verstehen and dialecdtic: epistemology and methodology in weber andlukacs

Abel T. 1948 “The Operation Called ‘Verstehen’,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 54

Antoni C. 1972a “Lukács’ Theory of Reification,” Telos, No. 11.

Antoni C. 1972b “Georg Lukács: The Search For A Revolutionary Subject,” in D. Howard and K.

Antoni C. Klare, The Unknown Dimension, Basic Books, N.Y.

Antoni C. 1974 “The Neo-Idealist Defense of Subjectivity,” Telos, No. 21.

Aron R. 1961 An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.

Ashcraft R. 1972 “Marx and Weber on Liberalism as Bourgeois Ideology, Comparative Studies In Society and History, 14:2

Beck L. 1967 “Neo-Kantianism,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5, Macmillan, N.Y.

Bernstein R. 1976 The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, Harcourt, N.Y.

Breines P. 1970 “Notes on Lukács’ ‘The Old Culture and the New Culture’,” Telos, No. 5.

Breines P. 1972 Lukács & Korsch 1910-1932, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin.

Bruyn S. 1974 “The Dialectical Society,” Cultural Hermeneutics, 2:2, August.

Burger T. 1976 Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation, Duke UP.

Cerutti F. 1976 “Hegel, Lukács and Korsch,” Telos, No. 26.

Cohen J. 1972 “Max Weber and the Dynamics of Domination,” Telos, No. 14.

Colletti L. 1973 Marxism and Hegel, New Left Books, London.

Connerton P. 1974 “The Collective Historical Subject,” British Journal of Sociology, 25: 2.

Dallmayr F. 1970 “History and Class Consciousness,” Politics and Society, 1:1, November.

Dallmayr F. , and McCarthy T. 1977 “Introduction: The Crisis of Understanding,” in Understanding & Social Inquiry, Dallmayr , and McCarthy , editors, University of Notre Dame Press.

Dawe A. 1971 “The Relevance of Values,” in Sahay A. ed., Max Weber and Modern Sociology, Routledge, London.

Eldridge J. 1971a “Weber's Approach To the Sociological Study of Industrial Workers,” in Sahay A. ed., Max Weber and Modern Sociology, Routledge, London.

Eldridge J. 1971b “Introductory Essay” to M. Weber: The Interpretation of Social Reality, Eldridge J. , ed., Michael Joseph, London.

Feenberg A. 1971 “Reification and the Antinomies of Socialist Thought,” Telos, No. 10.

Feenberg A. 1972a “Lukács and the Critique of Orthodox Marxism,” Philosophical Forum, 3: 34.

Feenberg A. 1972b The Dialectics of Theory and Practice, Ph.D. Dissertation, U.C. San Diego.

Frisby D. 1976 “Introduction to the English Translation,” Adorno T. , ed., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, Henemann, London.

Giddens A. 1971 Capitalism and Modern Social Theory, Cambridge UP.

Goddard D. 1973 “Max Weber & The Objectivity of Social Science,” History and Theory, 12: 1.

Goldmann L. 1969 The Human Sciences and Philosophy, J. Cape, London.

Goldstein L. 1974 “Ideals of Order: History & Sociology, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 4: 4.

Gouldner A. 1955 “Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy,” American Political Science Review, 49, June.

Gouldner A. 1970 The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Avon, NY.

Gouldner A. 1971 “Comments on History and Class Consciousness,” New York Times Book Review, July 18.

Greisman H. 1976 “‘Disenchantment of the World’,” British Journal of Sociology, 27:4, December.

Gunnell J. 1975 Philosophy, Science, and Political Inquiry, General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J.

Habermas J. 1975 Legitimation Crisis, Beacon, Boston.

Hearn F. 1975 “The Dialectical Use of Ideal Types,” Theory and Society, 2:4, Winter.

Hemple C. 1963 “Typological Methods in the Social Sciences,” in Natanson M. , ed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Macmillan, N.Y.

Hindess B. 1973 “Models and Masks,” Economy and Society, 2: 2.

Hindess B. and Hirst P. 1975 Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production, Routledge, London.

Hoffman J. 1975 Marxism and the Theory of Praxis, International Publishers, N.Y.

Honigsheim P. 1968 On Max Weber, Free Press, N.Y.

Horkheimer M. 1947 Eclipse of Reason, Oxford UP., N.Y.

Hughes H. 1958 Consciousness and Society, Random House, N.Y.

Iggers G. 1968 The German Conception of History, Wesleyan UP.

Jameson F. 1971 Marxism and Form, Princeton UP.

Jameson F. 1973 “Narrative Structure in Max Weber,” New German Critique, No. 1, Winter.

Jacobson D. 1976 “Rationalization and Emancipation in Weber & Haberman,” Graduate Faculty Journal of Sociology, 1:2, Winter.

Jay M. 1973 The Dialectical Imagination, Little Brown, Boston.

Jones G. 1971 “The Marxism of the Early Lukács,” New Left Review, No. 70.

Kadarkay A. 1969 Georg Lukács: An Intellectual Portrait, Ph.D. dissertation, U.C. Santa Barbara.

Kiralyfalvi B. 1975 The Aesthetics of Gyorgy Lukács, Princeton UP.

Kozyr-Kowalski S. 1973 “Idealism and Dialectics in the Young Lukács’ Philosophy of History,” Dialectics and Humanism, Autumn.

Kruger M. 1969 “Sociology of Knowledge and Social Theory,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 14.

Landmann M. 1976 “Critiques of Reason from Weber to Bloch,” Telos, No. 29.

Lavine T. 1950 “Knowledge as Interpretation,” (Two Parts) Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 10:4, 11:1, June, September.

Levine D. and Levine L. 1975 “Social Theory and Social Action,” Economy and Society, 4:2, May.

Levison A. 1974 Knowledge and Society, Pegasus, N.Y.

Lovell T. 1973 “Weber, Goldmann, and the Sociology of Beliefs,” European Journal of Sociology, 14: 2.

Lukács G. 1966 “Technology and Social Relations,” New Left Review, No. 39, September-October.

Lukács G. 1970 “The Old Culture and the New Culture,” Telos, No. 5, Spring.

Lukács G. 1971 History and Class Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Lukács G. 1972 “Max Weber and German Sociology,” Economy and Society, 1:4, November.

Lukács G. 1973 The Theory of the Novel, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Lukács G. 1974 Soul and Form, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Lukes S. 1973 Individualism, Harper and Row, N.Y.

Marcuse H. 1968 Reason and Revolution, Beacon Press, Boston.

Marcuse H. 1969 “Industrialization and Capitalism,” in Marcuse, Negations, Beacon, Boston.

Marx K. 1959 Capital, International Publishers, N.Y.

Marx K. 1971 Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, International Publishers, N.Y.

Marx K. 1973 Grundrisse, Vintage, N.Y.

Mayer C. 1975 “Max Weber's Interpretation of Karl Marx,” Social Research, 42:4, Winter.

McCarthy T. 1973 “On Misunderstanding ‘Understanding’,” Theory and Decision, 3:4, June.

Merleau-Ponty M. 1973 Adventures of the Dialectic, Northwestern UP, Evanston.

Mészáros I. 1972 Lukács’ Concept of the Dialectic, Merlin Press, London.

Mitzman A. 1969 The Iron Cage, Grosset & Dunlop, N.Y.

Mommsen W. 1974 The Age of Bureaucracy, Blackwell, Oxford.

Natanson M. 1974 Phenomenology, Role, and Reason, C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.

Nisbet R. 1967 The Sociological Tradition, N.Y.

Oakes G. 1975 “Introduction,” to M. Weber, Roscher & Knies, Free Press, N.Y.

Oakes G. 1977 “The Verstehen Thesis and the Foundations of Weber's Methodology,” History and Theory, 16: 1.

Oestereicher E. 1972 “Lukács and the ‘Crisis of Bourgeois Philosophy’,” Critical Anthropology, 2:2, Spring.

Offe C. 1974 “The Theory of the Capitalist State and the Problem of Policy Formation,” paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association.

Outhwaite W. 1975 Understanding Social Life: The Method Called Verstehen, Allen & Unwin, London.

Parkinson G. 1970 “Introduction,” to Georg Lukács: The Man, His Work, and His Ideas, Vintage, N.Y.

Parsons T. 1949 The Structure of Social Action, Free Press, N.Y.

Parsons T. 1971 “Value Freedom and Objectivity,” in Stammer O. , ed. Max Weber and Sociology Today, Harper and Row, N.Y.

Philo G. and Walton P. 1973 “Max Weber on Self-Interest and Domination,” Social Theory and Practice, 2:3, Spring.

Piccone P. 1972 “Dialectic and Materialism in Lukács,” Telos, No. 11.

Plotke D. 1975 “Marxism, Sociology and Crisis,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 20.

Popper K. 1964 The Poverty of Historicism, Harper and Row, N.Y.

Popper K. 1969 Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London.

Rasmussen D. 1973 “Between Autonomy and Sociality,” Cultural Hermeneutics, 1:1, April.

Razzell P. 1977 “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: A Natural Scientific Critique, British Journal of Sociology, 28:1, March.

Reid H. and Yanarella E. 1974 “Toward a Post-Modern Theory of American Political Science and Culture,” Cultural Hermeneutics, 2:2, August.

Rex J. 1971 “Typology and Objectivity,” in Sahay A. , ed., Max Weber and Modern Sociology, Routledge, London.

Rickert H. 1962 Science and History: A Critique of Positivist Epistemology, Van Nostrand, Princeton.

Richman H. 1967 Understanaing and the Human Sciences, Heinemann, London.

Rieser M. 1958 “Lukács’ Critique of German Philosophy,” Journal of Philosophy, 55:5, February.

Roth G. 1976 “History and Sociology in the Work of Max Weber,” British Journal of Sociology, 27:3, September.

Schmidt J. 1975 “Lukács’ Concept of Proletarian Bildung,” Telos, No. 24.

Schroyer T. 1971-72 “The Politics of Epistemology,” International Journal of Sociology, 1:4

Schroyer T. 1973a Critique of Domination, Beacon, Boston.

Schroyer T. 1973b “Weber and Dilthey,” New Scholar, 4: 1.

Schutz A. 1969 Collected Papers, Vol. I. Nijhoff, The Hague.

Scott J. 1974 “Sociological Theorizing and the Althusserian Ideal,” Sociological Analysis and Theory, 4: 2.

Shaw M. 1975 Marxism and Social Science, Pluto Press, London.

Simmel G. 1978 The Philosophy of Money, (trans. T. Bottomore and D. Frisby), Routledge and Kegan, Paul, Boston.

Skinner Q. 1972 “‘Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Action,” in P. Laslett and W. Runciman, eds., Philosophy Politics and Society (4th series).

Wright E. 1974 “To Control or to Smash Bureaucracy: Weber and Lenin on Politics, The State, and Bureaucracy,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology, Vol. 19.

Zeitlin I. 1973 Rethinking Sociology, Prentice Hall, N.Y.