Drawing on recent research in the United Kingdom and the Canadian province of British Columbia, this article focuses on the politics of electoral reform:the strategic maneuvering by political elites to prevent and facilitate change. Through a comparative analysis of two highly majoritarian polities in which dominant executives have, since 1997, adopted contrasting reform trajectories, the article suggests that previous analyses of this topic have underemphasized the role of political agency and ideational change. In order to demonstrate this argument, the article develops and refines a process-based approach by embedding it within a framework that recognizes the interplay between context, agency, and structure. Not only does this approach deepen our understanding of executive veto points, majoritarian modification, and aversive constitutionalism, but it also sensitizes scholars to the role and power of political cultures and dominant ideologies.
Archer, Margaret ( 1995). Realist Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bhaskar, Roy ( 1989). Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso.
3.
Blais, André, ed. (2008). To Keep or Change First Past the Post?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Blaney, Jack ( 2004). "Opening Speech - BC Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform," January 10, URL: http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/public/extra/blaney_speech.xml .
5.
Blau, Adrian ( 2004). "A Quadruple Whammy for First-Past-the-Post," Electoral Studies23(3): 431-53.
6.
Carty, Kenneth, Blais, André, and Fournier, Patrick (2008). "When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP," in André Blais (ed.), To Keep or Change First Past the Post?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Cm. 4090 (1998). The Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System. London : HMSO.
8.
Cm. 7170 (2007). The Governance of Britain. London: HMSO.
9.
Cm. 7304 (2008). Review of Voting Systems. London: HMSO.
10.
Cm. 7342 (2008). The Governance of Britain: Constitutional Renewal. London: HMSO.
11.
Dunleavy, Patrick ( 2005). "Facing up to Multi-party Politics," Parliamentary Affairs58(3): 503-32.
12.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen ( 1995). "Understanding the Dynamics of Electoral Reform," International Political Science Review16(1): 9-29.
13.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen ( 2001). "From Majoritarian to Pluralist Democracy?" Journal of Theoretical Politics13(3): 295-319.
14.
Eckstein, Harry ( 1980). "Theoretical Approaches to Explaining Collective Political Violence," in Ted Gurr (ed.), The Handbook of Political Violence. New York: Free Press.
15.
Erdos, David ( 2007). "Aversive Constitutionalism in the Westminster World ," International Journal of Constitutional Law5(2): 343-69.
16.
Finer, Sammy ( 1975). Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform. London: Anthony Wigram.
17.
Finkel, J. ( 2004). "Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change," Latin American Research Review39(3): 56-80.
18.
Finkel, J. ( 2005). "Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy," Latin American Politics and Society46(4): 87-113.
19.
Flinders, Matthew ( 2002). "Shifting the Balance?" Political Studies50(1): 23-42.
20.
Flinders, Matthew ( 2004). "Majoritarian Democracy in United Kingdom?" West European Politics28(1): 62-94.
21.
Flinders, Matthew ( 2009). Democratic Drift. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Flinders, Matthew and Curry, Dion ( 2008). "Bi-Constitutionalism," Parliamentary Affairs61(1): 99-121.
23.
Gamble, Andrew ( 1990). "Theories of British Politics," Political Studies38: 404-20.
24.
Gibson, Gordon ( 2002). Report on the Constitution of the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Victoria, BC: Ministry of the Attorney General.
25.
Goodin, Bob and Tilly, Charles , eds (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend, eds (1986). Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
27.
Howe, Paul and Northrup, David ( 2000). Strengthening Canadian Democracy. Montreal: IRPP.
28.
Inglehart, Ronald ( 1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Kelso, Alix ( 2009). "Parliament on Its Knees,"Political Quarterly80(3): 329-338.
30.
King, Anthony ( 2007). The British Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Judge, David ( 1993). The Parliamentary State. London: Sage Publications.
32.
Judge, David ( 2006). "This Is What Democracy Looks Like," British Politics1(3): 23-45.
33.
Lijphart, Arend ( 1984). Democracies. London: Yale University Press.
34.
Lijphart, Arend ( 1999). Patterns of Democracy. London: Yale University Press.
35.
Lijphart, Arend ( 2008). Thinking about Democracy. London: Routledge.
36.
Lijphart, Arend and Grofman, Bernard, eds (1984). Choosing an Electoral System. New York: Praeger.
37.
Marquand, David ( 2008). "The Strange Career of British Democracy," Political Quarterly79(4): 466-75.
38.
Marsh, Dave and Savigny, Heather ( 2004). "Political Science as a Broad Church," Politics24(3): 155-68.
39.
Palmer, Geoffrey ( 1979). Unbridled Power?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Palmer, Geoffrey ( 2004). Bridled Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert ( 2000). Disaffected Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Rae, Douglas ( 1971). The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Rosenberg, Sean, ed. (2008). Can the People Govern?London: Palgrave.
44.
Sakamoto, Takayuki ( 1999). "Explaining Electoral Reform," Party Politics5(4): 419-38.
45.
Sharman, Campbell ( 2007). "Electoral Reform as a Proxy for Constitutional Change ." Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Working Paper2007:2, University of British Columbia, Canada.
46.
Shugart, Matthew ( 2008). "Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems," in André Blais (ed.), To Keep or Change First Past the Post?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin, eds (2001). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
Siaroff, Alan ( 2003). "Spurious Majorities, Electoral Systems and Electoral System Change," Commonwealth and Comparative Politics41(2): 143-60.
49.
Tsebelis, George ( 1990). Nested Games. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
Vowles, Jack ( 1995). "The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand," International Political Science Review16: 95-115.
51.
Yin, Robert ( 2003). Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Zines, Leslie ( 1991). Constitutional Change in the Commonwealth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
