This paper demonstrates the potential of democratic civility as a means of safeguarding democracy in times of populism and polarization. I construe democratic civility as a normative framework for interactions among citizens in civil society, anchored in a commitment to relating to one’s fellow citizens as respected adversaries. Conceptualizing democratic civility in this way advances the scholarly literature in three ways. First, by anchoring norms of civility in disagreement, democratic civility allows us to appreciate the transformative potential of populism and polarization while retaining sufficient normative resources to restrain their challenge to democracy. Second, democratic civility highlights shortcomings in recent critical and radical contributions to debates on civility and strikes a balance between skeptics and proponents of civility. Finally, democratic civility reveals how scholarship on democratic defense and depolarization has neglected the merits of civil society and provides a normative blueprint for evaluating new avenues for safeguarding democracy.
AbizadehArash. 2021. “Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly.” Perspectives on Politics19 (3): 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719004626
AratoAndrewCohenJean L.. 2021. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. Oxford University Press.
9.
AugustVincent. 2024. “Understanding Democratic Conflicts: The Failures of Agonistic Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory23 (2): 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221120120
10.
BadanoGabrieleNutiAlasia. 2018. “Under Pressure: Political Liberalism, the Rise of Unreasonableness, and the Complexity of Containment.” The Journal of Political Philosophy26 (2): 145–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12134
11.
BadanoGabrieleNutiAlasia. 2023. “Public Reason, Partisanship and the Containment of the Populist Radical Right.” Political Studies71 (1): 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211005917
12.
BeckmanLudvig. 2025. “Uncivil Speech in the Social Media: Democracy, Political Liberalism, and the Virtue of Public Reason.” Constellations32: 356–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12807
13.
BejanTeresa M. 2017. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Harvard University Press.
BermeoNancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy27 (1): 14–19.
16.
BiegonRubrickHamdaouiSoraya. 2024. “Anti-populism and the Trump Trauma in US Foreign Policy.” International Affairs100 (5): 1857–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae174
CaroJason. 2023. Radical Civility: A Study in Utopia and democracy.Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought. Routledge.
22.
CelikatesRobin. 2016. “Rethinking Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Contestation-Beyond the Liberal Paradigm.” Constellations23 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12216
23.
CelikatesRobin. 2019. Constituent Power beyond Exceptionalism: Irregular Migration, Disobedience, and (re-)constitution. Journal of International Political Theory15(1): 67–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218808311
24.
CelikatesRobin. 2020. Radical Civility: Social Struggles and the Domestication of Dissent. In: LepoldK.ChristJ.LoickD.StahlT. (eds). Debating Critical Theory: Engagements with Axel Honneth. Rowman & Littlefield, 83–94.
ChryssogelosAngelos. “Populism in Foreign Policy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by HannahErin, Vol. 0. Oxford University Press.
27.
CohenJean L.2019. “What’s Wrong with the Normative Theory (and the Actual Practice) of Left Populism.” Constellations26 (3): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12427
28.
CohenJean L.AratoAndrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political theory.Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. MIT Press.
29.
ConnollyW. E.1993. “Beyond Good and Evil - The Ethical Sensibility of Foucault, Michel.” Political Theory21 (3): 365–89; <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1993LP94600001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591793021003002
30.
ConnollyW. E.2002. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. University of Minnesota Press.
31.
DestradiSandraPlagemannJohannesTaşHakkı. 2022. “Populism and the Politicisation of Foreign Policy.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations24 (3): 475–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221075944
32.
DryzekJohnDryzekJohn S.. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Polity.
EjdusFilip. 2018. “Critical Situations, Fundamental Questions and Ontological Insecurity in World Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development21 (4): 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0083-3
36.
FilcDani. 2015. “Latin American Inclusive and European Exclusionary Populism: Colonialism as an Explanation.” Journal of Political Ideologies20 (3): 263–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2015.1075264
37.
FinkelEli J.BailChristopher A.CikaraMina, et al.2020. “Political Sectarianism in America.” Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)370 (6516): 533–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
38.
FrankJason. 2017. “Populism and Praxis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Rovira KaltwasserCristóbalTaggartPaulEspejoPaulina OchoaOstiguyPierre, Vol. 0, 629–43. Oxford University Press.
GutmannAmyThompsonDennis. 2012. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines it. Updated edition with a New Preface by the authors. Princeton University Press.
42.
HabermasJürgen. 1989a. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. MIT Press.
43.
HabermasJürgen. 1989b. The Theory of Communicative Action Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Polity.
HabermasJürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity Press.
46.
HochschildArlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. 1st ed.The New Press.
47.
HomolarAlexandra. 2019. “The Power of Trump-Speak: Populist Crisis Narratives and Ontological Security.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs32 (3): 1–364.
48.
HonnethAxel. 1982. “Moral Consciousness and Class Domination: Some Problems in the Analysis of Hidden Morality.” Praxis International2 (1): 12–25.
49.
HopkinJonathan. 2020. Anti-System Politics: The Crisis of Market Liberalism in Rich Democracies. 1st ed.Oxford University Press.
50.
IyengarShantoLelkesYphtachLevenduskyMatthewMalhotraNeilWestwoodSean J.. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science22 (1): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
51.
JaeggiRahel. 2018. Critique of Forms of Life. Harvard University Press.
52.
JagerAnton. 2017. “The Semantic Drift: Images of Populism in Post‐War American Historiography and Their Relevance for (European) Political Science.” Constellations24 (3): 310–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12308
53.
KalyvasAndreas. 2019. “Whose Crisis? Which Democracy? Notes on the Current Political Conjuncture.” Constellations26 (3): 384–90. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
54.
KingzetteJonDruckmanJames N.KlarSamaraKrupnikovYannaLevenduskyMatthewRyanJohn Barry. 2021. “How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms.” Public Opinion Quarterly85 (2): 663–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab029
KinnvallCatarina. 2019. “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian Politics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs32 (3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588851
KrishnarajanS.2023. “Rationalizing Democracy: The Perceptual Bias and (Un)Democratic Behavior.” American Political Science Review117 (2): 474–96.
60.
LaclauErnesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. Verso.
61.
LaclauErnestoMouffeChantal. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed.Verso.
62.
LevenduskyMatthew S.2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/693987
63.
LevitskyStevenZiblattDaniel. 2018. How democracies die. Viking, an imprint of Penguin Books.
64.
LoewensteinKarl. 1937. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights.” American Political Science Review31: 417–32.
McCoyJ.SomerM.. 2019. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How it Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681 (1): 234–71; <Go to ISI>://WOS:000454143400014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782
68.
McCoyJ.SomerM.. 2021. “Overcoming Polarization.” Journal of Democracy32 (1): 6–21; <Go to ISI>://WOS:000607129700002.
69.
McCoyJenniferRahmanTahminaSomerMurat. 2018. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist62 (1): 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576. https://journals.sagepub.com/
70.
MouffeC.1993. The Return of the Political. Verso.
71.
MouffeC.1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research66 (3): 745–58; <Go to ISI>://WOS:000087720200003.
72.
MouffeC.2005. The Democratic Paradox. Verso Books.
73.
MouffeChantal. 2018. For a Left Populism. Verso.
74.
MuddeCas. 2019. The Far Right Today. Polity.
75.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2017. What Is Populism?Penguin Books.
76.
MüllerJan-Werner. 2022. “Citizens as Militant Democrats, or: Just How Intolerant Should the People Be?” Critical Review34 (1): 85–98.
Nyong’oTavisaTompkinsKyla Wazana. 2018. “Eleven Theses on Civility.” Accessed November 11th.
80.
OlsenTore VincentsTuovinenJuha. 2024. “Between Militant Democracy and Citizen Vigilantism: Using Citizens’ Assemblies to Keep Parties Democratic.” Global Constitutionalism13 (3): 535–56.
81.
ÖzdamarÖzgürYanikLerna K. 2024. “Populist Hyperpersonalization and Politicization of Foreign Policy Institutions.” International Affairs100 (5): 1835–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae181
82.
PrzeworskiAdam. 2019. Crises of Democracy. 1st ed.Cambridge University Press.
StonePeterMalkopoulouAnthoula. 2022. “Allotted Chambers as Defenders of Democracy.” Constellations29 (3): 296–309.
91.
StrömbomLisaBramsenIsabel. 2022. “Agonistic Peace: Advancing Knowledge on Institutional Dynamics and Relational Transformation.” Third World Quarterly43 (6): 1237–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2054797
TalisseRobert B.2021. Sustaining Democracy: What We Owe to the Other Side. Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford University Press.
96.
TallbergJonasUhlinAnders. 2011. “Civil Society and Global Democracy: An Assessment.” In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, edited by ArchibugiDanieleKoenig-ArchibugiMathiasMarchettiRaffaele, 210–32. Cambridge University Press.
TocquevilleAlexis De. 1999. Democracy in America (Abridged Edition). Wordsworth.
99.
VittoriDavide. 2022. “Threat or Corrective? Assessing the Impact of Populist Parties in Government on the Qualities of Democracy: A 19-Country Comparison.” Government and Opposition57 (4): 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.21
100.
WajnerDaniel F.2021. “Exploring the Foreign Policies of Populist Governments: (Latin) America First.” Journal of International Relations and Development24 (3): 651–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00206-8
101.
WajnerDaniel F.GiurlandoPhilip. 2024. “Populist Foreign Policy: Mapping the Developing Research Program on Populism in International Relations.” International Studies Review26 (1): viae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viae012
102.
WajnerDaniel F.RonigerLuis. 2022. “Populism and Transnational Projection: The Legitimation Strategies of Pink Tide Neo-Populist Leaderships in Latin America.” Comparative political theory (Leiden. Online)2 (2): 118–47. https://doi.org/10.1163/26669773-bja10037
103.
WajnerDaniel F.TaşHakkıPriego-MorenoAlbertoEssaJony. 2023. “Populist Foreign Policy in the Middle East and North Africa.” In Populist Foreign Policy: Regional Perspectives of Populism in the International Scene, edited by GiurlandoPhilipWajnerDaniel F., 171–97. Springer International Publishing.
104.
WajnerDaniel FDestradiSandraZürnMichael. 2024. “The Effects of Global Populism: Assessing the Populist Impact on International Affairs.” International Affairs100 (5): 1819–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae217
105.
WeberMax. 2013. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
ZerilliLinda M. G.2014. Against Civility: A Feminist Perspective, Vol. 107-131, 107–31. Cambridge University Press.
111.
ZúqueteJosé Pedro. 2018. The Identitarians: The Movement against Globalism and Islam in Europe. University of Notre Dame Press.
112.
ZurnChristopher F.2013. “Political Civility: Another Illusionistic Ideal.” Public Affairs Quarterly27 (4): 341–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43575586
113.
ZürnMichael. 2022. “Is Populism a Threat or a Chance for Representative Democracy?” In Contested Representation: Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms, edited by LandwehrClaudiaSaalfeldThomasSchäferArmin, SSRC Anxieties of Democracy, 232–56. Cambridge University Press.
114.
ZurnChristopher F.2023. “Populism, Polarization, and Misrecognition.” In The Theory and Practice of Recognition, edited by HirvonenOnniKoskinenHeikki J., 131–49. Routledge.
