Recent findings by Inglehart and Welzel indicate that emancipative mass attitudes show a significantly positive effect on subsequent democracy, controlling for previous democracy and a number of socio-structural and socioeconomic factors. However, on an important theoretical point these prior findings remain inconclusive: the causal mechanism of why and how emancipative mass attitudes favor democracy. This article specifies such a mechanism, arguing that emancipative attitudes motivate mass actions that demonstrate people's willingness to struggle for democratic achievements, be it to establish democracy when it is denied or to defend it when it is challenged. Based on World Values Surveys rounds two to four, the empirical analyses strongly confirm these hypotheses, supporting what has recently been introduced as an “emancipative theory of democracy.”
Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000). “Political Trust and Trustworthiness,” Annual Review of Political Science3: 475—507.
20.
Lipset, S.M. (1959). “Some Social Requisites of Democracy,” American Political Science Review53, March: 69—105.
21.
Marshall, M.G. and Jaggers, K. (2000). “Polity IV Project (Data Users Manual).” University of Maryland.
22.
Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2001). “Political Support for Incomplete Democracies ,” International Political Science Review22(4): 303—20.
23.
Muller, E.N. and Seligson, M.A. (1994). “Civic Culture and Democracy,” American Political Science Review88(3): 635—52.
24.
Newton, K. (2001). “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy,” International Political Science Review22(2): 201—14.
25.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Political Activism Worldwide . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Paxton, P. (2002). “Social Capital and Democracy,” American Sociological Review67, April: 254—77.
27.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001). “Trust and Honesty in Post-Socialist Societies ,” Kyklos54: 415—44.
30.
Schwartz, S. (1992). “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values,” in M.P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Seligson, M. (2002). “The Renaissance of Political Culture or the Renaissance of the Ecological Fallacy,” Comparative Politics34, April: 273—92.
32.
Shin, D.C. (1994). “On the Third Wave of Democratization,” World Politics47: 135—70.
33.
Shin, D.C. and Wells, J. (2005). “Is Democracy the Only Game in Town?” Journal of Democracy16(2): 88—101.
34.
Teorell, J. and Hadenius, A. (2006). “Democracy Without Values,” Studies in Comparative International Development41(3): 95—105.
35.
Uslaner, E. (2001). “Producing and Consuming Trust,” Political Science Quarterly115: 569—90.
36.
Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries . London: Routledge.
37.
Vanhanen, T. (2003). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.
38.
Welzel, C. (2006). “Democratization as an Emancipative Process ,” European Journal of Political Research45(4): 871—96.
39.
Welzel, C. and Inglehart, R. (2006). “Emancipative Values and Democracy,” Studies in Comparative International Development41(3): 74—94.
40.
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H.D. (2003). “The Theory of Human Development,” European Journal of Political Research42(2): 341—80.
