Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article argues that IR researchers concerned with the causation of state behaviour need an approach that posits a human agent as an important analytical category in its own right, thereby treating the specific factor (i.e. political beliefs) of human agents as an end in itself. In order to provide a check on the plausibility of this cognitive-individualist thesis, the article undertakes an in-depth study of a case that constitutes a tough test for that thesis. In addition, a further testing of the argument for the power of human political beliefs over the state’s external behaviour proceeds through a case comparison analysis.

Keywords

foreign policy political beliefs political psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADFAT (Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) (2001) An Australia–United States free trade agreement – issues and implications. Available at: http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/aus_us_fta_mon/Chapter2.pdf (accessed 13 December 2010).

ADFAT (2003) Advancing the national interest: Foreign and trade policy white paper. Available at: http://www.dfat.gov.au/ani/dfat_white_paper.pdf (accessed 14 December 2010).

Ayres

(1987) Malcolm Fraser: A Biography. Melbourne: William Heinemann.

Barber

(1972) The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barns

(2003) What’s Wrong with the Liberal Party? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brenchley

(1999) The Howard defence doctrine. The Bulletin 28: 22–24.

Brooks

Wohlforth

(2002) American primacy in perspective. Foreign Affairs 81: 20–33.

Brooks

Wohlforth

(2008) World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Browning

(2006) Small, smart and salient? Rethinking identity in the small states literature. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19: 669–684.

10.

Campbell

(2009) American power preponderance and the nuclear revolution. Review of International Studies 35: 27–44.

11.

CHEONG WA DAE, The Office of President (2003) Biography of the 16th President of Republic of Korea (in Korean). Available at: http://16cwd.pa.go.kr/cwd/en/pub/president/cnt02030101.html (accessed 20 November 2010).

12.

Choi

Schott

(2001) Free Trade between Korea and the United States? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

13.

Choi

(2007) HangookDaetongryong Leadership ChongRhon [A Comprehensive Analysis of Korean Presidents and Leadership]. Seoul. Bummoonsa (in Korean).

14.

Debats

McDonald

Williams

M-A

(2007) Mr Howard goes to Washington: September 11, the Australian–American relationship and attributes of leadership. Australian Journal of Political Science 42: 231–251.

15.

De Castella

McGarty

Musgrove

(2009) Fear appeals in political rhetoric about terrorism: An analysis of speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard. Political Psychology 30: 1–26.

16.

de Rivera

(1968) The Psychological Dimension of Foreign Policy. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

17.

Dibb

(2003) Australia’s alliance with America. Melbourne Asia Policy Paper 1: 1–16.

18.

Eckstein

(1975) Case study and theory in political science. In: Greenstein

Polsby

(eds) Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 79–137.

19.

Elman

(1995) The foreign policies of small states: Challenging neorealism in its own backyard. British Journal of Political Science 25: 171–217.

20.

Franck

(2003) What happens now? The United Nations after Iraq. The American Journal of International Law 97: 607–620.

21.

French

(2002a) Candidates in South Korea differ sharply on the North. The New York Times, 4 December, 9.

22.

French

(2002b) Seoul may loosen its ties to the U.S. The New York Times, 20 December, 11.

23.

French

(2003) South Korea’s President-Elect rejects use of force against North Korea. The New York Times, 17 January, 17.

24.

Garran

(2004) True Believer: John Howard, George Bush and the American Alliance. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

25.

George

(1969) The ‘operational code’: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making. International Studies Quarterly 13: 190–222.

26.

George

(1979) The causal nexus between cognitive beliefs and decision-making behavior: The operational code belief system. In: Falkoswki

(ed.) Psychological Models in International Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 95–124.

27.

George

Bennett

(2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

28.

Gyngell

(2003) National obsession with change belies our position. Australian Financial Review 25: 63–84.

29.

Handel

(1981) Weak States in the International System. London: Frank Cass.

30.

Henderson

(1998) Menzies’ Child: The Liberal Party of Australia. Australia: Allen & Unwin.

31.

Hermann

Preston

Korany

Shaw

(2001) Who leads matters: The effects of powerful individuals. International Studies Review 3: 83–131.

32.

Herrmann

(1985) Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.

33.

Hirshberg

(1993) Perpetuating Patriotic Perceptions: The Cognitive Function of the Cold War. Westport, CT: Praeger.

34.

Holsti

(1962) The belief system and national images: A case study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 6: 608–617.

35.

Hong

(2005) The impact of NGOs on South Korea’s decision to dispatch troops to Iraq. Journal of International and Area Studies 12: 31–46.

36.

Hopf

(2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

37.

Howard

(1995) The role of government: A modern liberal approach. Headland Speech to the Menzies Research Centre, 6 June. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

38.

Howard

(1998) Speech to National Press Club. 1 October. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

39.

Howard

(2001a) Press conference. Australian Embassy, Washington DC, 12 September. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

40.

Howard

(2001b) Interview with John Laws, Radio 2UE. 12 September. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

41.

Howard

(2001c) Interview with Mike Munro, a current affair. 12 September. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

42.

Howard

(2003) Joint press conference with President George W. Bush. Crawford, Texas, 3 May. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

43.

Howard

(2004a) Address to the National Marriage Forum. 4 August. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

44.

Howard

(2004b) Press release: Prime Minister John Howard and Prime Minister Tony Blair. London, 5 June. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

45.

Howard

(2004c) Interview with Neil Mitchell, Radio 3AW. Melbourne, 2 July. PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive. Canberra: National Library of Australia.

46.

Hudson

(2007) Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

47.

Ikenberry

Mastanduno

Wohlforth

(2009) Unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. World Politics 61: 1–27.

48.

Jervis

(1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

49.

Johnson

(2007) John Howard’s ‘values’ and Australian identity. Australian Journal of Political Science 42: 195–209.

50.

Kaarbo

(2003) Foreign policy analysis in the twenty-first century: Back to comparison, forward to identity and ideas. International Studies Review 5: 155–163.

51.

Kaarbo

Beasley

(1999) A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political science. Political Psychology 20: 369–391.

52.

Keohane

(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

53.

Keohane

Nye

(1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.

54.

Kevin

(2004) Australia’s secret pre-emptive war against Iraq, 18–20 March 2003. Australian Journal of International Affairs 58: 318–336.

55.

Kim

(2005) The Roh Moo Hyun government’s policy toward North Korea. Politics, Governance, Security Series 11: 1–28.

56.

Kim

J-h

(2003) “A public survey of Kyunghyang and Hyundai Research regarding Iraq War’, Kyunghyang Shinmun, 17 November, p. 1.

57.

Kim

S-h

(2003) Anti-American sentiment and the ROK–US Alliance. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 15: 105–130.

58.

Kim

(2004) Controversy over Korean troop dispatch to Iraq. Korean Observations on Foreign Relations 6: 152–160.

59.

King

Keohane

Verba

(1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

60.

Labs

(1992) Do weak states bandwagon? Security Studies 1: 383–416.

61.

Larson

(1994) The role of belief systems and schemas in foreign policy decision-making. Political Psychology 15: 17–33.

62.

Lee

(2003) Whither South Korea? President-elect Roh’s dubious foreign policy posture. National Interest 2. Available at: http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=18198 (accessed 1 March 2010).

63.

Lee

G-w

(2006) South Korea’s Faustian attitude: The Republic of Korea’s decision to send troops to Iraq revisited. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19: 481–493.

64.

Levy

(2004) What do great powers balance against and when? In: Paul

Wirtz

Fortmann

(eds) Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 29–51.

65.

Levy

Thompson

(2005) Hegemonic threats and great-power balancing in Europe, 1495–1999. Security Studies 14: 1–30.

66.

Little

(1991) Varieties of Social Explanation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

67.

Malici

Aand

Malici

(2005) “The operational codes of Fidel Castro and Kim II Sung: The last cold warriors?,” Political Psychology 26, pp. 387–412.

68.

Manyin

(2006) CRS Report for Congress: South Korea–U.S. Economic Relations. Washington, DC: The Library of US Congress.

69.

Marfleet

(2000) The operational code of John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis: A comparison of public and private rhetoric. Political Psychology 21: 545–558.

70.

McPhail

(2007) John Howard’s Leadership of Australian Foreign Policy 1996 to 2004: East Timor and the war against Iraq. PhD dissertation, Griffith University.

71.

Megalogenis

(2002) Interview with John Howard. The Australian, 5 May. Available at: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,4264645,00.html (accessed 22 February 2010).

72.

Mill

(1973 [1843]) A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

73.

Milner

(1992) International theories of cooperation among nations: Strengths and weaknesses. World Politics 44: 466–496.

74.

Miyagi

(2009) Foreign policy making under Koizumi: Norms and Japan’s role in the 2003 Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis 5: 349–366.

75.

Neack

(2003) The New Foreign Policy: U.S. and Comparative Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

76.

O’Brien

(1985) The Liberals: Factions, Feuds and Fancies. Melbourne: Viking Penguin.

77.

Papayoanou

(1996) Interdependence, institutions, and the balance-of-power: Britain, Germany, and World War I. International Security 20: 42–76.

78.

Paul

(1994) Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

79.

Posen

(2003) Command of the commons: The military foundations of U.S. hegemony. International Security 28: 5–46.

80.

Rittberger

(2004) Approaches to the study of foreign policy derived from international relations theories. Peace and Conflict Studies 46: 1–29.

81.

Roh

M-h

(2003a) Roh supports US campaign in Iraq. 20 March. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks (in Korean). Seoul: The Office of President.

82.

Roh

M-h

(2003b) Roh gives guidelines for forming Korean military unit to be sent to Iraq. 13 November. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks. Seoul: The Office of President.

83.

Roh

M-h

(2003c) Roh tries to soften opposition to troop dispatch. 26 March. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks (in Korean). Seoul: The Office of President.

84.

Roh

M-h

(2003d) Speech by President Roh Moo-hyun at the graduation ceremony of the Korea Third Military Academy. 22 March. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks. Seoul: CHEONG WA DAE, The Office of President.

85.

Roh

M-h

(2004) Address at the University of Paris IV, the Sorbonne Paris, France. 6 December. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks (in Korean). Seoul: The Office of President.

86.

Roh

M-h

(2005a) Hearing from the President. 26 August. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks. Seoul: The Office of President.

87.

Roh

M-h

(2005b) Determined for independent military power. 20 May. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President’s Latest Thoughts. Seoul: The Office of President.

88.

Roh

M-h

(2006a) South Korea–U.S. relations, friends living independently. 3 May. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks. Seoul: The Office of President.

89.

Roh

M-h

(2006b) Special lecture at the Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry. 28 March. CHEONG WA DAE’s Briefings: President Speeches and Remarks. Seoul: The Office of President.

90.

Rosati

(1987) The Carter Administration’s Quest for Global Community: Beliefs and Their Impact on Behavior. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

91.

Rosati

(2000) The power of human cognition in the study of world politics. International Studies Review 43: 45–75.

92.

Rose

(1998) Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51: 144–172.

93.

Rosenau

(1966) Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In Farrell

(ed.) Approaches in Comparative and International Politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 27–92.

94.

Sartori

(1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review 64: 1033–1053.

95.

Simon

(1985) Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.

96.

Snyder

(1991) Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

97.

Snyder

Bruck

CHW

Sapin

(eds) (1962) Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

98.

South Korean National Assembly (2003) Records of the 243rd Unification, Foreign Affairs and Trade Committee Meeting. 17 September. Seoul: National Assembly Secretariat (in Korean).

99.

Spaeth

(2003) Roh Moo Hyun takes center stage. TIME, 17 February. Available at: http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501030224/roh.html (accessed 8 October 2009).

100.

Steinbruner

(1974) The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

101.

Sung

H-y

(2008) Dasi Grigo Hamggye: Sungchal. Hankyoreh, 4 February (in Korean). Available at: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/SERIES/170/267754.html (accessed 11 September 2010).

102.

Tang

(2009) Taking stock of neoclassical realism. International Studies Review 11: 799–803.

103.

Walker

Schafer

Young

(2003) “Profiling the operational codes of political leaders,” in Post

Jerrold M.

ed. The psychological assessment of political leaders. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: pp. 215–45.

104.

Waltz

(1979) Theory of International Politics. New York, NY: Random House.

105.

Waltz

(2000) Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security 25: 5–41.

106.

Weisman

(2003) South Korea, once a solid ally, now poses problems for the U.S. The New York Times, 2 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/02/international/asia/02DIPL.html (accessed 8 October 2010).

107.

Wendt

(1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

108.

Winn

GFT

(1976) Korean Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Process and Structure. Honolulu: Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii.

109.

Winter

Stewart

(1977) Content analysis as a technique for assessing political leaders In: Hermann

(ed.) A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York, NY: Free Press, pp. 27–61.

110.

Wohlforth

(1999) The stability of a unipolar world. International Security 24: 5–41.

111.

Wohlforth

. (2007) Testing balance-of-power theory in world history. European Journal of International Relations 13: 155–185.

112.

Wright

(2003) The road to war. The Bulletin, 8 April, 29–37.

113.

Yetiv

(2004) Explaining Foreign Policy: U.S. Decision-Making and the Persian Gulf War. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Press.

114.

Yin

(2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods Fourth Edition. Sage Publications.

115.

Yoon

Y-k

(2009) Interview. Seoul, South Korea, 15 June.

116.

Young

Schafer

(1998) Is there method in our madness? Ways of assessing cognition in international relations. Mershon International Studies Review 42: 63–96.

117.

Zhou

(2007) Security strategy: An analysis of weak states’ foreign policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 12 April.

The power of human beliefs over the state’s behaviour in world politics: An in-depth and comparative case study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References