There is a growing literature in comparative health policy that analyzes the experiences of different countries. This article draws upon the comparative tradition, but has an intra-country focus. It considers the case of New Zealand, which has had four different public health sector structures in a decade, with fundamental changes enacted following general elections in 1990, 1996 and 1999. New Zealand's structures have included a system of locally based area health boards responsible for both funding and services delivery in their regions; a competitive, profit-oriented market system with separate agencies purchasing and providing health-care services; a centralized system with one corporate agency planning for population needs and purchasing services from a range of providers; and a system in which planning and purchasing is devolved to district boards. In tandem with the constant restructurings, a variety of policy and service innovations have emerged in areas such as the organization of primary-care physicians, indigenous Maori health care, pharmaceutical purchasing and the prioritization of services and patients. First, the article reviews the field of comparative health policy studies. Next, it outlines New Zealand's four health sector structures. Lastly, the article discusses the performance, implications and lessons of New Zealand's successive health sector changes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel-Smith, B., J. Figueras, W. Holland, M. McKee, and E. Mossialos (1995). Choices in Health Policy: An Agenda for the European Union. Aldershot: Dartmouth .
2.
Altenstetter, C. and J. W. Bjorkman (eds) (1997). Health Policy Reform: National Variations and Globalization. London: Macmillan .
3.
Altenstetter, C. and S. Haywood (eds) (1991). Comparative Health Policy and the New Right: From Rhetoric to Reality. London: Macmillan .
4.
Auckland UniServices Limited (1992). Independent Practitioner Associations in New Zealand: Policy Issues. Report to the Health Reforms Directorate and the Independent Practitioners Association Inc. Auckland: University of Auckland.
5.
Aucoin, P. (1990). “Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums.” Governance, 3: 115-137 .
6.
Bassett, M. (1976). The Third Labour Government. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press .
7.
Beaglehole, R. and P. Davis (1992). “Setting National Health Goals and Targets in the Context of a Fiscal Crisis: The Politics of Social Choice in New Zealand.” International Journal of Health Services, 22(3): 417-428 .
8.
Boston, J. and P. Dalziel (eds) (1992). The Decent Society? Essays in Response to National's Economic and Social Policies. Auckland: Oxford University Press .
9.
Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh (1996). Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press .
10.
Bridgeport Group (1992). The Core Debate Stage One: How Shall We Define the Core? Review of Submissions. Wellington: Bridgeport Group .
11.
Brown, L.D. (1998). “Exceptionalism as the Rule? us Health Policy Innovation and Cross-National Learning.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23(1): 35-51 .
ccmau (1993). Crown Health Enterprises Performance Reporting Measures, September. Wellington: Crown Company Monitoring Advisory Unit .
14.
ccmau (1998). Hospital and Health Services Performance Reporting Measures, December. Wellington: Crown Company Monitoring Advisory Unit .
15.
Chinitz, D. (1995). “Israel's Health Policy Breakthrough: The Politics of Reform and the Reform of Politics.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 20(4): 909-932 .
16.
Coulter, A. and C. Ham (eds) (2000). The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Buckingham: Open University Press .
17.
Creech, W. (1999). The Government's Medium-term Strategy for Health and Disability Support Services. Wellington: Ministry of Health .
18.
Degeling, P., D. Hunter, and B. Dowdeswell (2001). “Changing Health Care Systems.” Journal of Integrated Care Pathways, 5: 64-69 .
19.
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, ma: mit Press .
20.
Dopson, S. and I. Waddington (1996). “Managing Social Change: A Process-Sociological Approach to Understanding Organisational Change within the National Health Service.” Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(4): 525-550 .
21.
Elmore, R. (1980). “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Political Science Quarterly, 94: 601-616 .
22.
Gauld, R. (2000a). “Big Bang and the Policy Prescription: Health Care Meets the Market in New Zealand.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(5): 815-844 .
23.
Gauld, R. (2000b). “Survey of Senior hfa Officials: Report to the hfa.” Dunedin: New Zealand Health Sector Transition Project, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago .
24.
Gauld, R. (2001). Revolving Doors: New Zealand's Health Reforms. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies/Health Services Research Centre .
25.
Gauld, R. and S. Derrett (2000). “Solving the Surgical Waiting List Problem? New Zealand's `Booking System.'” International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 15(4): 259-272 .
26.
Gibbs, A., D. Fraser, and J. Scott (1988). Unshackling the Hospitals: Report of the Hospital and Related Services Taskforce. Wellington: Hospital and Related Services Taskforce .
27.
Ham, C. (1997). Health Care Reform: Learning from International Experience. Buckingham: Open University Press .
28.
Heidenheimer, A., H. Heclo, and C. Adams (1990). Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in America, Europe, and Japan, 3rd edn. New York: St Martin's Press .
29.
Jacobs, L., T. Marmor, and J. Oberlander (1999). “The Oregon Health Plan and the Political Paradox of Rationing: What Advocates and Critics Have Claimed and What Oregon Did.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24(1): 161-180 .
30.
King, A. (2000). The New Zealand Health Strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health .
31.
Lane, J-E. and S. Ersson (2000). The New Institutional Politics: Performance and Outcomes. London: Routledge .
32.
McKee, M. and J. Healy (eds) (2002). Hospitals in a Changing Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press .
33.
Malcolm, L. (1990). “Service Management: New Zealand's Model of Resource Management.” Health Policy, 16: 255-263 .
34.
Ministry of Health (2000). Health Expenditure Trends in New Zealand 1980-1999. Wellington: Ministry of Health .
35.
Ministry of Health (2001a). The Health and Independence Report. Wellington: Ministry of Health .
36.
Ministry of Health (2001b). From Strategy to Reality: The wave Project. Wellington: Ministry of Health .
37.
Moran, M. (1999). Governing the Health Care State: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
38.
New Zealand Medical Journal (2001). “And Now the Failure of Cervical Screening,” Editorial . New Zealand Medical Journal, 114: 221-222 .
39.
New Zealand Treasury (1990). Performance of the Health System. Wellington: The Treasury .
40.
oecd (1994). The Reform of Health Care Systems: A Review of Seventeen oecd Countries. Paris: oecd.
41.
oecd (1995). New Directions in Health Care Policy. Paris: oecd.
42.
oecd (1996). Health Care Reforms: The Will to Change. Paris: oecd .
43.
Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press .
Peterson, M.A. (ed.) (1998). Healthy Markets? The New Competition in Medical Care. Durham, nc: Duke University Press .
46.
Raffel, M. and N. Raffel (eds) (1987). Perspectives on Health Policy: Australia, New Zealand, United States. Chichester: John Wiley .
47.
Ramesh, M. (2000). Welfare Capitalism in Southeast Asia: Social Security, Health and Education Policies. London: Macmillan .
48.
Ranade, W. (ed.) (1998). Markets and Health Care: A Comparative Analysis. London: Longman .
49.
Roemer, M. (1991). Health Care Systems of the World: Vols 1 & 2. New York: Oxford University Press .
50.
Saltman, R., J. Figueras, and C. Sakellarides (eds) (1998). Critical Challenges for Health Care Reform in Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press .
51.
Scott, C. (2001). Public and Private Roles in Health Care Systems: Experiences from Seven oecd Countries. Buckingham: Open University Press .
52.
Scott, C., G. Fougere, and J. Marwick (1986). Choices for Health Care: Report of the Health Benefits Review. Wellington: Health Benefits Review .
53.
Steering Group (1997). Implementing the Coalition Agreement on Health. The Report of the Steering Group to Oversee Health and Disability Changes to the Minister of Health and the Associate Minister of Health. Wellington: Steering Group.
54.
Stent, R. (1998). Canterbury Health Limited: A Report by the Health and Disability Commissioner April 1998. Wellington: Health and Disability Commissioner .
55.
Tang, K-L. (2000). Social Welfare Development in East Asia. Houndmills: Palgrave .
56.
Tuohy, C. (1999). Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain and Canada. New York: Oxford University Press .
57.
Upton, S. (1991). Your Health and the Public Health: A Statement of Government Health Policy. Wellington: Government Printer .
58.
Van Eyk, H., F. Baum, and G. Houghton (2001). “Coping with Health Care Reform.” Australian Health Review, 24(2): 202-206 .
59.
who (2000). The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: who.
60.
who (2001). Health and Welfare Systems Development in the 21st Century. Kobe: who .
