Those who seek to rule over others recognize the humanities’ subversive quality. Democracy, Dewey notes, has always been allied with humanism. The conventional argument for the humanities is that they teach critical thinking and empathy. But this casts the humanities as merely instrumental when their role is foundational. Self-governance presupposes that the decisions we make matter. If events were the product of fate, divine plan, or the natural order of things, there would be no point to democracy. It is only with the recognition of contingency that human agency and political self-governance become imaginable. The humanistic disciplines reveal the situated, but uncertain nature of human action; they serve as a repository of past experience; and they emphasize the possibility and promise of democratic agency.
ArendtHannah. 1958. The Human Condition. 2d ed.University of Chicago Press.
3.
ArendtHannah. 1971. “Thinking and Moral Considerations.” Social Research38: 417–46.
4.
ArendtHannah. 2006. Between past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. Penguin Classics.
5.
Aristotle. 2002. The Athenian Constitution. P.J. Rhodes trans. Penguin Classics.
6.
BarberBenjamin. 1996. “Misreading Democracy.” In Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies Ancient and Modern, edited by OberJosiahHedrickCharles. Princeton University Press.
7.
Cases INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 945 (1983). Cases INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 945.
8.
DeweyJohn. 1939a. Freedom and Culture. Capricorn Books.
9.
DeweyJohn. 1939b. “Creative Democracy: the Task Before Us.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 14: 1939-1941, edited by BoydstonJo Ann. Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
DeweyJohn. 2018. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Myers Education Press. (originally published 1916).
11.
DoverKenneth J. 1971. “Socrates in The Clouds.” In The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by VlastosGregory. Anchor Books.
12.
EubenJ. Peter. 1996. “Reading Democracy: ‘Socratic’ Dialogues and the Political Education of Democratic Citizens.” In Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies Ancient and Modern, edited by OberJosiahHedrickCharles. Princeton University Press.
13.
FauconnierGillesTurnerMark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
14.
GillespieC. M.1910. “The Truth of Protagoras.” Mind19: 470–92.
15.
JohnsonMark. 1993. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. University of Chicago Press.
16.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. 1964. Signs. Richard C. McCleary trans. Northwestern University Press.
17.
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144.
18.
Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982). Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50.
19.
NussbaumMartha C.1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.
20.
NussbaumMartha C.1997. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Harvard University Press.
21.
NussbaumMartha C.2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton University Press.
22.
OehlerKlaus. 2010. “Protagoras from the Perspective of Modern Pragmatism.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society38: 207–14.
23.
OstwaldMartin. 1986. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. University of California Press.
24.
PatočkaJan. 1996. Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History. Erazim Kohác trans. Open Court.
RortyRichard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
31.
SchillerF. C. S.2016. Plato or Protagoras? Being a Critical Examination of the Protagoras Speech in the Theaetetus, with Some Remarks upon Error (Classic Reprint). Forgotten Books. (originally published 1908).
VernantJean-PierreVidal-NanquetPierre. 1990. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. Zone Books.
34.
VlastosGregory. 1971. “Introduction: the Paradox of Socrates.” In The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by VlastosGregory. Anchor Books.
35.
VlastosGregory. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cornell University Press.
36.
WinterSteven L.1989. “The Cognitive Dimension of the Agon Between Legal Power and Narrative Meaning.” Michigan Law Review87: 2225–79.
37.
WinterSteven L.1991. “Without Privilege.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review139: 1063–70.
38.
WinterSteven L.1994. “Human Values in a Postmodern World.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities6: 233–48.
39.
WinterSteven L.2001. A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind. University of Chicago Press.
40.
WinterSteven L.2010. “Law, Culture, and Humility.” In Law and Humanities: An Introduction, edited by SaratAustinAndersonMathew D.FrankCatherine O.. Cambridge University Press.
41.
WinterSteven L.2012. “Down Freedom’s Main Line.” Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy41: 202–41.
42.
WoodEllen Meiksins. 2008. Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages. Verso Books.
