This article reconsiders the argument that civil society promotes democracy. Both the independent variable of civil society and the dependent variable of democracy are disentangled. Several hypotheses on what characteristics of civil society organizations (CSOs) promote what aspects of democracy are tested using survey data including 500 CSOs in post-communist Latvia. The regression analysis shows that organizational characteristics (such as the field of activity, extent of political activities, and number of members) have a stronger effect on democracy than have relational characteristics (such as the degree of open recruitment and autonomy). Certain characteristics of CSOs can be supportive of some democratic functions but constitute obstacles to other aspects of democracy. It is possible to distinguish between an advocacy civil society, which is vital for the institutional aspects of democracy through performing the functions of interest articulation and checking state power, and a recreational civil society, which may strengthen democracy through the fostering of support for democratic values and increasing individual capacity for political participation.
Armony, Ariel C. (2004). The Dubious Link: Civic Engagement and Democratization . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Beetham, David (1993). "Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization ," in David Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West. Cambridge : Polity Press.
3.
Brysk, Alison (2000). "Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America ," Journal of Democracy11(3): 151-65.
4.
Chambers, Simone and Kopstein, Jeffrey (2001). "Bad Civil Society," Political Theory29(6): 837-65.
5.
Chandhoke, Neera (2004). "The `Civil' and the `Political' in Civil Society: The Case of India," in Peter Burnell and Peter Calvert (eds), Civil Society in Democratization. London: Frank Cass.
6.
Diamond, Larry (1994). "Toward Democratic Consolidation," Journal of Democracy5(3): 4-17.
7.
Diamond, Larry (1999). Developing Democracy toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Ehin, Piret (2007). "Political Support in the Baltic States, 1993-2004 ," Journal of Baltic Studies38(1): 1-20.
9.
Encarnación, Omar G. (2001). "Civil Society and Consolidation of Democracy in Spain," Political Science Quarterly116(1): 53-79.
10.
Foley, Michael W. and Edwards, Bob (1996). "The Paradox of Civil Society ," Journal of Democracy7(3): 38-52.
11.
Haddad, Mary Alice (2006). "Civic Responsibility and Patterns of Voluntary Participation around the World," Comparative Political Studies39(10): 1220-42.
12.
Hadenius, Axel and Uggla, Fredrik (1996). "Making Civil Society Work, Promoting Democratic Development: What Can States and Donors Do?" World Development24(10): 1621-39.
13.
Howard, Marc Morjé (2003). The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Hydén, Göran (1997). "Building Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium ," in John Burbidge (ed.), Beyond Prince and Merchant: Citizen Participation and the Rise of Civil Society . New York: Pact Publications.
15.
Ikstens, Jãnis (2007). "Latvia," European Journal of Political Research46: 1012-18.
16.
Jubulis, Mark A. (2001). Nationalism and Democratic Transition: The Politics of Citizenship and Language in Post-Soviet Latvia. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
17.
Karklins, Rasma and Zepa, Brigita (2001). "Political Participation in Latvia 1987-2001," Journal of Baltic Studies32(4): 334-46.
18.
Kopecký, Petr and Mudde, Cas (2003). "Rethinking Civil Society," Democratization10(3): 1-14.
19.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1993). "Applied Regression: An Introduction," in Michael S. Lewis-Beck (ed.), Regression Analysis, International Handbooks of Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Volume 2. London: Sage.
20.
Li, Xiaorong (1999). "Democracy and Uncivil Societies: A Critique of Civil Society Determinism," in Robert K. Fullinwider (ed.), Civil Society, Democracy, and Civic Renewal. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
21.
Lindén, Tove (2008). Explaining Civil Society Core Activism in Post-Soviet Latvia. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Political Science.
22.
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
Newton, Kenneth (1997). "Social Capital and Democracy," American Behavioral Scientist40(5): 575-87.
24.
Ostrowska, Ilze (1997). "The Developing Civil Society: Peculiarities in Latvia," in R. Hjerppe, T. Kanninnen, H. Patomäki , and K. Sehm (eds), Democracy, Economy and Civil Society in Transition: The Cases of Russia and the Baltic States. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs, UPI, and the National Research and Development Center of Welfare and Health, STAKES.
25.
Pabriks, Artis (2003). "Ethnic Limits of Civil Society: The Case of Latvia ," in Norbert Götz and Jörg Hackmann (eds), Civil Society in the Baltic Sea Region. Aldershot: Ashgate .
26.
Paxton, Pamela (2002). "Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship," American Sociological Review67: 254-77.
27.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Putnam, Robert (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. London: Simon and Schuster .
29.
Salamon, Lester M., Sokolowski, S. Wojciech, and List, Regina (2004). "Global Civil Society: An Overview," in Lester M. Salamon, S. Wojciech Sokolowski, and associates (eds), Global Civil Society, Volume 2: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
30.
Tusalem, Rollin F. (2007). "A Boon or a Bane? The Role of Civil Society in Third- and Fourth-Wave Democracies," International Political Science Review28(3): 361-86.
31.
Uhlin, A.nders (2006). Post-Soviet Civil Society: Democratization in Russia and the Baltic States. London and New York: Routledge.
32.
Vilka, Inga and Strupiss, Aigars (2004). "The Development of Civil Society in Latvia: An Analysis." Riga: Secretariat of the Minister for Special Assignments for Society Integration Affairs.
33.
Waisman, Carlos H. (2006). "Autonomy, Self-Regulation, and Democracy: Tocquevillean-Gellnerian Perspectives on Civil Society and the Bifurcated State in Latin America," in Richard Feinberg, Carlos H. Waisman, and Leon Zamosc (eds), Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
Warren, Mark E. (2001). Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
White, Gordon (2004). "Civil Society, Democratization and Development: Clearing the Analytical Ground," in Peter Burnell and Peter Calvert (eds), Civil Society in Democratization. London: Frank Cass.
36.
Whitehead, Laurence (2002). Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Zepa, Brigita, ed. (1999). Conditions of Enhancement of Civic Participation. Riga: Baltic Data House.
