In the 1980s, the Andean region appeared to be implementing the recipe for success: market reforms plus democratic opening. However, the dream unraveled. This article describes the malaise regarding democracy that has enveloped the region and connects it with neoliberal adjustments. On the one hand, it claims that the expectation that economic and political liberalism buttress each other naturally is wrong. On the other, it shows that there is no direct relation between democratic vulnerability and neoliberalism. Instead, the global forces behind neoliberal programs simultaneously block exit from democracy and the possibility of articulating voice within it – which explains the proliferation of “semi-democratic” forces and forms of governance.
Barometro (2004). El Comercio, URL: http://www.elcomercioperu.com.pe/ecdein/html/politi/Barometroabril2004.
2.
Conaghan, Catherine and Malloy, James (1994). Unsettling Statecraft: Democracy and Neoliberalism in the Central Andes. Pittsburg, PA and London: University of Pittsburg Press .
3.
Corporacion Escenarios de Colombia (2003). “Gobernabilidad en America Latina 1996–2002,” URL: http://www.cmeal.org/samper.doc.
4.
Costafreda, Andrea (2003). “Cuanta pobreza tolera la democracia?” URL: http://www.iigov.org/dhial. Instituto Internacional de Gobernabilidad.
5.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins .
6.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2002). Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2001–2002. URL: http://www.eclac.cl/DE/proyectos/eee/eee2002/index.htm.
7.
Gonzalez, Efrain (1998). El neoliberalismo a la peruana. Economia politica del ajuste estructural (1990–1997). Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
8.
Gutiérrez, Francisco (2003). “La radicalización del voto en Colombia,” in Gary Hoskin, Rodolfo Masías and Miguel García (eds), Colombia 2002. Elecciones, comportamiento electoral y democracia. Bogotá: Uniandes-Fundación Konrad Adenauer, Registraduría Nacional, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
9.
Heritage Foundation (2002). URL: http://cf.heritage.org/index2004.
10.
Hey, Jeanne and Klak, Thomas (1999). “From Protectionism Towards Neoliberalism: Ecuador Across Four Administrations (1981–1996),”Studies in International Comparative Development34(3): 66–98 .
11.
Hirschman, Albert (1977). Salida, voz y lealtad. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
12.
Hough, Jerry (1996). “The Lebed Factor in a Turbulent Nation.”The Los Angeles Times, October 23. URL: http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/Views/Op-Ed/Hough/19961023.htm.
13.
Huntington, Samuel (1992). “How Countries Democratize,”Political Science Quarterly106(4): 579–616 .
14.
Isaacs, Anita (1993). Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador: 1972–1992. London: Macmillan .
15.
Kelly, Janet (2000). “Thoughts on the Constitution: Realignment of Ideas about the Economy and Changes in the Political System in Venezuela.” Paper presented to the 2000 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami, FL, March 16–18.
16.
Linz, A. and Valenzuela, A. , eds (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
17.
Lucero, José Antonio (2001). “Crisis and Contention in Ecuador,”Journal of Democracy12(2): 59–73 .
18.
Montúfar, César (2000). La reconstrucción neoliberal. Febres Cordero o la estatización del neoliberalismo en Ecuador 1984–1988. Quito: Abya Ayala.
19.
Myers, David and O’Connor, Robert (1998). “Support for Coups in Democratic Political Culture. A Venezuelan Exploration,”Comparative Politics30(2): 193–212 .
20.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press .
21.
Pérez Liñán, Aníbal (1998). “Presidential Crises and Political Accountability in Latin America (1990–1997).” Paper presented to the 1998 LASA Conference, Chicago, IL.
22.
Polibio Córdova, Ángel (1999). “Opinión pública y relidad nacional. Los últimos 25 años,”Ecuador Debate46: 95–122 .
23.
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
24.
Przeworski, A. , Stokes, S.C. and Manin, B. , eds (1999). Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Remmer, Karen (1986). “The Politics of Economic Stabilization. IMF Standby Programs in Latin America 1954–1984,”Comparative Politics19(1): 1–24 .
26.
Remmer, Karen (1990). “Democracy and Economic Crisis: The Latin American Experience,”World Politics42(3): 315–335 .
27.
Roberts, Kenneth (1995). “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case,”World Politics48(1): 82–166 .
28.
Rodrik, D. (1998) “Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?,”Journal of Political Economy106(5): 997–1032 .
29.
Sachs, J. , Wing, T.W. and Xiaokai, Y. (2000). “Economic Reforms and Constitutional Transition,” Working Paper 43. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for International Development .
30.
Sánchez Parga, Jose (1993). “El gobierno estatal y la gobernabilidad. Entrevista a Mario Ribadeneira y Pablo Lucio Paredes,”Ecuador Debate30: 44–56 .
31.
Stokes, Susan (1999). “What do Policy Switches tell us about Democracy?” in Adam Przeworski , Susan Stokes and Bernard Manin (eds), Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
32.
Tanaka, Martín (2002a). La situación de la democracia en Colombia, Perú y Venezuela a inicios de siglo. Lima: Comisión Andina de Juristas.
33.
Tanaka, Martín (2002b). “Los partidos políticos en el fujimorismo y los retos de la reconstrucción,” in Marcelo Cavarozzi and Juan Aval Medina (eds), El asedio a la política. Los partidos latinoamericanos en la era neoliberal. Rosario and Santa Fe, Argentina: Homo Sapiens-Konrad Adenauer.
34.
Weber, Max (1977). Economía y sociedad. Mexico City and Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
35.
Whitehead, Lawrence (2001). “Bolivia and the Viability of Democracy,”Journal of Democracy12(2): 6–16 .
