In developing an analytical framework for the comparative study of processes of democratization by elections, this article first lays out the techniques of electoral manipulation authoritarian rulers employ to control electoral outcomes. It argues next that manipulated elections tend to trigger two-level games in which electoral competition is “nested” inside electoral reform, and outlines the causal interaction and strategic interdependence of the two levels. It describes the basic strategic choices and strategic dilemmas actors face in iterative cycles of conflict. It analyzes the uncertainties of results, relations of power, and strategic responses that characterize the game. Finally, it explains how actors may cope with its ambivalent and uncertain nature—they may devise “mixed” strategies or privilege one level of the game over the other.
Barkan J.D. (2000). “Protracted Transitions Among Africa's New Democracies.”Democratization, 7(3): 227-243.
2.
Barkan J.D. and N. Ng'ethe (1998). “Kenya Tries Again.”Journal of Democracy, 9(2): 32-48.
3.
Berman, M. (1982). All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin Books.
4.
Boroumand, L. and R. Boroumand (2000). “Is Iran Democratizing? Reform at an Impasse.”Journal of Democracy, 11(4): 114-128.
5.
Bremmer, I. and C. Welt (1997). “Armenia's New Autocrats.”Journal of Democracy, 8(3): 77-91.
6.
Brumberg, D. (2000). “Is Iran Democratizing? A Comparativist's Perspective.”Journal of Democracy, 11(4): 129-134.
7.
Case, W. F. (1996). “Can the `Halfway House' Stand? Semidemocracy and Elite Theory in Three Southeast Asian Countries.”Comparative Politics, 28(4): 437-464.
8.
Collier, D. and R. Adcock (1999). “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts.”Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 537-565.
9.
Dahl, R.A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press.
10.
Diamond, L. and M.F. Plattner (2000). “Is Iran Democratizing?”Journal of Democracy, 11(4): 107-113.
11.
DiPalma, G. (1990). To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Eisenstadt, T.A. (1999). “Weak Electoral Institutions or Legacies of Social Conflict? Modeling Causes of Mexico's Local Post-Electoral Mobilizations, 1989-1998.”95th Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association (apsa), Atlanta, 2-5 September.
13.
Eisenstadt, T.A. (2000). “Eddies in the Third Wave: Protracted Transitions and Theories of Democratization.”Democratization, 7(3): 3-24.
14.
Elster, J. (1998). “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (P. Hedström and R. Swedberg, eds), pp. 45-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gyimah-Boadi, E. (1999). “Institutionalizing Credible Elections in Ghana.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, eds), pp. 105-121. Boulder, co: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
16.
Hirschman, A.O. (1995). A Propensity to Self-Subversion. Cambridge, ma.: Harvard University Press.
17.
Huntington, S.P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, ok: University of Oklahoma Press.
18.
Joseph, R. (1998a). “Africa, 1990-1997: From Abertura to Closure.”Journal of Democracy, 9(2): 3-17.
19.
Joseph, R. (1998b). “Is Ethiopia Democratic? Oldspeak vs. Newspeak.”Journal of Democracy, 9(4): 55-61.
20.
Lamounier, B. (1989). “Authoritarian Brazil Revisited: The Impact of Elections on the Abertura.” In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation (A. Stepan, ed.), pp. 43-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Lehoucq, F.E. and I. Molina (forthcoming). Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Levitsky, S. (1999). “Fujimori and Post-Party Politics in Peru.”Journal of Democracy, 10(3): 78-92.
23.
Linz, J.J. and A. Stepan (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Loaeza, S. (2000). “Uncertainty in Mexico's Protracted Transition: The National Action Party and Its Aversion to Risk.”Democratization, 7(3): 93-116.
25.
McFaul, M. (2000). “Russia Under Putin: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.”Journal of Democracy, 11(3): 19-33.
26.
Mizrahi, Y. (1995). “Democracia, eficiencia y participación: Los dilemas de los gobiernos de oposición en México.”Política y Gobierno, 2(2): 177-205.
27.
Molinar Horcasitas, J. (1991). El tiempo de la legitimidad: Elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.
28.
Monga, C. (1997). “Eight Problems with African Politics.”Journal of Democracy, 8(3): 156-179.
29.
Mozaffar, S. and R. Vengroff (forthcoming). “A `Whole System' Approach to the Choice of Electoral Rules in Democratizing Countries: The Case of Senegal.”Electoral Studies.
30.
O'Donnell, G. and P.C. Schmitter (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Pastor, R.A. (1998). “Mediating Elections.”Journal of Democracy, 9(1): 154-163.
32.
Pastor, R.A. (1999). “The Role of Electoral Administration in Democratic Transitions: Implications for Policy and Research.”Democratization, 6(4): 1-27.
33.
Prud'homme, J.F. (1999). “State Electoral Conflicts and National Interparty Relations in Mexico, 1988-1994.” In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico (W.A. Cornelius, T.A. Eisenstadt, and J. Hindley, eds), pp. 343-360. La Jolla: Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
34.
Przeworski, A. , M.E. Alvarez, J.A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Pusić, V. (1998). “Croatia at the Crossroads.”Journal of Democracy, 9(1): 111-124.
36.
Reynoso, D. (2000). “Distritos y escaños: Malaporcionamiento y representación partidaria en perspectiva comparada.”flacso, Mexico City, phd dissertation.
37.
Santiuste, S. (2000). “Del monopolio del poder a la competencia electoral: La incompleta transformación del fsln.”flacso, Mexico City, phd dissertation.
38.
Schedler, A. (2000). “Mexico's Victory: The Democratic Revelation.”Journal of Democracy, 11(4): 5-19.
39.
Shain, Y. and J.J. Linz (1995). Between States: Interim Governments and Democratic Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Sithole, M. (1997). “Zimbabwe's Eroding Authoritarianism.”Journal of Democracy, 8(1): 127-141.
41.
Sivan, E. (1997). “Constraints and Opportunities in the Arab World.”Journal of Democracy, 8(2): 103-113.
42.
Sivan, E. (2000). “Arabs and Democracy: Illusions of Change.”Journal of Democracy, 11(3): 69-83.
43.
Skidmore, T.E. (1989). “Brazil's Slow Road to Democratization: 1974-1985. In Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation (A. Stepan, ed.), pp. 5-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Snyder, J. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W.W. Norton.
45.
Talbi, M. (2000). “Arabs and Democracy: A Record of Failure.”Journal of Democracy, 11(3): 58-68.
46.
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
Whitehead, L. (1999). “The Drama of Democratization.”Journal of Democracy, 10(4): 84-98.
48.
Wiseman, J.A. (1998). “The Gambia: From Coup to Elections.”Journal of Democracy, 9(2): 64-75.
49.
Youngers, C.A. (2000). “Deconstructing Democracy: Peru Under President Alberto Fujimori.”Washington, dc: Washington Office on Latin America.
50.
Zakaria, F. (1997). “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.”Foreign Affairs, 76(6): 22-43.
