1969–91. In: StetsonDM (ed.) Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–86.
27.
HolliAMKantolaJ (2005) A politics for presence: State feminism, women’s movements and political representation in Finland. In: LovenduskiJ (ed.) State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–84.
28.
IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union) (2007) The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Mainstreaming Gender and Promoting the Status of Women. Geneva: IPU.
29.
KanterRM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
KöplR (2001) State feminism and policy debates on abortion in Austria. In: StetsonDM (ed.) Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–38.
31.
KrookMLMackayF (eds) (2011) Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
LijphartA (1999) Australian democracy: Modifying majoritarianism? In SawerMMiskinS (eds) Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Australian Senate. Canberra: Department of the Senate, 55–70.
33.
MackayF (2006) Descriptive and substantive representation in new parliamentary spaces: The case of Scotland. In: SawerMTremblayMTrimbleL (eds) Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge, 171–187.
34.
MackayF (2008) ‘Thick’ conceptions of substantive representation: Women, gender and political institutions. Representation44(2): 125–139.
35.
MackayF (2009) Institutionalising ‘new politics’ in post devolution Scotland: ‘Nested newness’ and the gendered limits of change. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Manchester, 7–9 April. Available at: http://www.psa.ac.uk/2009/pps/Mackay.pdf
36.
MaddoxM (2005) God under Howard: The Rise of the Religious Right in Australian Politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
37.
PiscopoJM (2011) Committed to changing gender policy: Female elites’ caucus formation and advocacy work in Mexico. Paper presented at the Second European Conference on Politics and Gender, Central European University, Budapest, 13–15 January.
38.
Register of Parliamentary Friendship Groups for the 43rd Parliament (2011) Parliament of Australia. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Friendship.htm
39.
RoseM (2011) Pro-life, pro-woman? Frame extension in the American anti-abortion movement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy32: 1–27.
40.
SawerM (2000) Parliamentary representation of women: From discourses of justice to strategies of accountability. International Political Science Review21(4): 361–380.
41.
SawerM (2006) When women support women …: EMILY’s List and the substantive representation of women. In: SawerMTremblayMTrimbleL (eds) Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge, 103–119.
42.
SawerMTremblayMTrimbleL (eds) (2006) Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.
SummersA (2003) The End of Equality: Work, Babies and Women’s Choices in 21st Century Australia. Sydney: Random House.
45.
SummersA (2006) You go girls. Sydney Morning Herald, 18February, p. 34.
46.
TremblayM (1998) Do female MPs substantively represent women? A study of legislative behaviour in Canada’s 35th parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science31(3): 435–465.
47.
WarhurstJ (2007) Religion and politics in the Howard decade. Australian Journal of Political Science42(1): 19–32.
48.
WaylenG (2008) Enhancing the substantive representation of women: Lessons from transitions to democracy. Parliamentary Affairs61(3): 518.
