Many democratic voting systems simply present voters with a choice between parties, while others give them the opportunity to choose among individual candidates as well. This article focuses on the latter type of electoral systems, that is, those allowing for preferential voting. A classification according to the degree and type of candidate choice is presented, and the electoral systems of some 70 democracies are classified with the aid of this scheme. Preferential voting proper is found to be largely a western European phenomenon. Eight hypotheses concerning the effects of preferential voting on party systems, parties, candidates, and voters are tested. Overall, the impression is that preferential voting has few discernible effects at the aggregate level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anckar, D. and Anckar, C. (2000). “Democracies without Parties,” Comparative Political Studies33(2): 225–247 .
2.
Bienen, H.S. and Van de Walle, N. (1991). Of Time and Power: Leadership Duration in the Modern World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
3.
Blais, A. (1991). “The Debate over Electoral Systems,” International Political Science Review12(3): 239–260 .
4.
Bowler, S. and Farrell, D.F. (1993). “Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator-Voter Relationships,” Journal of Common Market Studies31(1): 45–69 .
5.
Browne, E., Frendeis, J. and Gleiber, D. (1986). “Dissolution of Governments in Scandinavia: A Critical Events Perspective,” Scandinavian Political Studies9: 93–110 .
6.
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M. (1987). The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
7.
Carey, J.M. and Shugart, M.S. (1995). “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439 .
8.
Cox, G.W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Curtice, J. and Shively, W.P. (2002). “Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many?” Unpublished manuscript.
11.
Damgaard (2003). Folkets styre. Magt og ansvar i dansk politik. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
12.
Derbyshire, J.D. and Derbyshire, I. (1999). Political Systems of the World, Volume 1. Oxford: Helicon .
13.
Dogan, M. (1989). “Irremovable Leaders and Ministerial Instability in European Democracies,” in M. Dogan (ed.), Pathways to Power: Selecting Rulers in Pluralist Democracies. Boulder, CO: Westview .
14.
Eckstein, H. (1966). Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
15.
Farrell, D.M. (1996). “Campaign Strategies and Tactics,” in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Comparative Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Freedom House (1994). Freedom in the World. The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1993–1994. New York .
18.
Freedom House (1999). Freedom in the World. The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1998–1999. New York .
19.
Gidlund, G. (1999). “Att s‰tta gr‰nser för pengars makt,” in S. Holmberg and T. Möller (eds), Premi‰r för personval. SOU 1999: 92. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.
20.
Hurwitz, L. (1973). “Contemporary Approaches to Political Stability,” Comparative Political Studies6: 449–463 .
21.
IDEA (1997). Voter Turnout from 1945 to 1997: A Global Report on Political Participation. Stockholm .
22.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (1993) Electoral Systems: A World-Wide Comparative Study. Geneva .
23.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (various years). Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections and Developments. Geneva .
24.
Johnston, J.P. and Koene, M. (2000). “Learning History’s Lessons Anew,” in S. Bowler and B. Grofman (eds), Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
25.
Justitiedepartementet (1986). “Valsystemet i 20 l‰nder. En översikt. Rapport till folkstyrelsekommittÈn,” Magnus Isberg. DS Ju. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsetcentral.
26.
Katz, R.S. (1980). A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
27.
Katz, R.S. (1986). “Intraparty Preference Voting,” in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (eds), Electoral Laws and their Consequences. New York: Agathon Press .
28.
Katz, R.S. (1996). “Party Organizations and Finance,” in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Comparative Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
29.
Komiteanmietintö (1999). “Vaalirahoituskomitean mietintö. Bet‰nkande av valfinansieringskommittÈn.” Komiteanmietintö/KommittÈbet‰nkande 1999: 6. Helsinki: OY Edita AB.
30.
Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
31.
McKean, M. and Scheiner, E. (2000). “Japan’s New Electoral System: La Plus Áa Change...,” Electoral Studies19: 447–477 .
32.
Marsh, M. (1985). “The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems,” European Journal of Political Research13: 365–378 .
33.
Matland, R.E. and Studlar, D.T. (2004). “Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross National Analysis,” manuscript accepted for publication in British Journal of Political Science.
34.
Mayer, L. (1980). “Party Systems and Cabinet Stability,” in P. Merkl (ed.), Western European Party Systems: Trends and Prospects. New York: Free Press .
35.
Petersson, O., Von Beyme, K., Karvonen, L., Nedelmann, B. and Smith, E. (1999). Democracy the Swedish Way: Report from the Democratic Audit of Sweden 1999. Stockholm: SNS Förlag .
36.
Roberts, K.M. and Wibbels, E. (1999). “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations,” American Political Science Review93(3): 575–590 .
37.
Rule, W. (1994). “Parliaments of, by and for the People: Except for Women?” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
38.
Saalfeld, T. (1995). “On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes,” in H. Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag and St. Martin’s Press .
39.
S·nchez de Dios, M. (1999). “Parliamentary Party Discipline in Spain,” in S. Bowler, D.M. Farrell and R.S. Katz (eds), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press .
40.
Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan .
41.
Shugart, M.S. (1994). “Minorities Represented and Unrepresented,” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
42.
Statens offentliga utedningar (1977). “Personval och valkretsindelning.” Bet‰nkande av personvals-och valkretskommittÈn. SOU 1977: 94. Stockholm: Gotab.
43.
Statens offentliga utedningar (1993). “÷kat personval.” Bet‰nkande av personvalskommittÈn. SOU 1993: 21. Stockholm: Norstedts tryckeri AB.
44.
Taagepera, R. (1994). “Beating the Law of Minority Attrition,” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
45.
Taylor, M. and Herman, V.M. (1971). “Party Systems and Government Stability,” American Political Science Review65: 28–37 .
46.
Warwick, P.V. (1994). Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
47.
Wright, J.F.H. (1986). “The Australian Experience with Majority-Preferential and Quota-Preferential Systems,” in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (eds), Electoral Laws and their Consequences. New York: Agathon Press .
