During the past three decades, global environmental policy has increased in salience in international politics. What role has the USA, a principal actor in global affairs, played in multilateral efforts to promote environmental protection? What factors might account for US actions regarding progress or problems related to global environmental policy? In order to answer these questions, I examine the role of three principal actors in the US political system, namely, the American president, the Congress, and domestic organized interests. This discussion is followed by three case studies (the Montreal Protocol, the Convention on Global Climate Change, and the Convention on Biodiversity) that show the role of these political actors in shaping US global environmental policy. When the USA provides leadership, it bolsters multilateral efforts to address global environmental problems. When it fails to offer leadership, it weakens that effort. Either way, domestic political factors (rather than interstate relations) play a central role in shaping US global environmental policy.
Abramson, R. , Kempster, N. and Zang, J.G. (1992). “Bush Will Not Sign Wildlife Habitat Treaty.”Los Angeles Times, May 30.
2.
Ayres, E. (1998). “Worldwatch Report: Fastest Mass Extinction in Earth History,” URL (Consulted August 8, 2000): http://www.enn.com/enn-features-archive/1998/09/091698/fea0916asp.
“Bonn to Kyoto” (1998). “Hearing Before the Committee on International Relations,”House of Representatives, 105th Congress, 1st Session, November 13, 1997. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
5.
Bramble, B.J. and Porter, G. (1992). “Non-Governmental Organizations and the Making of International Environmental Policy,” in A. Hurrell and B. Kingsbury (eds), The International Politics of the Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
6.
Bryner, G. (1997). From Promises to Performance: Achieving Global Environmental Goals. New York: W.W. Norton .
7.
Bryner, G. (1999). “Agenda 21: Myth or Reality?” in N.J. Vig and R.S. Axelrod (eds), Global Environmental Policy: Institutions, Law, and Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
8.
Bryner, G. (2001). Gaia’s Wager: Environmental Movements and the Challenge of Sustainability. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
9.
Caldwell, L.K. (1988). “Beyond Environmental Diplomacy: The Changing Institutional Structure of International Cooperation,” in J.E. Carroll (ed.), International Environmental Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
10.
Caldwell, L.K. (1996). International Environmental Policy: From the Twentieth to the Twenty-First Century, 3rd edn.Durham and London: Duke University Press .
11.
Carter, N. (2001). The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
12.
Chasek, P.S. (2000). “The Global Environment in the Twenty-First Century: Prospects for International Cooperation,” in P.S. Chasek (ed.), The Global Environment in the Twenty-First Century. New York: United Nations University Press .
13.
Clark, W.C. (2001). “America’s National Interests in Promoting Transition to Sustainability: Issues for the New U.S. Administration,”Environment43: 19–27 .
14.
Claussen, E. (2001). “Global Environmental Governance: Issues for the New Administration,”Environment43: 29–34 .
15.
Cohen, J. (1995). “Presidents, Public Opinion, and Civil Rights: An Agenda Setting Perspective,” in J. Riddlesperger and D. Jackson (eds), Presidential Leadership and Civil Rights Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
16.
Council on Environmental Quality and US Department of State (1982). The Global 2000 Report to the President. New York: Penguin Books .
17.
De Mesquita, B.B. (2002). “Domestic Politics and International Relations,”International Studies Quarterly46: 1–9 .
18.
DeSombre, E.R. (2000). Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists, and U.S. Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
19.
Dunlap, R. , Gallup, G.H., Jr and Gallup, A.M. (1999). “Of Global Concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey,” in D.L. Soden and B.S. Steel (eds), Handbook of Global Environmental Policy and Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker .
20.
Elliott, L. (1998). The Global Politics of the Environment. New York: New York University Press .
21.
Falk, R.A. (1971). This Endangered Planet: Prospects and Proposals for Human Survival. New York: Vintage Books .
22.
Falkner, R. (2001). “Business Conflict and U.S. International Environmental Policy: Ozone, Climate, Biodiversity,” in P.G. Harris (ed.), The Environment, International Relations, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
23.
Fiorino, D.J. (1995). Making Environmental Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press .
24.
Glennon, M.J. and Stewart, A.L. (2000). “The United States: Taking Environmental Treaties Seriously,” in E.B. Weiss and H.K. Jacobson (eds), Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
25.
“Governments Sound Biodiversity Alarm in Nairobi” (2000). URL (consulted August 8, 2000): http://www.enn.com/2000/NATU...22/biodiversity.conference.enn/index.html.
26.
Gushee, D.E. (1989). Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: Regulatory Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress .
27.
Harris, P.G. (2001). “International Environmental Affairs and U.S. Foreign Policy,” in P.G. Harris (ed.), The Environment, International Relations, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
28.
Hertsgaard, M. (1998). Earth Odyssey. New York: Broadway Books .
29.
Holtrup, P. (2003). “The Lack of U.S. Leadership in Climate Change Diplomacy,” in B. May and M.H. Moore (eds), The Uncertain Superpower: Domestic Dimensions of U.S. Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Opladen: Leske and Budrich .
30.
Jasonoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
31.
Kamieniecki, S. (1995). “Political Parties and Environmental Policy,” in J. P. Lester (ed.), Environmental Politics and Policy, 2nd edn.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press .
32.
Kauffman, J.M. (1997). “Domestic and International Linkages in Global Environmental Politics: A Case Study of the Montreal Protocol,” in M.A. Schreurs and E. Economy (eds), The Internationalization of Environmental Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
33.
Kennedy, D. and Sant, R.W. (2000). “A Global Environmental Agenda for the United States,”Environment42: 20–24 .
34.
Kernell, S. (1997). Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 3rd edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press .
35.
Landy, M.K. , Roberts, M.J. and Thomas, S.R. (1994). The Environmental Protection Agency, expanded edn.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press .
36.
MacDonald, G.J. (1988). “Scientific Basis for the Greenhouse Effect,”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7: 425–444 .
37.
Oberthur, S. and Ott, H.E. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Change Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag .
38.
Paarlberg, R. (1997). “Earth in Abeyance: Explaining Weak Leadership in U.S. International Environmental Policy,” in R.J. Lieber (ed.), Eagle Adrift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century. New York: Longman .
39.
Paarlberg, R. (1999). “Lapsed Leadership: U.S. International Environmental Policy Since Rio,” in N.J. Vig and R.S. Axelrod (eds), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
40.
Porter, G. , Brown, J.W. and Chasek, P.S. (2000). Global Environmental Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
41.
Prescott, J. (2000). “It’s Time for a Deal.”The Washington Post National Weekly Edition, November 13: S1-S1.
42.
Raustiala, K. (1997). “The Domestic Politics of Global Biodiversity Protection in the United Kingdom and the United States,” in M.A. Schreurs and E. Economy (eds), The Internationalization of Environmental Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
43.
Revkin, A.C. (2002). “Climate Changing, U.S. Says in Report.”New York Times, June 3.
44.
Rosenau, J. (1993). “Environmental Challenges in a Global Context,” in S. Kamieniecki (ed.), Environmental Politics in the International Arena: Movements, Parties, Organizations and Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press .
45.
Rowlands, I.H. (1995). The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press .
46.
Saad, L. and Dunlap, R. (2000). “Americans are Environmentally Friendly, But Issue Not Seen as Urgent Problem.”Gallup Poll Report, April 17. URL (consulted July 22, 2000): http://www.gallup.com.
47.
Schneider, S.H. (1989). “The Changing Climate,”Scientific American (September): 70–79 .
48.
Soroos, M. (1997). The Endangered Atmosphere: Preserving a Global Commons. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press .
49.
Springer, A.L. (1988). “United States Environmental Policy and International Law: Stockholm Principle 21 Revisited,” in J. E. Carroll (ed.), International Environmental Diplomacy: The Management and Resolution of Transfrontier Environmental Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
50.
Sprinz, D.F. and Weifrs, M. (2001). “Domestic Politics and Global Climate Policy,” in U. Luerbacher and D.F. Sprinz (eds), International Relations and Global Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
51.
Steel, B.S. , Clinton, R.L. and Lovrich, N.P., Jr (2003). Environmental Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill .
52.
Sussman, G. and Kelso, M.A. (1999). “Environmental Priorities and the President as Chief Legislator,” in D.L. Soden (ed.), The Environmental Presidency. Albany: State University of New York Press .
53.
Sussman, G. , Daynes, B.W. and West, J.P. (2002). American Politics and the Environment. New York: Longman .
54.
Tatalovich, R. and Daynes, B.W. (1984). Presidential Power in the United States. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
55.
Tolba, M.K. (1998). Global Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating Environmental Agreements for the World, 1973–1992. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
56.
United Nations (2002). “Oceans: The Source of Life: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 20th Anniversary (1982–2002),” URL: http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_20years/oceanssourceoflife.pdf.
57.
United Nations Environment Programme (1997). Register of International Treaties and Other Agreements in the Field of the Environment, 1996. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme .
58.
United Nations Environment Programme (2003). “The Environment Fund,” URL (consulted July 6, 2003): http://www.unep.org/rmu/html/fund_environment.htm.
59.
US Department of State (1998). “Environmental Diplomacy,” fact sheet released by the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs , November 30.
60.
US Department of State (1999). “Environmental Diplomacy: The Environment and U.S. Foreign Policy,” URL (consulted June 10, 1999): http://www.state.gov/www/global/oes/earth.html.
61.
Vogel, D. and Kessler, T. (2000). “How Compliance Happens and Doesn’t Happen Domestically,” in E.B. Weiss and H.K. Jacobson (eds), Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
62.
Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press .
63.
Weisskopf, M. (1988). “The Evidence on the Greenhouse Effect.”The Washington Post National Weekly Edition, August 29–September 4: 8–9.
64.
Wolkomir, R. (1988). “The Greenhouse Revolution: Climates are Changing – And So Will Coastlines as Sea Levels Rise,”Oceans (April): 16–20, 59–59 .
65.
Young, O. (1997). “Rights, Rules, and Resources in World Affairs,” in O. Young (ed.), Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
