This study asserts that cohesionary — rather than diversionary — motives primarily influence the propensity of political leaders to use external force in international crises in times of domestic turmoil. Specifically, I contend that mass violence leads political leaders to engage in cohesionary tactics to achieve and maintain social order in their country for political survival. Employing random effects probit analyses with International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data for 139 countries from 1918 to 2005, I find that increased mass violence is more likely than other forms of domestic problems (be it an economic downturn or government instability) to instigate the external use of force during international crises. I also find that the impact of mass violence on the external use of force is contingent on ethno-religious heterogeneity and regime type.
Adamson FB ( 2001) Democratization and the domestic sources of foreign policy: Turkey in the 1974 Cyprus crisis. Political Science Quarterly116(2): 277-303.
2.
Alter P. ( 1994) Nationalism. London: Edward Arnold.
3.
Andreski S. ( 1980) On the peaceful disposition of military dictatorships . Journal of Strategic Studies3(1): 3-10.
4.
Baum MA ( 2002) The constituent foundations of the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly46(2): 263-98.
5.
Brecher M. and Wilkenfeld J. ( 2000) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Bremer SA ( 1992) Dangerous dyads: conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(2): 309-41.
7.
Brown D. ( 2000) Contemporary Nationalism: Civic, Ethnocultural and Multicultural Politics. London: Routledge.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita B. ( 1980) Theories of international conflict: an analysis and an appraisal. In: Gurr TR (ed.) Handbook of Political Conflict. New York: Free Press, 361-98.
9.
Bueno de Mesquita B. and Lalman D. ( 1992) War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Chiozza G. and Goemans HE ( 2003) Peace through insecurity: tenure and international conflict . Journal of Conflict Resolution47(4): 443-67.
11.
Clark DH ( 2003) Can strategic interaction divert diversionary behavior? A model of U.S. conflict propensity. Journal of Politics65(4): 1013-39.
12.
Coser LA ( 1956) The Function of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
13.
Davies GA ( 2002) Domestic strife and the initiation of international conflicts . Journal of Conflict Resolution46(5): 672-92.
14.
DeRouen KR Jr ( 1995) The indirect link: politics, the economy, and the use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution39(4): 671-95.
15.
DeRouen KR Jr and Goldfinch S. ( 2005) Putting the numbers to work: implications for violence prevention. Journal of Peace Research42(1): 27-45.
16.
DeRouen KR Jr and Sprecher C. ( 2004) Initial crisis reaction and poliheuristic theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(1): 56-68.
17.
Ellingsen T. ( 2000) Colorful community or ethnic witches’ brew? Multiethnicity and domestic conflict during and after the cold war. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(2): 228-49.
18.
Fearon JD and Laitin DD ( 2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75-90.
19.
Festinger L., Schachter S. and Black KW ( 1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper .
20.
Friedkin NE ( 2004) Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology30: 409-25.
21.
Geller D. ( 2000) Explaining war: empirical patterns and theoretical mechanisms . In: Midlarsky MI (ed.) Handbook of War Studies II. Ann Arbor, MI: University Michigan Press, 407-49.
22.
Gelpi C. ( 1997) Domestic diversions: governmental structure and the externalization of domestic conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(2): 255-82.
23.
Grimes JE and Grimes BF ( 1996) Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
24.
Gujarati DN ( 2003) Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Gumusbas Y. ( 1974) Dun sabah gunes daha onurlu dogdu (Yesterday morning the sun rose with more dignity). Cumhuriyet, 21 July.
26.
Habermas J. ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Henderson EA ( 1997) Culture or contiguity: ethnic conflict, the similarity of states, and the onset of war, 1820-1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(5): 649-68.
28.
Hewitt JJ and Wilkenfeld J. ( 1999) One-sided crisis in the international system. Journal of Peace Research36(3): 309-23.
29.
Ignatieff M. ( 1993) Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism . New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux .
30.
Ipperciel D. ( 2007) Constitutional democracy and civic nationalism. Nations and Nationalism13(3): 395-416.
31.
Kymlicka W. ( 2001) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Lai B. and Slater D. ( 2006) Institutions of the offensive: domestic sources of dispute initiation in authoritarian regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 113-26.
33.
Lebow RN ( 1981) Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crises . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Leeds BA and Davis DR ( 1997) Domestic political vulnerability and international disputes . Journal of Conflict Resolution41(6): 814-34.
35.
Levy J. and Vakili LI ( 1992) Diversionary action by authoritarian regimes: Argentina in the Falklands/Malvinas case. In: Midlarsky MI (ed.) The Internationalization of Communal Strife. New York: Routledge, 118-46.
36.
Lian B. and Oneal JR ( 1993) Presidents, the use of military force and public opinion . Journal of Conflict Resolution37(2): 277-300.
37.
Meernik J. and Waterman P. ( 1996) The myth of the diversionary use of force byAmerican presidents. Political Research Quarterly49(3): 573-90.
38.
Miller RA ( 1995) Domestic structures and the diversionary use of force . American Journal of Political Science39(3): 760-85.
39.
Morgan TC and Anderson CJ ( 1999) Domestic support and diversionary external conflict in Great Britain, 1950-1992. Journal of Politics61(3): 799-814.
40.
Morgan TC and Bickers KN ( 1992) Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(1): 25-52.
41.
Mueller JE ( 1973) War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
42.
Oneal JR and Tir J. ( 2006) Does the diversionary use of force threaten the democratic peace? Assessing the effect of economic growth on interstate conflict, 1921-2001 . International Studies Quarterly50(4): 755-79.
43.
Ostrom CW and Job B. ( 1986) The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review80(2): 541-66.
44.
Pickering J. and Kisangani EF ( 2005) democracy and diversionary military intervention: reassessing regime type and the diversionary hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly49(1): 23-44.
45.
Prins BC ( 2005) Interstate rivalry and the recurrence of crises: a comparison of rival and nonrival crisis behavior, 1918-1994. Armed Forces and Society31(3): 323-51.
46.
Richards D., Morgan TC, Schwebach V. and Young GD ( 1993) Good times, bad times, and the diversionary use of force: a tale of some not-so-free agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution37(3): 504-35.
47.
Rosecrance RN ( 1963) Action and Reaction in World Politics. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
48.
Russet BM ( 1987) Economic change as a cause of international conflict. In: Blackaby F and Schmidt C (eds) Peace, Defense, and Economic Analysis. London: Macmillan.
49.
Russett BM ( 1990) Economic decline, electoral pressure and the initiation of interstate conflict. In: Gochman CS and Sabrosky AN (eds) Prisoners of War? Nation States in the Modern Era. New York: Lexington Books, 123-40.
50.
Shulman S. ( 2002) Challenging the civic/ethnic and west/east dichotomies in the study of nationalism. Comparative Political Studies35(5): 554-85.
51.
Simmel G. ( 1955) Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
52.
Singer JD ( 1988) Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816-1985. International Interactions14(2): 115-32.
53.
Smith A. ( 1996) Diversionary foreign policy in democratic systems. International Studies Quarterly40(1): 133-53.
54.
Smith AD ( 1991) National Identity. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
55.
Sobek D. ( 2007) Rallying around the podesta: testing diversionary theory across time. Journal of Peace Research44(1): 29-45.
56.
Sprecher C. and DeRouen KR Jr ( 2002) Israeli military actions and internalization-externalization processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(2): 244-59.
57.
Stein AA ( 1976) Conflict and cohesion: a review of the literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution20(1): 143-72.
58.
Stohl MS ( 1980) The nexus of civil and international conflict. In: Gurr TR (ed.) Handbook of Political Conflict. New York: Free Press297-330.
59.
Tarar A. ( 2006) Diversionary incentives and the bargaining approach to war. International Studies Quarterly50(1): 169-88.
60.
The New York Times (1974) For Turks going to war: cheers and watermelon. 22 July.
61.
Trumbore PF and Boyer MA ( 2000) International crisis decision-making as a two-level process . Journal of Peace Research37(6): 679-97.
62.
Vanhanen T. ( 1999) Domestic ethnic conflict and ethnic nepotism. Journal of Peace Research36(1): 55-79.
63.
Vasquez JA ( 1993) The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Waltz K. ( 1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
65.
Wendt A. ( 1994) Collective identity formation and the international state . American Political Science Review88(2): 384-96.
